Displacement-based fragility functions for low- And mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 901-927

  Akkar, Sinan ^a   Sucuoǧlu, Haluk ^a   Yakut, Ahmet ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; CONSTRUCTION; DEFORMATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

FRAGILITY FUNCTIONS; PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION (PGA); PEAK GROUND VELOCITY (PGV); TURKEY;

CONCRETE BUILDINGS;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; PEAK ACCELERATION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

TURKEY;

EID: 29544445319     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2084232     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
2. Aydoǧan, V., 2003. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Turkey, master's thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
3. Boǧaziçi University, 2002. Earthquake Risk Assessment for Istanbul Metropolitan Area, Final Report, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Center, Istanbul.
4. Computers and Structures, Inc., 2000. SAP 2000 Nonlinear, Version 7.21, Structural Analysis Program, Berkeley, CA.
5. Iwan, W. D., Huang, C.-T., and Guyader, A. C., 2000. Important features of the response of inelastic structures to near-field ground motion, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Paper No. 1740.
6. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, 2002. The Study on a Disaster Prevention/Mitigation Basic Plan in Istanbul Including Seismic Microzonation in the Republic of Turkey, Final Report, Istanbul.
7. Kircher, C. A., Nassar, A. A., Kustu, O., and Holmes, W. T., 1997. Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation, Earthquake Spectra 12 (4), 663-682.
8. Krawinkler, H., Medina, R., and Alavi, B., 2003. Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions, Eng. Struct. 25, 637-653.
9. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), 1997. Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology HAZUS97 User's Manual, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
10. Parsons, T., Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Barka, A., and Dieterich, J. H., 2000. Heightened odds of large earthquakes near Istanbul: An interaction-based probability calculation, Science 288, 661-665.
11. Peterson, M. D., Toppozada, T. R., Cao, T., Cramer, C. H., Reichle, M., and Bryant, W. A., 2000. Active fault near-source zones within and bordering the state of California for the 1997 Uniform Building Code, Earthquake Spectra 16 (1), 69-84.
12. Ruiz-García, J., and Miranda, E., 2003. Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 1237-1258.
13. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T., 2000. Statistical analysis of fragility curves, J. Struct. Eng. 126, 1224-1231.
14. Shinozuka, M., Grigoriu, M., Ingraffea, A. R., Billington, S. L., Feenstra, P., Soong, T. T., Reinhorn, A. M., and Maragakis, E., 1999. Research Progress and Accomplishment 1999-2000: Selected Papers, MCEER, SUNY at Buffalo, NY.
15. Sucuoǧlu, H., Gür, T., and Günay, M. S., 2004. Performance-based seismic rehabilitation of damaged buildings, J. Struct. Eng. 130, 1475-1486.
16. Sucuoǧlu, H., and Yilmaz, T., 2001. Düzce, Turkey: A city hit by two major earthquakes in 1999 within three months, Seismol. Res. Lett. 72, 679-689.
17. Sullivan, T. J., Calvi, G. M., and Priestley, M. J. N., 2004. Initial stiffness versus secant stiffness in displacement based design, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B. C., Canada, Paper No. 2888.
18. Turkish Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, 1975. Specifications for Buildings Constructed in Disaster Areas, Ankara.
19. Turkish Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, 1998. Specifications for Buildings Constructed in Disaster Areas, Ankara.
20. Wald, D. J., Quitariano, V., and Heaton, T. H., 1999. Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli intensity in California, Earthquake Spectra 15 (3), 557-564.
21. Yakut, A., Yilmaz, N., and Bayili, S., 2003. Analytical assessment of the seismic capacity of RC frame buildings, International Conference in Earthquake Engineering to Mark 40 Years from Catastrophic 1963 Skopje Earthquake, Skopje-Ohrid, Paper No. 50.