Scaling of strength reduction factors for degrading elasto-plastic oscillators

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 189-206

  Chakraborti, Arindam ^a   Gupta, Vinay K ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

Author keywords

Elasto plastic oscillator; Linear regression analysis; Scaling model; Strength and stiffness degradation; Strength reduction factor

Indexed keywords

DUCTILITY; ELASTOPLASTICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

DUCTILITY DEMAND RATIO; INELASTIC SPECTRA; STIFFNESS DEGRADATION; STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS (SRF);

OSCILLATORS (MECHANICAL);

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SCALE EFFECT; SEISMIC HAZARD; SITE EFFECT;

EID: 12444298993     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.416     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ATC-19. Structural Response Modification Factors. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1995.
2. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Procedures and criteria for earthquake resistant design. In Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, Building Science Series 46, National Bureau of Standards, United States Department of Commerce, Washington DC, 1973; vol. 1:209-236.
3. Lai S-P, Biggs JM. Inelastic response spectra for aseismic building design. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1980; 106 ST6):1295-1310.
4. Elghadamsi FE, Mohraz B. Inelastic earthquake spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1987; 15:91-104.
5. Peng MH, Elghadamsi F, Mohraz B. A stochastic procedure for nonlinear response spectra. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan. 1988; V:1069-1074.
6. Riddell R, Hidalgo P, Cruz E. Response modification factors for earthquake resistant design of short period buildings. Earthquake Spectra 1989; 5(3):571-590.
7. Krawinkler H, Nassar A. Strength and Ductility Demands for SDOF and MDOF Systems Subjected to Whittier Narrows Earthquake Ground Motions, CSMIP-1990, California Department of Conservation, Sacramento, 1990.
8. Krawinkler H, Rahnama M. Effects of soil on design spectra. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain. 1992; 10:5841-5846.
9. Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:837-848.
10. Fajfar P, Vidic T, Fischinger M. Influence of damping model on the seismic response of nonlinear SDOF systems. Structural Dynamics-EURODYN'93. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands 1993; 77-84.
11. Miranda E. Site-dependent strength reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 119(12):3503-3519.
12. Riddell R. Inelastic design spectra accounting for soil conditions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24 1491-1510.
13. Ordaz M, Pérez-Rocha LE. Estimation of strength-reduction factors for elastoplastic systems: a new approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:889-901.
14. Tiwari AK, Gupta VK. Scaling of ductility and damage-based strength reduction factors for horizontal motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:969-987.
15. Lee LH, Han SW, Oh YH. Determination of ductility factor considering different hysteretic models. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:957-977.
16. Gupta VK, Nielsen SRK, Kirkegaard PH. A preliminary prediction of seismic damage-based degradation in RC structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:981-993.
17. Lee VW, Trifunac MD. Strong Earthquake Ground Motion Data in EQUINFOS: Part 1, Report No. CE 87-01, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1987.
18. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1975; 65:581-626.
19. Trifunac MD, Lee VW. Preliminary Empirical Model for Scaling Pseudo Relative Velocity Spectra of Strong Earthquake Acceleration in Terms of Earthquake Magnitude, Source to Station Distance, Site Intensity and Recording Site Conditions, Report No. CE 85-04, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1985.
20. Trifunac MD, Anderson JG. Preliminary Empirical Models for Scaling Absolute Acceleration Spectra, Report No. CE 77-03, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1977.
21. Trifunac MD, Anderson JG. Preliminary Empirical Models for Scaling Pseudo Relative Velocity Spectra, Report No. CE 78-04, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1978.
22. Trifunac MD, Lee VW. Dependence of the Fourier Amplitude Spectra of Strong Motion Acceleration on the Depth of Sedimentary Deposits, Report No. CE 78-14, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1978.
23. Trifunac MD, Lee VW. Preliminary Empirical Model for Scaling Fourier Amplitude Spectra of Strong Ground Acceleration in Terms of Earthquake Magnitude, Source to Station Distance, Site Intensity and Recording Site Conditions, Report No. CE 85-03, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1985.
24. Tiwari AK. On scaling of strength reduction factors for horizontal earthquake ground motions. MTech Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India, 1998.
25. Chakraborti A. Scaling of strength reduction factors for degrading elasto-plastic oscillators. MTech Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India, 2001.
26. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. Correlations of peak acceleration, velocity and displacement with earthquake magnitude, distance and site conditions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1976; 4:455-471.
27. Miranda E. Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 127:1005-1012.
28. Ruiz-Garcia J, Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:1237-1258. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.271