Yamanaka factors critically regulate the developmental signaling network in mouse embryonic stem cells

Cell Research

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1177-1189

  Liu, Xiaosong ^a   Huang, Jinyan ^b   Chen, Taotao ^a   Wang, Ying ^a   Xin, Shunmei ^a   Li, Jian ^c   Pei, Gang ^a,b   Kang, Jiuhong ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES   (China)

Author keywords

ChIP on chip; Embryonic stem cell; Pluripotency; Signal pathway; Yamanaka factor

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; MYCBP PROTEIN, MOUSE; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; POU5F1 PROTEIN, MOUSE; SOX2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME MAP; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROMOTER REGION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; KRUPPEL-LIKE TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; MICE; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOXB1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 57049166453     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2008.309     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006; 441:349-353.
2. Hailesellasse Sene K, Porter CJ, Palidwor G, et al. Gene function in early mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation. BMC Genomics 2007; 8:85.
3. Prakash N, Wurst W. A Wnt signal regulates stem cell fate and differentiation in vivo. Neurodegener Dis 2007; 4:333-338.
4. Silver SJ, Rebay I. Signaling circuitries in development: insights from the retinal determination gene network. Development 2005; 132:3-13.
5. Doroquez DB, Rebay I. Signal integration during development: mechanisms of EGFR and Notch pathway function and crosstalk. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2006; 41:339-385.
6. Vivekanand P, Rebay I. Intersection of signal transduction pathways and development. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40:139-157.
7. Werner T. Bioinformatics applications for pathway analysis of microarray data. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008; 19:50-54.
8. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006; 126:663-676.
9. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007; 131:861-872.
10. Nakagawa M, Koyanagi M, Tanabe K, et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:101-106.
11. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007; 318:1917-1920.
12. de Haan G, Gerrits A, Bystrykh L. Modern genome-wide genetic approaches to reveal intrinsic properties of stem cells. Curr Opin Hematol 2006; 13:249-253.
13. Vigano MA, Mantovani R. Hitting the numbers: the emerging network of p63 targets. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:233-239.
14. Schebesta A, McManus S, Salvagiotto G, et al. Transcription factor Pax5 activates the chromatin of key genes involved in B cell signaling, adhesion, migration, and immune function. Immunity 2007; 27:49-63.
15. Kim J, Chu J, Shen X, Wang J, Orkin SH. An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008; 132:1049-1061.
16. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007; 1:55-70.
17. Hough SR, Clements I, Welch PJ, Wiederholt KA. Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells after RN A interference-mediated silencing of OCT4 and Nanog. Stem Cells 2006; 24:1467-1475.
18. Ralston A, Rossant J. Cdx2 acts downstream of cell polarization to cell-autonomously promote trophectoderm fate in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol 2008; 313:614-629.
19. Zhang J, Tarn WL, Tong GQ, et al. Sall4 modulates embryonic stem cell pluripotency and early embryonic development by the transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:1114-1123.
20. Chew JL, Loh YH, Zhang W, et al. Reciprocal transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 complex in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:6031-6046.
21. Levasseur DN, Wang J, Dorschner MO, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Orkin SH. Oct4 dependence of chromatin structure within the extended Nanog locus in ES cells. Genes Dev 2008; 22:575-580.
22. Lim LS, Loh YH, Zhang W, et al. Zic3 is required for maintenance of pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:1348-1358.
