Estimation of strength reduction factors via normalized pseudo-acceleration response spectrum

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 751-763

  Karmakar, Debasis ^a   Gupta, Vinay K ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

Author keywords

Elasto plastic oscillator; Pseudo acceleration response spectrum; Strength reduction factor

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; DUCTILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; ELASTOPLASTICITY; OSCILLATORS (MECHANICAL); SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

ELASTO-PLASTIC OSCILLATOR; PSEUDO-SPECTRAL ACCELERATION (PSA); STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS (SRFS);

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

DUCTILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; ELASTOPLASTICITY; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPECTRUM; STRENGTH;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247571974     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.651     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ATC-19. Structural Response Modification Factors. Applied Technology Council: Redwood City, CA, 1995.
2. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Procedures and criteria for earthquake resistant design. Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation. Building Science Series 46, vol. 1. National Bureau of Standards, United States Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 1973; 209-236.
3. Lai S-P, Biggs JM. Inelastic response spectra for aseismic building design. Journal of Structural Division (ASCE) 1980; 106(ST6):1295-1310.
4. Elghadamsi FE, Mohraz B. Inelastic earthquake spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1987; 15:91-104.
5. Riddell R, Hidalgo P, Cruz E. Response modification factors for earthquake resistant design of short period buildings. Earthquake Spectra 1989; 5(3):571-589.
6. Krawinkler H, Nassar A. Strength and ductility demands for SDOF and MDOF systems subjected to Whittier narrows earthquake ground motions. CSMIP-1990, California Department of Conservation, Sacramento, 1990.
7. Miranda E. Site-dependent strength reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 119(12):3503-3519.
8. Fajfar P, Vidic T, Fischinger M. Influence of damping model on the seismic response of nonlinear SDOF systems. Structural Dynamics - EURODYN'93. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; 77-84.
9. Lee LH, Han SW, Oh YH. Determination of ductility factor considering different hysteretic models. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:957-977.
10. Tiwari AK, Gupta VK. Scaling of ductility and damage-based strength reduction factors for horizontal motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:969-987.
11. Chakraborti A, Gupta VK. Scaling of strength reduction factors for degrading elasto-plastic oscillators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:189-206.
12. Ordaz M, Pérez-Rocha LE. Estimation of strength-reduction factors for elastoplastic systems: a new approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:889-901.
13. Trifunac MD, Lee VW. Preliminary empirical models for scaling pseudo relative velocity spectra of strong earthquake accelerations in terms of magnitude, distance, site intensity and recording site conditions. Report No. CE 85-04, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1985.
14. Lee VW, Trifunac MD. Strong earthquake ground motion data in EQUINFOS: Part 1. Report No. CE 87-01, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1987.
15. Karmakar D. Design spectrum-based scaling of strength reduction factors. M.Tech. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India, 2004.
16. Mukherjee S, Gupta VK. Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time-histories. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002; 22:799-804.