Site-dependent strength-reduction factors

Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)

Volumn 119, Issue 12, 1993, Pages 3503-3519

  Miranda, Eduardo ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; ENERGY DISSIPATION; HYSTERESIS; INELASTIC DEFORMATION; SITE CONDITIONS; SOIL MECHANICS; STRENGTH REDUCTION;

DEFORMATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; ENERGY DISSIPATION; HYSTERESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; STATISTICAL TESTS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; INELASTIC DEFORMATION; LINEAR ELASTIC DESIGN SPECTRA; SOFT SOIL SITES; STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 0027789961     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3503)     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bertero, V. V., Anderson, J. C., Krawinkler, H., and Miranda, E. (1991). "Design guidelines for ductility and drift limits." Report no. EERC/UCB-91/15, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
2. Elghadamsi, F. E., and Mohraz, B. (1987). "Inelastic earthquake spectra." Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 15(2), 91-104.
3. Krawinkler, H., and Nassar, A. (1990). "Strength and ductility demands for SDOF and MDOF systems subjected to Whittier Narrows earthquake ground motions." CSMIP-1990, California Dept. of Conservation, Sacramento, Calif.
4. Krawinkler, H., and Rahnama, M. (1992). "Effects of soft soils on design spectra." Proc., 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Int. Assoc. for Earthquake Engrg., Madrid, Spain, 10, 5841-5846.
5. Miranda, E., and Bertero, V. V. (1991). "Evaluation of structural response factors using ground motions recorded during the Loma Prieta earthquake." CSMIP-1991, California Dept. of Conservation, Sacramento, Calif.
6. Miranda, E. (1991). "Seismic evaluation and upgrading of existing buildings," PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
7. Miranda, E. (1993). "Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra." J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 119(5), 1319-1338.
8. Nassar, A., and Krawinkler, H. (1991). "Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems." Report no. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engrg. Ctr., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
9. Newmark, N. M., and Hall, W. J. (1973). "Procedures and criteria for earthquake resistant design." Build. Res. Series No. 46, Nat. Bureau of Standards, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 209-236.
10. Osteraas, J. D., and Krawinkler, H. (1990). "Strength and ducility considerations in seismic design." Report no. 90, The John A Blume Earthquake Engrg. Ctr., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
11. Peng, M.-H., Elghadamsi, F. E., and Mohraz, B. (1988). "A stochastic procedure for nonlinear response spectra." Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Int. Assoc. for Earthquake Engrg., Tsukuba, Japan, V, 1069-1074.
12. Riddell, R., and Newmark, N. M. (1979). "Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes." Structural Research Series No. 468, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, III.
13. Riddell, R., Hidalgo, P., and Cruz, E. (1989). "'Response modification factors for earthquake resistant design of short period structures." Earthquake Spectra, 5(3), 571-590.
14. Silva, W. J., and Green, R. K. (1989). "Magnitude and distance scaling of response spectral shapes for rock sites with applications to North American tectonic environment." Earthquake Spectra, 5(3), 591-603.
15. Uniform building code. (1988). Int. Conf. of Build. Officials, Whittier, Calif.