23. Player A, Wang Y, Bhattacharya B, et al. Comparisons between transcriptional regulation and RNA expression in human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells Dev 2006; 15:315-323.
24. Tokuzawa Y, Kaiho E, Maruyama M, et al. Fbx15 is a novel target of Oct3/4 but is dispensable for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and mouse development. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:2699-2708.
25. Tomioka M, Nishimoto M, Miyagi S, et al. Identification of Sox-2 regulatory region which is under the control of Oct-3/4-Sox-2 complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:3202-3213.
26. Katoh Y, Katoh M. Conserved POU-binding site linked to SP1-binding site within FZD5 promoter: Transcriptional mechanisms of FZD5 in undifferentiated human ES cells, fetal liver/spleen, adult colon, pancreatic islet, and diffuse-type gastric cancer. Int J Oncol 2007; 30:751-755.
27. Nishimoto M, Fukushima A, Okuda A, Muramatsu M. The gene for the embryonic stem cell coactivator UTF1 carries a regulatory element which selectively interacts with a complex composed of Oct-3/4 and Sox-2. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:5453-5465.
28. Nishimoto M, Miyagi S, Yamagishi T, et al. Oct-3/4 maintains the proliferative embryonic stem cell state via specific binding to a variant octamer sequence in the regulatory region of the UTF1 locus. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:5084-5094.
29. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:14863-14868.
30. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:15545-15550.
31. Boyer LA, Lee TI, Cole MF, et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2005; 122:947-956.
32. Hartl D, Irmler M, Romer I, et al. Transcriptome and proteome analysis of early embryonic mouse brain development. Proteomics 2008; 8:1257-1265.
33. Wu J, Mao X, Cai T, Luo J, Wei L. KOBAS server: a webbased platform for automated annotation and pathway identification. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:W720-W724.
34. Hegland DD, Sullivan DM, Rovira II, et al. Regulation of endothelial cell adherens junctions by a Ras-dependent signal transduction pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Cornmun 1999; 260:371-376.
35. Nicola NA. Cytokine pleiotropy and redundancy: a view from the receptor. Stem Cells 1994; 12: discussion 12-14.
36. Ozaki K, Leonard WJ. Cytokine and cytokine receptor pleiotropy and redundancy. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:29355-29358.
37. Myers DC, Sepich DS, Solnica-Krezel L. Convergence and extension in vertebrate gastrulae: cell movements according to or in search of identity? Trends Genet 2002; 18:447-455.
38. Soto X, Mayor R, Torrejon M, et al. Galphaq negatively regulates the Wnt-beta-catenin pathway and dorsal embryonic Xenopus laevis development. J Cell Physiol 2008; 214:483-490.
39. Marmor MD, Skaria KB, Yarden Y. Signal transduction and oncogenesis by ErbB/HER receptors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 58:903-913.
40. Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6:56-68.
41. Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW. MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:W369-373.
42. Rodda DJ, Chew JL, Lim LH, et al. Transcriptional regulation of nanog by OCT4 and SOX2. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:24731-24737.
43. Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL, et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2006; 38:431-440.
44. Sato N, Sanjuan IM, Heke M, et al. Molecular signature of human embryonic stem cells and its comparison with the mouse. Dev Biol 2003; 260:404-413.
45. James D, Levine AJ, Besser D, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. TGF-beta/activin/nodal signaling is necessary for the maintenance of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Development 2005; 132:1273-1282.
46. Darnell Jr JE. Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2:740-749.
47. Darnell JE. Validating Stat3 in cancer therapy. Nat Med 2005; 11:595-596.
48. Armstrong EJ, Bischoff J. Heart valve development: endothelial cell signaling and differentiation. Circ Res 2004; 95:459-470.
49. Wang J, Shou J, Chen X. Dickkopf-1, an inhibitor of the Wnt signaling pathway, is induced by p53. Oncogene 2000; 19:1843-1848.
