On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1295-1299

  Di Bella, Edward V R ^a   Parker, D L ^a   Sinusas, A J ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact; Dark rim; Dynamic contrast MRI; Filtering; Myocardial perfusion imaging

Indexed keywords

FILTRATION; GADOLINIUM;

ARTIFACT; DYNAMIC CONTRAST; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PERFUSION STUDIES; RESOLUTION EFFECTS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

GADOLINIUM;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DOG; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; MOTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 27644587498     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20666     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knusel PR, Marincek B, Luscher TF, Schulthess GKV. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance. A comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235.
2. Lee DC, Simonetti OP, Harris KR, Holly TA, Judd RM, Wu E, Klocke FJ. Magnetic resonance versus radionuclide pharmacological stress perfusion imaging for flow-limiting stenoses of varying severity. Circulation 2004;110:58-65.
3. Muehling OM, Wilke NM, Panse P, Jerosch-Herold M, Wilson BV, Wilson RF, Miller LW. Reduced myocardial perfusion reserve and transmural perfusion gradient in heart transplant arteriopathy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1054-1060.
4. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Jochims M, Debatin JF. Imaging of myocardial perfusion with magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19: 750-757.
5. Storey P, Chen Q, Li W, Edelman RR, Prasad PV. Band artifacts due to bulk motion. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:1028-1036.
6. Markl M, Alley MT, Elkins CJ, Pelc NJ. Flow effects in balanced steady state free precession imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:892-903.
7. Storey P, Li W, Chen Q, Edelman RR. Flow artifacts in steady-state free precession cine imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:115-122.
8. Parker DL, Gullberg GT, Frederick PR. Gibbs artifact removal in magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1987;14:640-645.
9. Archibald R, Gelb A. A method to reduce the Gibbs ringing artifact in MRI scans while keeping tissue boundary integrity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:305-319.
10. Neimatallah MA, Chenevert TL, Carlos RC, Londy FJ, Dong Q, Prince MR, Kim HM. Subclavian MR arteriography: reduction of susceptibility artifact with short echo time and dilute gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 2000;217:581-586.
11. Weber OM. On artifacts in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Soc Card Magn Res, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005;7:111-112.
12. Welford WT. The visual Mach effect. Physics Educ 1968;3:83-84.
13. Fenchel M, Helber U, Simonetti OP, Stauder NI, Kramer U, Nguyen CN, Finn JP, Claussen CD, Miller S. Multislice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison of saturation recovery (SR)-TrueFISP-two-dimensional (2D) and SR-TurboFLASH-2D pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:555-563.
14. DiBella EVR. Spatial resolution and blood-to-myocardium contrast effects in perfusion studies. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Soc Card Magn Res, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005;7:279-281.