Self-concept and social status of accelerated and nonaccelerated students in the first 2 years of secondary school in the Netherlands

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 50-67

  Hoogeveen, Lianne ^a   Van Hell, Janet G ^a   Verhoeven, Ludo ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Academic acceleration; Secondary school; Self concept; Social status

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149139408     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986208326556     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Asher, S.R., & Coie, J. (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Boivin, M., Poulin, F., & Vitaro, F. (1994). Depressed mood and peer rejection in childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 483-498.
3. Byrne, B.M. (1996). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept. Developmental, social, and clinical consideration (pp. 287-316). New York: John Wiley.
4. Campbell, J.M., Ferguson, J.E., Herzinger, C.V., Jackson, J.N., & Marino, C. (2005). Peers' attitudes toward autism differ across sociometric groups: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 17, 281-298.
5. Cassidy, J., & Asher, S.R. (1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63, 350-365.
6. Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-181.
7. Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
8. Collangelo, N., Assouline, S.G., & Gross, M.U.M. (2004). A nation deceived. How schools hold back America's brightest students. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
9. Cornell, D.G. (1990). High-ability students who are unpopular with their peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 155-160.
10. Cornell, D.G., Callahan, C.M., Bassin, L.E., & Ramsay, S.G. (1991). Affective development in accelerated students. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 74-101). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Cornell, D.G., Callahan, C.M., & Loyd, B.H. (1991). Personality growth of female early college entrants: A controlled prospective study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 135-153.
12. Dodge, K.A., & Feldman, E. (1990). Issues in social cognition and sociometric status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 119-155). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Farmer, T.W., & Rodkin, P.C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 174-188.
14. Gagn, F., & Gagnier, N. (2004). The young gifted child. The socio-affective and academic impact of early entrance to school. Roeper Review, 26, 128-138.
15. Galloway, B., & Porath, M. (1997). Parent and teacher views of gifted children's social abilities. Roeper Review, 20, 118-121.
16. Gross, M.U.M. (1992). The use of radical acceleration in cases of extreme intellectual precocity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 91-99.
17. Gross, M.U.M. (1996, October 19-22). Giftedness, motivation and self-esteem: Effects of full-time grouping. Thematic paper session on the ECHA conference "Creativity & Culture," Vienna, Austria.
18. Gross, M.U.M. (2000). From "the saddest sound" to the D major chord: The gift of accelerated progression. Keynote address presented at the 7th ECHA, Debrecen, Hungary, August 18-22.
19. Heinbokel, A. (1997). Acceleration through grade skipping in Germany. High Ability Studies, 8, 61-77.
20. Hoge, R.D., & Renzulli, J.S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449-465.
21. Hoogeveen, L. (2000). Academic acceleration in Dutch schools. The social-emotional functioning of accelerated and nonaccelerated gifted children and adolescents. Paper presented at the 7th ECHA conference Debrecen, Hungary, August 18-22.]
22. Hoogeveen, L., & van Hell, J.G. (2006). The self-concept of accelerated students in secondary school: A long-term perspective. Paper presented at the 10th ECHA conference, Lahti, Finland, September 13-16.
23. Hoogeveen, L., van Hell, J.G., Mooij, T., & Verhoeven, L. (submitted 2008). Effects of educational programs for gifted students: Meta-analyses and review of international research.
24. Hoogeveen, L., van Hell, J.G., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). De versnellingswenselijkheidslijst [The acceleration desirability list]. Nijmegen, Netherlands: CBO.
25. Hoogeveen, L., van Hell, J.G., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Teacher attitudes toward academic acceleration and accelerated students in the Netherlands. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 30-59.
26. Hoogeveen, L., van Hell, J.G., & Verhoeven, L. (submitted 2008) Social-emotional characteristics of gifted accelerated and non-accelerated students in the Netherlands.
27. Inderbitzen, H.M., Walters, K.S., & Bukowski, A.L. (1997). The role of social anxiety in adolescent peer relations: Differences among sociometric status groups and rejected subgroups. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 338-348.