50. Verheyen EM. Opposing effects of Wnt and MAPK on BMP/Smad signal duration. Dev Cell 2007; 13:755-756.
51. Sun Y, Lowther W, Kato K, et al. Notch4 intracellular domain binding to Smad3 and inhibition of the TGF-beta signaling. Oncogene 2005; 24:5365-5374.
52. Duncan AW, Rattis FM, DiMascio LN, et al. Integration of Notch and Wnt signaling in hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nat Immunol 2005; 6:314-322.
53. Hayward P, Brennan K, Sanders P, et al. Notch modulates Wnt signalling by associating with Armadillo/beta-catenin and regulating its transcriptional activity. Development 2005; 132:1819-1830.
54. Espinosa L, Ingles-Esteve J, Aguilera C, Bigas A. Phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta downregulates Notch activity, a link for Notch and Wnt pathways. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:32227-32235.
55. Baker JC, Beddington RS, Harland RM. Wnt signaling in Xenopus embryos inhibits bmp4 expression and activates neural development. Genes Dev 1999; 13:3149-3159.
56. Zorn AM, Butler K, Gurdon JB. Anterior endomesoderm specification in Xenopus by Wnt/beta-catenin and TGF-beta signalling pathways. Dev Biol 1999; 209:282-297.
57. Warner DR, Greene RM, Pisano MM. Cross-talk between the TGF-beta and Wnt signaling pathways in murine embryonic maxillary mesenchymal cells. FEBS Lett 2005; 579:3539-3546.
58. Dreesen O, Brivanlou AH. Signaling pathways in cancer and embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 2007; 3:7-17.
59. Katoh Y, Katoh M. Hedgehog signaling pathway and gastrointestinal stem cell signaling network (review). Int J Mol Med 2006; 18:1019-1023.
60. Pinkas-Kramarski R, Alroy I, Yarden Y. ErbB receptors and EGF-like ligands: cell lineage determination and oncogenesis through combinatorial signaling. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1997; 2:97-107.
61. Montell DJ. Command and control: regulatory pathways controlling invasive behavior of the border cells. Mech Dev 2001; 105:19-25.
62. Kandler K, Katz LC. Relationship between dye coupling and spontaneous activity in developing ferret visual cortex. Dev Neurosci 1998; 20:59-64.
63. Nguyen H, Rendl M, Fuchs E. Tcf3 governs stem cell features and represses cell fate determination in skin. Cell 2006; 127:171-183.
64. Zeng S, Xu Z, Lipkowitz S, Longley JB. Regulation of stem cell factor receptor signaling by Cbl family proteins (Cbl-b/c-Cbl). Blood 2005; 105:226-232.
65. Horsley V, Aliprantis AO, Polak L, Glimcher LH, Fuchs E. NFATcl balances quiescence and proliferation of skin stem cells. Cell 2008; 132:299-310.
66. Chen X, Xu H, Yuan P, et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008; 133:1106-1117.
67. Liu SV. iPS cells: a more critical review. Stem Cells Dev 2008; 17:391-397.
68. Okumura-Nakanishi S, Saito M, Niwa H, Ishikawa F. Oct-3/4 and Sox2 regulate Oct-3/4 gene in embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:5307-5317.
69. Wang H, Yang L, Jamaluddin MS, Boyd DD. The Kruppellike KLF4 transcription factor, a novel regulator of urokinase receptor expression, drives synthesis of this binding site in colonic crypt luminal surface epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:22674-22683.
70. Sze KL, Lee WM, Lui WY. Expression of CLMP, a novel tight junction protein, is mediated via the interaction of GATA with the Kruppel family proteins, KLF4 and Sp1, in mouse TM4 Sertoli cells. J Cell Physiol 2008; 214:334-344.
71. Boyd KE, Wells J, Gutman J, Bartley SM, Famham PJ. c-Myc target gene specificity is determined by a post-DNA binding mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:13887-13892.
72. Zeller KI, Haggerty TJ, Barrett JF, et al. Characterization of nucleophosmin (B23) as a Myc target by scanning chromatin immunoprecipitation. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:48285-48291.
73. Jin VX, O'Geen H, Iyengar S, Green R, Farnham PJ. Identification of an OCT4 and SRY regulatory module using integrated computational and experimental genomics approaches. Genome Res 2007; 17:807-817.
74. O'Geen H, Nicolet CM, Blahnik K, Green R, Farnham PJ. Comparison of sample preparation methods for ChIP-chip assays. Biotechniques 2006; 41:577-580.
75. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003; 13:2498-2504.