Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with interactive real-time spiral and radial MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 227, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 870-876

  Spuentrup, Elmar ^a   Schroeder, Joerg ^a   Mahnken, Andreas H ^a   Schaeffter, Tobias ^b   Botnar, Rene M ^c,d   Kühl, Harald P ^a   Hanrath, Peter ^a   Günther, Rolf W ^a   Buecker, Arno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Germany)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Heart, ventricles Magnetic resonance (MR), cine study; Magnetic resonance (MR), functional imaging; Magnetic resonance (MR), volume measurement; Myocardium, MR

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDIUM; EPICARDIUM; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIUM; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0038287583     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2273020303     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder P, Higgins CB. Quantification of cardiac function by conventional and cine magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1987; 10:365-373.
2. Atkinson DJ, Edelman RR. Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence. Radiology 1991; 178:357-360.
3. Sakuma H, Fujita N, Foo TK, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breath-hold cine MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 188:377-380.
4. Mohiaddin RH, Longmore DB. Functional aspects of cardiovascular nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: techniques and application. Circulation 1993; 88: 264-281.
5. Peshock RM, Willett DL, Sayad DE, et al. Quantitative MR imaging of the heart. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1996; 4:287-305.
6. Schalla S, Nagel E, Lehmkuhl H, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance realtime imaging of left ventricular function with conventional magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:95-99.
7. Setser RM, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH. Quantification of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance images acquired in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:430-438.
8. Nagel E, Schneider U, Schalla S, et al. Magnetic resonance real-time imaging for the evaluation of left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000; 2:7-14.
9. Plein S, Smith WH, Ridgway JP, et al. Measurements of left ventricular dimensions using real-time acquisition in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with conventional gradient echo imaging. MAGMA 2001; 13:101-108.
10. Yang PC, Kerr AB, Liu AC, et al. New real-time interactive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging system complements echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:2049-2056.
11. Kaii S, Yang PC, Kerr AB, et al. Rapid evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass without breath-holding using realtime interactive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging system. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:527-533.
12. Schaeffter T, Weiss S, Eggers H, Rasche V. Projection reconstruction balanced fast field echo for interactive real-time cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 1238-1241.
13. Shankaranarayanan A, Simonetti OP, Laub G, Lewin JS, Duerk JL. Segmented k-space and real-time cardiac cine MR imaging with radial trajectories. Radiology 2001; 221:827-836.
14. Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Schaeffter T, Manning WJ, Gunther RW, Buecker A. Magnetic resonance-guided coronary artery stent placement in a swine model. Circulation 2002; 105:874-879.
15. Eggers H, Proksa R. Multiprocessor system for real-time convolution interpolation reconstruction (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999; 95.
16. Oppelt A, Graumann R, Barfuss H, Fischer H, Hartl W, Shajor W. FISP: a new fast MRI sequence. Electromedica 1986; 54: 15-18.
17. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:264-269.
18. Plein S, Bloomer TN, Ridgway JP, Jones TR, Bainbridge GJ, Sivananthan MU. Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: comparison with segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 230-236.
19. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, Finn JP. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 2001; 219:828-834.
20. Spuentrup E, Kuehl HP, Wall A, Heer C, Buecker A. Visualization of cardiac myxoma mobility with real-time spiral magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2001; 104:E101.
21. Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee JN, Wright RC, Herfkens RJ. MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 1988; 8:1-15.
22. Weber OM, Eggers H, Spiegel MA, Scheidegger MB, Proksa R, Boesiger P. Real-time interactive magnetic resonance imaging with multiple coils for the assessment of left ventricular function. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:826-832.
23. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Gould RG, Cassidy MM, Higgins CB. Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 163:697-702.
24. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105: 539-542.
25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
26. Wiesmann F, Gatehouse PD, Panting JR, Taylor AM, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. Comparison of fast spiral, echo planar, and fast low-angle shot MRI for cardiac volumetry at .5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:1033-1039.
27. Atalay MK, Poncelet BP, Kantor HL, Brady TJ, Weisskoff RM. Cardiac susceptibility artifacts arising from the heart-lung interface. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45:341-345.
28. Larson AC, Simonetti OP. Real-time cardiac cine imaging with SPIDER: steadystate projection imaging with dynamic echo-train readout. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46:1059-1066.
29. Glover GH, Pauly JM. Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1992; 28:275-289.
30. Rasche V, de Boer RW, Holz D, Proksa R. Continuous radial data acquisition for dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:754-761.
31. Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wendt M, Petersilge C. Remember true FISP? A high SNR, near 1-second imaging method for T2-like contrast in interventional MRI at .2 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:203-208.
32. Plein S, Smith WH, Ridgway JP, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of regional left ventricular wall dynamics using real-time magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with conventional breath-hold gradient echo acquisition in volunteers and patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:23-30.
33. Taylor AM, Keegan J, Jhooti P, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. Differences between normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease for three different MR coronary angiography respiratory suppression techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:786-793.