Optimizing cardiac MR imaging: Practical remedies for artifacts

Radiographics

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1161-1187

  Saremi, Farhood ^a   Grizzard, John D ^b   Kim, Raymond J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HEART DISEASE; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL;

ARTIFACTS; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MYOCARDIUM; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 53149110486     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.284065718     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Sakuma H, Fujita N, Foo TK, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breath-hold cine MR imaging. Radiology 1993;188:377-380.
2. Lanzer P, Barta C, Botvinick EH, Wiesendanger HU, Modin G, Higgins CB. ECG-synchronized cardiac MR imaging: method and evaluation. Radiology 1985;155:681-686.
3. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, et al. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:264-269.
4. Atkinson DJ, Edelman R. Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented TurboFLASH sequence. Radiology 1991;178: 357-360.
5. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, Finn JP. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 2001;219:828-834.
6. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:757-762.
7. Reeder SB, Atalar E, Faranesh AZ, McVeigh ER. Multi-echo segmented k-space imaging: an optimized hybrid sequence for ultrafast cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;41(2):375-385.
8. Epstein FH, Wolff SD, Arai AE. Segmented k-space fast cardiac imaging using an echo-train readout. Magn Reson Med 1999;41(3):609-661.
9. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453.
10. Wood ML, Henkelman RM. Artifacts. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG Jr, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1999; 215-230.
11. Taylor AM, Jhooti P, Wiesmann F, Keegan J, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. MR navigator-echo monitoring of temporal changes in diaphragm position: implications for MR coronary angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7(4):629-636.
12. Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Novel realtime R-wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(2): 361-370.
13. Hennig J. Generalized MR interferography. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:390-402.
14. Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. RadioGraphics 2006;26(1):275-297.
15. Lee VS, Resnick D, Bundy JM, Simonetti OP, Lee P, Weinreb JC. Cardiac function: MR evaluation in one breath hold with real-time true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 2002;222: 835-842.
16. Barkhausen J, Goyen M, Rühm SG, Eggebrecht H, Debatin JF, Ladd ME. Assessment of ventricular function with single breath-hold real-time steady-state free precession cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:731-735.
17. Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, Kramer U, Finn JP. MR imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: infuence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 2002;223:263-269.
18. Spuentrup E, Schroeder J, Mahnken AH, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with interactive real-time spiral and radial MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:870-876.
19. Scheffer K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol 2003;13(11):2409-2418.
20. Nayak KS, Hargreaves BA, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM, Meyer CH. Spiral balanced steady-state free precession cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53(6):1468-1473.
21. Reeder SB, Faranesh AZ, Boxerman JL, McVeigh ER. In vivo measurement of T*2 and feld inhomo-geneity maps in the human heart at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 1998;39(6):988-998.
22. Atalay MK, Poncelet BP, Kantor HL, Brady TJ, Weisskoff RM. Cardiac susceptibility artifacts arising from the heart-lung interface. Magn Reson Med 2001;45(2):341-345.
23. Markl M, Alley M, Elkins C, Pelc N. Flow effects in balanced steady state free precession imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:892-903.
24. Li W, Storey P, Chen Q, Li BS, Prasad PV, Edel-man RR. Dark fow artifacts with steady-state free precession cine MR technique: causes and implications for cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 230:569-575.
25. Wansapura J, Fleck R, Crotty E, Gottliebson W. Frequency scouting for cardiac imaging with SSFP at 3 Tesla. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36(10):1082-1085.
26. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591-603.
27. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
28. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47: 1202-1210.
29. Griswold MA, Kannengiesser S, Heidemann RM, Wang J, Jakob PM. Field-of-view limitations in parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;52(5): 1118-1126.
30. Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA. A generalized approach to parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 2001;28:1629-1643.
31. Hinton DP, Wald LL, Pitts J, et al. Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems. Invest Radiol 2003;38:436-442.
32. Greenman RL, Shirosky JE, Mulkern RV, et al. Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5 T and 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17: 648-655.
