Designing and evaluating a haptic system for biomolecular education

Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 171-178

  Persson, Petter Bivall ^a   Cooper, Matthew D ^a   Tibell, Lena A E ^a   Ainsworth, Shaaron ^b   Ynnerman, Anders ^a   Jonsson, Bengt Harald ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Haptic interaction; Haptics; Life science education; Protein interactions; Visualization

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULAR EDUCATION; HAPTIC INTERACTION; LIFE SCIENCE EDUCATION; PROTEIN INTERACTIONS;

BIOMOLECULES; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; LIGANDS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROTEINS;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 34547661965     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VR.2007.352478     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. O. B. Bayazit, G. Song, and N. M. Amato. Ligand binding with obprm and haptic user input: Enhancing automatic motion planning with virtual touch. Technical Report TR00-025, Department of Computer Science. Texas A&M University, Texas, USA, October 2000.
2. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. The protein databank. Nucleic Acids Research. 28(1):235-242, January 2000.
3. S. Druyan. Effect of the kinesthetic conflict on promoting scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10): 1083-1099, December 1997.
4. P. Ernest. Constructivism, the psychology of learning, and the nature of mathematics: Some critical issues. Science & Education, 2(1):87-93, March 1993.
5. J. Frederick P. Brooks, M. Ouh-Young, J. J. Batter, and P. J. Kilpatrick. Project GROPE - haptic displays for scientific visualization. In SIGGRAPH '90: Proceedings of the 17th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 177-185, New York, NY. USA, 1990. ACM Press.
6. H. P. Ginsburg. Entering the Child's Mind: The Clinical Interview In Psychological Research and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
7. D. S. Goodsell and A. J. Olson. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, (8):195-202, 1990.
8. E. Harvey and C. Gingold. Haptic representation of the atom. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation 2000. pages 232-235, London, UK, July 2000.
9. S. Kvale. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks. 1996.
10. A. Křenek, M. Černohorsk, and Z. Kabelč. Haptic visualization of molecular model. In V. Skala, editor. WSCG'99 Conference Presentation, volume 1, pages 133-139, Plzen, Czech Republic, February 1999.
11. S. K. Lai-Yuen and Y.-S. Lee. Computer-aided molecular design (camd) with force-torque feedback. In Ninth International Conference on Computer Aided Design and Computer Graphics, pages 199-204. Los Alamitos. CA, USA, December 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
12. S. J. Lederman. Tactual roughness perception: Spatial and temporal determinants. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37:498-511, 1983.
13. G. M. Morris, D. S. Goodsell, R. S. Halliday, R. Huey, W. E. Hart, R. K. Belew, and A. J. Olson. Automated docking using a lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 19(14):1639-1662, 1998.
14. G. M. Morris. D. S. Goodsell. R. Huey, and A. J. Olson. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of autodock 2.4. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, (10):293-304, 1996.
15. H. Nagata, H. Mizushima, and H. Tanaka. Concept and prototype of protein-ligand docking simulator with force feedback technology. Bioinformatics, 18(1):140-146. 2002.
16. M. Ouh-young. D. V. Beard, and F. P. Brooks Jr. Force display performs better than visual display in a simple 6-d docking task. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1462-1466. Arizona, USA, May 1989.
17. M. Ouh-young, M. Pique. J. Hughes. N. Srinivasan, and F. P. Brooks Jr. Using a manipulator for force display in molecular docking. In Proceedings of IEEE Robotics and Automation Conference 3. pages 1824-1829, Philidelphia, USA, April 1988.
18. M. Reiner. Conceptual construction of fields through tactile interface. Interactive Learning Environments, 7(1):31-55, April 1999.
19. G. Sankaranarayanan, S. Weghorst, M. Sanner, A. Gillet, and A. Olson. Role of haptics in teaching structural molecular biology. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (IEEE HAPTICS'03), pages 363-366. Los Angeles. CA, USA, March 2003.
20. K. Sathian, A. Zangaladze, J. M. Hoffman, and S. T. Grafton. Feeling with the mind's eye. Neuroreport, 8(18):3877-3881, December 1997.
21. C. M. Sauer, W. A. Hastings, and A. M. Okamura. Virtual environment for exploring atomic bonding. In Eurohaptics '04, Munich, Germany. June 2004.
22. H. R. Schiffman. Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1976.
23. I. E. Sutherland. The ultimate display. In Proceedings of IFIP Congress, pages 506-508, 1965.
24. R. Verry. Don't take touch for granted: An interview with Susan Lederman. Teaching of Psychology. 25(1):64-67, 1998.
25. A. Wachowski and L. Wachowski. The matrix. Warner Bros., 1999. 136 mins.
26. S. Weghorst. Augmented tangible molecular models. In IWSM'03-'04: The Fourth International Workshop on Spatial Media and the Sixth International Conference on Humans and Computers, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Fukushima-ken and Tokyo, Japan, August 2003.
27. H.-K. Wu, J. S. Krajcik, and E. Soloway. Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7):821-842, September 2001.
28. A. Zangaladze, C. M. Epstein, S. T. Grafton, and K. Sathian. Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature, 401:587-590, October 1999.