28. Jiang, X.L., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25, 1-25.
29. Kerr, B. (2000). Guiding gifted girls and young women. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 649-658). London: Elsevier.
30. Kulik, J.A. (2004). Meta-analytic studies of acceleration. In N. Collangelo, S. G. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: Schools hold back America's brightest students (pp. 13-22). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
31. Lupkowski, A.E., Whitmore, M., & Ramsay, A. (1992). The impact of early entrance to college on self-esteem: A preliminary study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 87-90.
32. Marsh, H.W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295.
33. Marsh, H.W. (1990). Self-description questionnaire, II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
34. Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K.T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376.
35. Mönks, F.J., & Pfl̈ger, R. (2005). Gifted education in 21 European countries: Inventory and perspective. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen.
36. Neihart, M., Reis, S.M., Robinson, N.M., & Moon, S.M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
37. Newcomb, A.F., Bukowski, M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
38. Norman, A.D., Ramsay, S.G., Roberts, J.L., & Martray, C.R. (2000). Effect of social setting, self-concept, and relative age on the social status of moderately and highly gifted students. Roeper Review, 23, 34-39.
39. Ochoa, S.H., & Olivarez, A. (1995). A meta-analysis of peer rating sociometric studies of pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 29, 1-19.
40. Parker, J.G., & Asher, S.R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk ? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
41. Patterson, C.J., Kupersmidt, J.B., & Griesler, P.C. (1990). Children's perceptions of self and of relationships with others as a function of sociometric status. Child Development, 61, 1335-1349.
42. Peters, W. (1998). The self-concept of able young adolescents in China and the Netherlands: A comparative study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands.
43. Proctor, T.B., Black, K.N., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1986). Early admission of selected children to elementary school: A review of the research literature. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 70-76.
44. Reyero, M., & Toura, J. (2003). El desarrollo del talento. La aceleracia como estrategia educative [The development of talent. Acceleration as an education strategy]. A Coruaa, Spain: Netbiblo S. L.
45. Richardson, T.M., & Benbow, C. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 464-470.
46. Robinson, N.M. (2004). Effects of academic acceleration on the social-emotional status of gifted students. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (pp. 59-67). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
47. Robinson, N.M., & Janos, P.M. (1986). Psychological adjustment in a college-level program of marked academic acceleration. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 51-60.
48. Robinson, N.M., & Noble, K.D. (1992). Social-emotional development and adjustment of gifted children. In M. Wang, M. Reynolds, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice (pp. 57-76). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
49. Sale, P., & Carey, D.M. (1995). The sociometric status of students with disabilities in a full-inclusion school. Exceptional Children, 62, 6-19.
50. Sayler, M.F., & Brookshire, W.K. (1993). Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students, students in gifted classes, and regular students in eighth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 150-154.
51. Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
52. Southern, W., & Jones, E.D. (1991 a). The academic acceleration of gifted children. New York: Teachers College Press.
53. Southern, W., & Jones, E.D. (1991 b). Academic acceleration: Background and issues. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 1-28). New York: Teachers college press.
54. Southern, W.T., Jones, E.D., & Fiscus, E.D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29-35.
55. Swann, W.B., Chang-Schneider, C., & McClarty, K.L. (2007). Do people's self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist, 72, 84-94.
56. Swiatek, M.A., & Benbow, C.P. (1991). Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528-538.
57. Van Boxtel, H. (1992). Sociometrische status in de adolescentie. Een correlationele studie bij 12- tot 15-jarigen in het algemeen vormend onderwijs [Sociometric status in adolescence. A correlational study of 12- to 15-year-old students in secondary education]. Doctoral dissertation submitted to Universiteitsdrukkerij, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
58. Wentzel, K.R., & Asher, S.R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754-763.