33. McGee KP, Debbins JP, Boskamp EB, Blawat L, Angelos L, King KF. Cardiac magnetic resonance parallel imaging at 3.0 Tesla: technical feasibility and advantages. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19(3):291-297.
34. Goldfarb J W. The SENSE ghost: feld-of-view restrictions for SENSE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20(6):1046-1051.
35. Park J, Zhang Q, Jellus V, Simonetti O, Li D. Artifact and noise suppression in GRAPPA imaging using improved k-space coil calibration and variable density sampling. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53(1):186-193.
36. Kellman P, Epstein FH, McVeigh ER. Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal fl-tering (TSENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001;45: 846-852.
37. Madore B, Glover GH, Pelc NJ. Unaliasing by Fourier-encoding the overlaps using the temporal dimension (UNFOLD), applied to cardiac imaging and fMRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:813-828.
38. Breuer FA, Kellman P, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. Dynamic autocalibrated parallel imaging using temporal GRAPPA (TGRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2005;53(4):981-985.
39. Epstein FH, London JF, Peters DC, et al. Multislice frst-pass cardiac perfusion MRI: validation in a model of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:482-491.
40. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, Mohrs OK, Kreitner KF, Thelen M. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:641-652.
41. Wang Y, Moin K, Akinboboye O, Reichek N. Myo-cardial frst pass perfusion: steady-state free precession versus spoiled gradient echo and segmented echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;54: 1123-1129.
42. Storey P, Chen Q, Li W, Edelman RR, Prasad PV. Band artifacts due to bulk motion. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:1028-1036.
43. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Jochims M, Debatin JF. Imaging of myocardial perfusion with magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19: 750-757.
44. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1295-1299.
45. Glockner JF, Hu HH, Stanley DW, Angelos L, King K. Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide. RadioGraphics 2005;25:1279-1297.
46. Neimatallah MA, Chenevert TL, Carlos RC, et al. Subclavian MR arteriography: reduction of susceptibility artifact with short echo time and dilute gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 2000;217: 581-586.
47. Ba-Ssalamah A, Nobauer-Huhmann IM, Pinker K, et al. Effect of contrast dose and feld strength in the magnetic resonance detection of brain metasta-ses. Invest Radiol 2003;38(7):415-422.
48. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic signifcance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97(8): 765-772.
49. Lima JA, Judd RM, Bazille A, Schulman SP, Atalar E, Zerhouni EA. Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. Circulation 1995;92(5):1117-1125.
50. Rochitte CE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;98(10):1006-1014.
51. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218: 215-223.
52. Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5:505-514.
53. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH. Phase sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 2002;47: 372-383.
54. Huber AM, Schoenberg SO, Hayes C, et al. Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR imaging in the detection of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2005; 237(3):854-860.
55. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Holly TA, et al. Repro-ducibility of chronic infarct size measurement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002;106:2322-2327.
56. Gutberlet M, Noeske R, Schwinge K, Freyhardt P, Felix R, Niendorf T. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: feasibility and implications for clinical applications. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2):154-167.
57. Huber A, Schoenberg SO, Spannagl B, et al. Single-shot inversion recovery TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(3):627-633.
58. Noll DC, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:154-163.
59. Underwood SR, Firmin DN, Klipstein RH, Rees RS, Longmore DB. Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. Br Heart J 1987;57:404-412.
60. Spritzer CE, Pelc NJ, Lee JN, Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Riederer SJ. Rapid MR imaging of blood fow with a phase-sensitive, limited-fip-angle, gradient recalled pulse sequence: preliminary experience. Radiology 1990;176:255-262.
61. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. Cardiovascular fow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. RadioGraphics 2002;22:651-671.
62. Tang C, Blatter DD, Parker DL. Accuracy of phase contrast fow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3: 377-385.
63. Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, Laub G, Henry DA. "Black blood" T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology 1996;199(1): 49-57.
64. Edwards MB, Taylor KM, Shellock FG. Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic feld interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:363-369.
65. Bartels LW, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, fow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:365-371.
66. Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Non-susceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5: 75-88.