Effect of social setting, self‐concept, and relative age on the social status of moderately and highly gifted students

Roeper Review

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 34-39

  Norman, Antony D ^a   Ramsay, Shula G ^a   Roberts, Julia L ^a   Martray, Carl R ^b  

^a WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007823568     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190009554059     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ahlbrand, W. P., & Reynolds, J. A. (1972). Some social effects of cross-age grouping. Elementary School Journal, 72, 327-332.
2. Allen, J. P. (1989). Social impact of age mixing and age segregation in school: A context-sensitive investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 408-416.
3. Anastasi, A. (1992). Review of the Otis-Lennon School Ability Test, Sixth Edition [CD-ROM]. 11 Mental Measurements Yearbook.
4. Asher, S. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1986). Identifying children who are rejected by their peers. Developmental Psychology, 22, 444-449.
5. Asher, S. R. & Hymel, S. (1981). Children’s social competence in peer relations: Sociometric and behavioral assessment. In J. D. Wine & M. D. Smye (Eds.), Social Competence (125-157), New York: Guilford.
6. Austin, A. M. B., & Draper, D. C. (1981). Peer relationships of the academically gifted: A review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 129-133.
7. Austin, A. M. B., & Draper, D. C. (1984). The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle childhood. American Educational Research Journal, 2/(3), 597-604.
8. Brody, G. H., Graziano, W. G., & Musser, L. M. (1983). Familiarity and children’s behavior in same-age and mixed-age peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 19, 568-576.
9. Carlson, C.L., Lahey, B.B., & Neeper, R. (1984). Peer assessment of the social behavior of accepted, rejected, and neglected children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 189-198.
10. Catell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
11. Cohen, R., Duncan, M., & Cohen, S. (1994). Classroom peer relations of children participating in a pull-out enrichment program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 33-37.
12. Coie, J., Dodge, K., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer Rejection in Childhood (17-59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Coie, J. D. & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children’s social status: A five year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-281.
14. Coleman, L. J. & Cross, T. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41-56.
15. Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1983, May). Self-concept and the gifted child. Roeper Review, 44-47.
16. Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1985). Special class placement, level of intelligence, and the self-concept of gifted children: A social comparison perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 7-11.
17. Cornell, D. G. (1990). High ability students who are unpopular with their peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 155-160.
18. Cornell, D. G., Delcourt, M. A. B., Bland, L. C., Goldberg, M. D., & Oram, G. (1994). Low incidence of behavior problems among elementary school students in gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 4-19.
19. Cornell, D. G., Pelton, G. M., Bassin, L. E., Landrum, M., Ramsay, S. G., Cooley, M. R., Lynch, K. A., & Hamrick, E. (1990). Self-concept and peer status among gifted program youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 456-463.
20. Dauber, S. L. & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 10-15.
21. French, D. C., Waas, G. A., Stright, A. L., & Baker, J. A. (1986). Leadership asymmetries in mixed-age children’s group. Child Development, 57, 1277-1283.
22. Gallagher, J. J. (1958). Peer acceptance of highly gifted children in elementary school. Elementary School Journal, 58, 465-470.
23. Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally Gifted Children. NY: Routledge.
24. Grossberg, I. N., & Cornell, D. G. (1988). Relationship between personality adjustment and high intelligence: Terman versus Hollingworth. Exceptional Children, 5, 266-272.
25. Haier, R. J., & Denham, S. A. (1976). A summary profile of the nonintellectual correlates of mathematical precocity in boys and girls. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (225-241). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Harter, S. (1995). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. University of Denver.
27. Holliday, G. A., Koller, J. R., & Kunce, J. T. (1996). Personality attributes of high IQ/high achieving gifted adolescents: Implications of the personal styles model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 84-102.
28. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished paper. Yale University.
29. Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. NY: World Book.
30. Janos, P. M., Fung, H. C., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). Self-concept, self-esteem, and peer-relations among gifted children who feel “different”. Gifted Child Quarterly 29, 78-82.
31. Janos, P. M., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (149-196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Karnes, F. A., & Wherry, J. N. (1981). Self-concepts of gifted students as measured by the Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 49, 903-906.
33. Lehman, E. B., & Erdwins, C. J. (1981). The social and emotional adjustment of young, intellectually-gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 134-137.
34. Lemerise, E. A. (1997). Patterns of peer acceptance, social status, and social reputation in mixed age preschool and primary classrooms. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 199-218.
35. Lemerise, E. A, Harper, B. D., Caverly, S. L., & Howes, H. H. (1997). Stability of peer acceptance, social status, and social reputation in mixed-age primary classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36. Lemerise, E. A, Harper, B. D., & Howes, H. H. (1998). The transition from kindergarten to ungraded primary: Longitudinal predictors of popularity and social reputation. Early Education and Development, 9, 187-201.
37. Lombroso, C. (1893). The man of genius. London: Walter Scott.
38. Luftig, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their age peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 111-114.
39. Maas, P. (1992, March 11). Home-grown grandmasters. Washington Post, B1-B4.
40. Marsh, H. W. (1990). Self Description Questionnaire II Manual. Campbelltown, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
41. Marsh, H. W., Parker, J. & Bames, J. (1985). Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex, and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 422-444.
42. Marsh, H. W., & Peart, N. (1988). Competitive and cooperative physical fitness training programs for girls: Effects on physical fitness and multidimensional selfconcepts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 390-407.
43. Montour, K. (1976). Success versus tragedy: Wiener and Sidis. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 1, 3-4.
44. Montour, K. (1977). William James Sidis, the broken twig. American Psychologist, 32, 265-279.
45. Norman, A. D., Ramsay, S. G., Martray, C. R., & Roberts, J. L. (1999). Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment. Roeper Review, 22, 5-9.
46. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 347-352.
47. Otis, A. S., & Lennon, R. T. (1988). Otis-Lennon Multilevel Norms Booklet (6th edition). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
48. Richardson, T. M., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 464-470.
49. Rogosch, F. A., & Newcomb, A. F. (1989). Children’s per-ceptions of peer reputations and their social reputations among peers. Child Development, 60,597-610.
50. Sayler, M. F., & Brookshire, W. K. (1996). Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students in gifted classes and regular students in eighth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 150-154.
51. Schneider, B. H. et al (1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 48-56.
52. Swerdjik, M. E. (1992). Review of the Otis-Lennon School Ability Test, Sixth Edition [CD-ROM]. 11 Mental Measurements Yearbook.
53. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. NY: Macmillian.
54. Terman, L. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Terman, L. (Ed.). (1959). Genetic studies of genius (Vols. 1-4). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.