Learner metalinguistic reflections following output-oriented and reflective activities

Language Awareness

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 131-146

  Suzuki, Wataru ^a   Itagaki, Nobuya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MIYAGI UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cognitive comparison; Feedback; Metalinguistic reflection; Output

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249159316     PISSN: 09658416     EISSN: 17477506     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2167/la392.0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S. and Ellis, R. (2002) Metalanguage in focus on form in communicative classroom. Language Awareness 11,1-13.
2. Berry, R. (2005) Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness 14 (1), 3-20.
3. Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983) The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
4. Centeno-Cortez, B. and Jimenez Jimenez, A.F. (2004) Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of the L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14 (1), 7-35.
5. Cohen, A. (1984) On taking language tests: What the students report. Language Testing 1 (1), 70-81.
6. Cumming, A. (1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication 7 (4), 482-511.
7. de Guerrero, M.C.M. (2004) Early stages of L2 inner speech development: What verbal reports suggest. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14 (1), 90-112.
8. DiCamilla, F.J. and Anton, M. (2004) Private speech: A study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14 (1), 36-69.
9. Doughty, C. (2001) Cognitive underpinning of focus on form. In P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Ellis, R. (2003) Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Fortune, A. (2005) Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness 14 (1), 21-38.
12. Fortune, A. and Thorp, D. (2001) Knotted and entangled: New light on the identification, classification and value of language related episodes in collaborative output tasks. Language Awareness 10 (2&3), 143-160.
13. Garcia Mayo, M.P. (2002) Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research 37 (2), 323-341.
14. Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (2000) Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Itagaki, N., Sugiyama, M. and Kubota, Y. (2003) Analysis of metalinguistic talk in grammar exercises: On the basis of the theoretical framework of the output hypothesis. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan 14, 31-40.
16. Izumi, S. (2002) Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (4), 541-577.
17. Izumi, S. (2003) Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics 24 (2), 168-196.
18. James, C. (1998) Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman.
19. Johnson, K. and Johnson, H. (eds) (1998) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching. London: Longman.
20. Leeser, M. (2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research 8 (1), 55-81.
21. Leow, R. and Morgan-Short, K. (2004) To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (1), 33-57.
22. Lyster, R. and Ranta, L. (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1), 37-66.
23. Malmqvist, A. (2005) How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output? Language Awareness 14 (2&3), 128-141.
24. Schmidt, R. and Frota, S. (1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In R. Day (ed.) Taking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25. Sharwood Smith, M. (1981) Consciousness raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics 2 (2), 159-168.
26. Shehadeh, A. (2003) Learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic knowledge. System 31 (2), 155-171.
27. Storch, N. (2001) Comparing ESL learners’ attention to grammar on three different classroom tasks. RELC Journal 32 (2), 104-124.
28. Sugiyama, M., Itagaki, N. and Inose, F. (2002) An empirical study of the output hypothesis: ’Metatalk,’ ’noticing,’ and ’hypothesis-testing’. The Bulletin of the Tohoku English Language Education Society 22, 87-99.
29. Sullivan, J. and Caplan, N. (2004) Beyond the dictogloss: Learner-generated attention to form in a collaborative, communicative classroom activity. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 19 (1), 65-89.
30. Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds) Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. Swain, M. (1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review 50 (1), 158-164.
32. Swain, M. (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (eds) Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Swain, M. (1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Swain, M. (2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In P. Lantolf (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Swain, M. (2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (ed.) The Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1982) Evaluating Bilingual Education: A Canadian Case Study. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
37. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16 (3), 371-391.
38. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal 82 (3), 320-337.
39. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2000) Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research 4 (3), 251-274.
40. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain (eds) Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow: Longman.
41. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37 (3&4), 285-304.
42. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (in press) ’Oh, I get it now!’ From production to comprehension in second language learning. In D.M. Brinton and O. Kagan (eds) Heritage Language Acquisition: A New Field Emerging. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Tayler, G. (1986) Errors and explanations. Applied Linguistics 7 (2), 144-166.
44. Williams, J. (1999) Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning 49 (4), 583-625.