Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1145-1165

  Akkar, Sinan ^a   Bommer, Julian J ^b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data processing; Elastic oscillator displacement demands; European ground motion database; Long period filter cut off

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DEFORMATION; ELASTICITY; OSCILLATORS (MECHANICAL); STATISTICS;

ELASTIC OSCILLATOR DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS; GROUND MOTION; GROUND-MOTION DATABASE; LONG-PERIOD FILTER CUT-OFF; OSCILLATOR DEFORMATION;

SEISMOLOGY;

DAMPING; DATA PROCESSING; DISPLACEMENT; GEOSTATISTICS; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOLOGY; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

ASIA; EURASIA; EUROPE; MIDDLE EAST;

EID: 33646739214     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.577     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bommer JJ, Pinho R. Adapting earthquake actions in Eurocode 8 for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(1):39-55. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.530.
2. Iwan WD. Estimating inelastic response spectra from elastic spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1980; 8:375-388.
3. Krawinkler H, Nassar AA. Seismic based design on ductility demand and cumulative damage demands and capacities. In Non-linear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Fajfar P, Krawinkler H (eds). Elsevier Science: New York, 1992.
4. Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C. Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130:1309-1319. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309).
5. Trifunac MD. Zero baseline correction of strong-motion accelerograms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1971; 61:1201-1211.
6. Lee VW, Trifunac MD. Current developments in data processing of strong motion accelerograms. Report No. 84-01, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1984.
7. Boore DM. On pads and filters: Processing strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2005; 95:745-750. DOI: 10.1785/ 0120040160.
8. Converse AM, Brady AG. BAP-basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software. Open File Report No. 92-296A, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, 1992.
9. Sunder SS, Connor JJ. A new procedure for processing strong-motion earthquake signals. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1982; 72:643-661.
10. Boore DM, Bommer JJ. Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005; 25:93-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.007.
11. Trifunac MD, Udwadia FE, Brady AG. Analysis of errors in digital strong-motion accelerograms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1973; 63:157-187.
12. Lee VW, Trifunac MD. Automatic digitization and processing of accelerograms using PC. Report No. 90-03, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1990.
13. Skarlatoudis AA, Papazachos CB, Margaris BN. Determination of noise spectra from strong motion data recorded in Greece. Journal of Seismology 2003; 7:533-540.
14. Trifunac MD, Lee VW, Todorovska MI. Common problems in automatic digitization of strong motion accelerograms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1999; 18:519-530.
15. Boore DM, Stephens CD, Joyner WB. Comments on baseline correction of digital strong motion data: examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2002; 92:1543-1560.
16. Trifunac MD, Todorovska MI. A note on the usable dynamic range of accelerographs recording translation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2001; 21:275-286.
17. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 1997; 68:94-127.
18. Spudich P, Joyner WB, Lindh AG, Boore DM, Margaris BM, Fletcher JB. SEA99: a revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1999; 89:1156-1170.
19. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM. Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2005; 3:1-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0.
20. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS. Displacement spectra for seismic design. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1999; 3:1-32.
21. Boore DM, Akkar S. Effect of causal and acausal filters on elastic and inelastic response spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:1729-1748. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.299.
22. Bazzurro P, Sjoberg B, Luco N, Silva W, Darragh R. Effects of storing motion processing procedures on time histories, elastic and inelastic spectra. Invited Workshop on Strong Motion Record Processing, Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS), Richmond, CA, 2004.
23. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ. Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:371-400.
24. Ambraseys NN, Smit P, Rinaldis D, Berardi D, Cotton F, Berge C. Dissemination of European strong motion data. CD-ROM Collection, European Commission, Brussels. Directorate-General XII, Environmental and Climate Programme, ENV4-CT97-0397, 2000.
25. Joyner WB, Boore DM. Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, Proceedings of American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering Division Specialty Conference, Park City, Utah, 1988; 43-102.
26. Atkinson GM, Silva W. Stochastic modeling of California ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2000; 90:255-274.
27. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Berge-Thierry C, Suhadolc P, Costa G, Sigbjörnsson R, Smit P. Dissemination of European Strong-motion Data, vol. 2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council: Swindon, U.K., 2004.
28. Zaré M, Bard P-Y. Strong motion dataset of Turkey: data processing and site classification. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002; 22:703-718.
29. Brune JN. Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research 1970; 75:4997-5002.
30. Brune JN. Correction. Journal of Geophysical Research 1971; 76:5002.
31. Boore DM. Ground motion in Anchorage, Alaska, from the 2002 Denali fault earthquake: site response and displacement pulses. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2004; 94:S72-S84.
32. Hartzell S. Earthquake aftershocks as Green's functions. Geophysical Research Letters 1978; 5:1-14.
33. Douglas J. What is a poor quality strong-motion record? Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 1:141-156. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024861528201.
34. Hamming RW. Digital Filters. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
35. Ang AH-S, Tang WH. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, vol. 1. Wiley: New York, 1975.
36. Boore DM. Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2001; 91:1199-1211.
37. Faccioli E, Paolucci R, Rey J. Displacement spectra for long periods. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20:347-376.