Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: Single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 130, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1309-1319

  Chopra, Anil K ^a   Chintanapakdee, Chatpan ^b  

^a Berkeley   (United States)

^b CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Deformation; Ground motion; Inelastic action; Structural analysis

Indexed keywords

BILINEAR SYSTEMS; GROUND MOTIONS; INELASTIC ACTIONS; SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM (SDOF) SYSTEMS;

DEFORMATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; ELASTICITY; SHEAR STRESS; STIFFNESS MATRIX; STRAIN RATE; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

EID: 1842780494     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309)     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1996). "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings." Rep. No. ATC-40, Redwood City, Calif.
2. Báez, J. I., and Miranda, E. (2000). "Amplification factors to estimate inelastic displacement demands for the design of structures in the near field." Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, (CD-Rom) Auckland, New Zealand.
3. Chop'ra, A. K. (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
4. Chopra, A. K., and Chintanapakdee, C. (2001). "Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(12), 1769-1789.
5. Chopra, A. K., and Chiatanapakdee, C. (2003). "Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures." Rep. No. EERC-200309, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif., (http://eerc.berkeley.edu/reports/2003/eerc.2003.09.pdf)
6. Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K. (1999). "Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum." Earthquake Spectra, 15(4), 637-656.
7. Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K. (2002). "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561-582.
8. Chopra, A. K., Goel, R. K., and Chintanapakdee, C. (2003). "Statistics of single-degree-of-freedom estimate of displacement for pushover analysis of buildings." J. Struct. Eng., 129(4), 459-469.
9. Clough, R. W. (1966). "Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements." Rep. No. SEMM 66-16, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
10. Fajfar, P. (2000). "A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design." Earthquake Spectra, 16(3), 573-592.
11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1997). "NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings." Rep. No. FEMA-273 (Guidelines) and Rep. No. FEMA-274 (Commentary), Washington, D.C.
12. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2000). "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings." Rep. No. FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
13. Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H. (1998). "Effect of stiffness degradation on deformation demands for SDOF and MDOF structures." Proc., 6th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Calif.
14. Gupta, B., and Kunnath, S. (1998). "Effect of hysteretic model parameters on inelastic seismic demands." Proc., 6th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Calif.
15. Krawinkler, H., and Nassar, A. A. (1992). "Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities." Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds., Elsevier, New York.
16. MATLAB: The language of technical computing, Version 5.0. (1997). The Mathworks Inc., Natick, Mass.
17. Miranda, E. (1991). "Seismic evaluation and upgrading of existing structures." PhD thesis, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
18. Miranda, E. (1993). "Evaluation Of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra." J. Struct. Eng., 119(5), 1319-1338.
19. Miranda, E. (2000). "Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites." J. Struct. Eng., 126(10), 1150-1159.
20. Miranda, E. (2001). "Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems." J. Struct. Eng., 127(9), 1005-1012.
21. Nassar, A. A., and Krawinkler, H. (1991). "Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems." Rep. No. 95, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
22. Newmark, N. M., and Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
23. Qi, X., and Moehle, J. P. (1991). "Displacement design approach for reinforced concrete structures subjected to earthquakes." Rep. No. EERC-91/02, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
24. Riddell, R., Garcia, J. E., and Garces, E. (2002). "Inelastic deformation response of SDOF systems subjected to earthquakes." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 515-538.
25. Riddell, R., and Newmark, N. M. (1979). "Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes." Structural Res. Series No. 468, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
26. Ruiz-Garcia, J., and Miranda, E. (2003). "Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(8), 1237-1258.
27. Shimazaki, K., and Sozen, M. A. (1984). "Seismic drift of reinforced concrete structures." Tech. Research Rep. Prepared for Hazama-Gumi Ltd., Tokyo, 145-166.
28. Somerville, P. G. (1998). "Development of an improved representation of near-fault ground motions." Proc., SM1P98 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data, California Division of Mines and Geology, Oakland, Calif., 1-20.
29. Song, J. K., and Pincheira, J. A. (2000). "Spectral displacement demands of stiffness- and strength-degrading systems." Earthquake Spectra, 16(4), 817-851.
30. Veletsos, A. S. (1969). "Maximum deformations of certain nonlinear systems." Proc., 4th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chilean Association on Seismic and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. II, Santiago, Chile, A4-155-A4-170.
31. Veletsos, A. S., and Newmark, N. M. (1960). "Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions." Proc., 2nd World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. II, Tokyo, 895-912.
32. Veletsos, A. S., and Newmark, N. M. (1964). "Response spectra for single-degree-of-freedom elastic and inelastic systems." Rep. No. RTD-TDR-63-3096, Vol. III, Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Albuquerque, N.M.
33. Veletsos, A. S., Newmark, N. M., and Chepalati, C. V. (1965). "Deformation spectra for elastic and elastoplastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motion." Proc., 3rd World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. II, Wellington, New Zealand, 663-682.
34. Veletsos, A. S., and Vann, W. P. (1971). "Response of ground-excited elastoplastic systems." J. Struct. Div. ASCE, 97(4), 1257-1281.
35. Whittaker, A., Constantinou, M., and Tsopelas, P. (1998). "Displacement 'estimates for performance-based seismic design." J. Struct. Eng., 124(8), 905-912.