Direct use of PGV for estimating peak nonlinear oscillator displacements

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1411-1433

  Akkar, Sinan ^a   Küçükdoǧan, Bilge ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bilinear hysteretic model; Ground motion predictive models; Inelastic displacement; Peak ground velocity; Regression; Seismic design performance assessment

Indexed keywords

BILINEAR HYSTERETIC MODEL; GROUND-MOTION PREDICTIVE MODELS; INELASTIC DISPLACEMENT; PEAK GROUND VELOCITY; REGRESSION; SEISMIC DESIGN/PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

DISPLACEMENT; DUCTILITY; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; FAULT; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OSCILLATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; STIFFNESS;

EID: 54749133850     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.819     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Veletsos AS, Newmark NM. Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions. Proceedings of 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. II, Tokyo, 1960; 895-912.
2. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities. Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1973; 209-236.
3. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake Spectra and Design. EERI Monograph Series. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute: Oakland, CA, 1982.
4. Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126(10):1150-1159. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1150).
5. MacRae GA, Tagawa H. Methods to estimate displacements of PG&E structures. Final Report PG&E/PEER Task No. 505, Seattle, WA, 2002.
6. Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C. Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(9):1309-1319. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309).
7. Ruiz-Garcia J, Miranda E. Inelastic ratios for design of structures on soft soils sites. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(12):2051-2061. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(2051).
8. Ruiz-García J, Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(g):1237-1259. DOI: 10.1002 /eqe.271.
9. Miranda E. Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 127(9):1005-1012. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1005).
10. Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23(5):507-521. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290230504.
11. Cuesta I, Aschheim MA, Fajfar P. Simplified R-factor relationships for strong ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2003; 19(1):25-45. DOI: 10.1193/1.1540997.
12. Riddell R, Garcia JE, Garces E. Inelastic deformation response of SDOF systems subjected to earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):515-538. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.142.
13. Elghadamsi F, Mohraz B. Inelastic earthquake spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1987; 15(1):91-104. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290150107.
14. Sewel RT. Damage effectiveness of earthquake ground motion: characterizations based on the performance of structures and equipment. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1989; 619.
15. Nassar AA, Krawinlder H. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. Report No. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1991.
16. Miranda E. Site dependent strength reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 119(12):3503-3519. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3503).
17. Song JK, Pincheira J. Spectral displacement demands of stiffness- and strength-degrading systems. Earthquake Spectra 2000; 16(4):817-851. DOI: 10.1193/1.1586141.
18. Arroyo D, Terán A. Strength reduction factors for ductile structures with passive energy dissipating devices. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 7(2):297-325. D01: 10.1142 /SI363246903001036.
19. Peköz HA, Pincheira JA. Seismic response of stiffness and strength degrading systems. Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004; Paper No. 936.
20. MacRae GA, Roeder CW. Near-field ground motion effects on short structures. Final Report to PG&E/PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Richmond, CA, 1999.
21. Baéz JI, Miranda E. Amplification factors to estimate inelastic displacement demands for the design of structures in the near field. Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, CDRom Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
22. MacRae GA, Morrow DV, Roeder CW. Near-fault ground motion effects on simple structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 127(9):996-1004. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(996).
23. Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C. Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30(12):1769-1789. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.92.
24. Miranda E, Bertero VV. Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design. Earthquake Spectra 1994; 10(2):357-397. DOI: 10.1193/1.1585778.
25. Mahin SA, Bertero VV. An evaluation of inelastic seismic design spectra. Journal of Structural Division (ASCE) 1981; 107:1777-1795.
26. Ordaz M, Pérez-Rocha LE. Estimation of strength-reduction factors for elasto-plastic systems: a new approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(9):889-901. DOI: 10.1002/ (SICI)1096-9845 (199809)27.
27. Chakraborati A, Gupta VK. Scaling of strength reduction factors for degrading elasto-plastic oscillators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(2):189-206. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.416.
28. Karmakar D, Gupta VK. Estimation of strength reduction factors via normalized pseudo-acceleration response spectrum. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(6):751-763. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.651.
29. FEMA. FEMA NEBRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Guidelines (FEMA 273) and Commentary (FEMA-274), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
30. ASCE. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA 356, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, DC, 2000.
31. FEMA. The 2003 NEHRP recommended provisions for new buildings and other structures. Part 1: Provisions (FEMA 450), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2003.
32. ATC. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Report No. FEMA 440, Applied Technology Council, Washington, DC, 2005.
33. Tothong P, Cornell AC. An empirical ground-motion attenuation relation for inelastic spectral displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2006; 96(6):2146-2164. DOI: 10.1785/ 0120060018.
34. Riddell R. On ground motion intensity indices. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23(1):147-173.
35. Akkar S, Özen _sO. Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(13):1551-1571. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.492.
36. Kurama YC, Farrow KT. Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(15):2425-2450. DOI: 10.1002/ eqe.335.
37. Küçükdoǧan B. Investigation of the effect of ground-motion intensity measures on seismic demand parameters using probabilistic methods. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2007.
38. Valles RE, Reinhorn AM, Kunnath SK, Li C, Madan A. IDARC-2D version 4.0: a program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings. Report No. NCEER 96-0010, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY, 1996.
39. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computation (FORTRAN Version). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989; 702.
40. Akkar S, Sucuopu H, Yakut A. Displacement-based fragility functions for low- and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(4):901-927. DOI: 10.1193/1.2084232.
41. Sucuoglu H, Yazgan U, Yakut A. A screening procedure for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23(2):441-458. DOI: 10.1193/1.2720931.
42. Joyner WB, Boore DM. Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1981; 71(6):2011-2038.
43. Akkar S, Bommer JJ. Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2007; 97(2):511-530. DOI: 10.1785/0120060141.
44. Anderson JC, Bertero VV. Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1987; 113:1709-1723.
45. Alavi B, Krawinkler H. Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33(6):687-706. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.369.
46. Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A. Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2004; 24(11):815-828. DOI: 10.1016/ j.soildyn.2004.05.001.
47. Akkar S, Yazgan U, Gülkan P. Deformation limits for simple non-degrading systems subjected to near-fault ground motions. Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004; Paper No. 2276.
48. Akkar S, Bommer JJ. Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(9):1145-1165. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.577.
49. Akkar S, Bommer JJ. Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(10):1275-1301. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.679.
50. Boore DM, Atkinson G. Ground-motion predictions equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped SA at spectral periods between 0.01s and 10.0. Earthquake Spectra 2007; submitted for publication.
51. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 1981; 709.
52. Myers RH. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. PWS Publishers: Boston, MA, 1986; 359.
53. Douglas J, Smit PM. How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2001; 91(6):1917-1923. DOI: 10.1795/0120000279.
54. Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ, Alarcón JE, Akkar S. Ground-motion predictions over extended magnitude range. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2007; 97(6):2152-2170. DOI: 10.1785/0120070081.
55. Beyer K, Bommer JJ. Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2006; 96(4A):1512-1522. DOI: 10.1785/0120050210.
56. Beyer K, Bommer JJ. Errata: relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2007; 97(5):1769. DOI: 10.1785/0120070128.
57. Faccioli E, Paolucci R, Rey J. Displacement spectra for long periods. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(2):347-376. DOI: 10.1193 /1.1707022.
58. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS, Displacement spectra for seismic design. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1999; 3(1):1-32. DOI: 10.1142/S1363246999000028.
59. Wu YM, Teng TI, Shin TC, Hsiao NC. Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and intensity in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003; 93(1):386-396. DOI: 10.1785/0120020097.