GreekLex: A lexical database of Modern Greek

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 773-783

  Ktori, Maria ^a   Van Heuven, Walter J B ^a   Pitchford, Nicola J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; FACTUAL DATABASE; GREECE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; GREECE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; VOCABULARY;

EID: 50849135862     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.773     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. ACHA, J., & PEREA, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposedletter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264.
2. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
3. ANDREWS, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 234-254.
4. ANDREWS, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 775-800.
5. ANDREWS, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
6. ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI, INSTITUTE FOR MODERN GREEK STUDIES (1998). Lexicon of common Modem Greek. Thessaloniki: Author.
7. BAAYEN, R. H., DUKSTRA, T., & SCHREUDER, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 94-117.
8. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
9. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & VAN RIJN, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (Release 1) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
10. BALOTA, D. A. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303-358). San Diego: Academic Press. BALOTA, D. A., CORTESE, M. J., SERGENT-MARSHALL, S. D., SPIELER, D. H., & YAP, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316.
11. BARCA, L., BURANI, C, & ARDUINO, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 424-434.
12. BOWERS, J. S., DAVIS, C. J., & HANLEY, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 131-143.
13. CARREIRAS, M., PEREA, M., & GRAINGER, J. (1997). Effects of the orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 857-871.
14. CHAMBERS, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
15. COLTHEART, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505.
16. COLTHEART, M., BESNER, D., JONASSON, J. T., & DAVELAAR, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489-507.
17. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. CONTENT, A., MOUSTY, P., & RADEAU, M. (1990). BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé [A lexical computerized database for written and spoken French]. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
19. DAVIS, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65-70.
20. DAVIS, C. J., & PEREA, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671.
21. DAVIS, C. J., & PEREA, M. (2008). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighbourhood: Evidence for the similarity of addition and deletion neighbours in Spanish. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. DAVIS, C. J., & TAFT, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 904-910.
23. DE MOOR, W., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159-162.
24. DUYCK, W., DESMET, T., VERBEKE, L. P. C., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2004). WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 36, 488-499.
25. FELDMAN, L. B., FROST, R., PNINI, T. & (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 947-960.
26. FORSTER, K. I., & SHEN, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 696-713.
27. GRAINGER, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 228-244.
28. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
29. HATZIGEORGIU, N., MIKROS, G., & CARAYANNIS, G. (2001). Word length, word frequencies and Zipf's Law in the Greek language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8, 175-185.
30. HAUK, O., & PULVERMÜLLER, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103.
31. HOFMANN, M. J., STENNEKEN, P., CONRAD, M., & JACOBS, A. M. (2007). Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 620-629.
32. HOLCOMB, P. J., GRAINGER, J., & O'ROURKE, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938-950.
33. HUMPHREYS, G. W., EVETT, L. J., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
34. HYÖNÄ, J., & POLLATSEK, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
35. JONES, M. N. (2001). T-REX: A template-resonance excitation model of single letter classification. Unpublished master's thesis, Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
36. JONES, M. N., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (2004). Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 388-396.
37. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
38. LONKE, M., MARTENSEN, H., VAN HEUVEN, W. J. B., & SANDRA, D. (in press). Who is dominating the Dutch neighbourhood? On the role of subsyllabic units in Dutch nonword reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
39. LUPKER, S. J., PEREA, M., & DAVIS, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116.
40. MACKRIDGE, P. (1985). The Modern Greek language: A descriptive analysis of standard Modern Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. MAYZNER, M. S., & TRESSELT, M. E. (1965). Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1(Whole No. 2), 13-32.
42. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981 ). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-405.
43. MIKROS, G., HATZIGEORGIU, N., & CARAYANNIS, G. (2005). Basic quantitative characteristics of the Modern Greek language using the Hellenic National Corpus. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12, 167-184.
44. MONSELL, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. NEW, B., BRYSBAERT, M., SEGUI, J., FERRAND, L., & RASTLE, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 568-585.
46. NEW, B., FERRAND, L., PALUER, C., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45-52.
47. NEW, B., PALLIER, C., BRYSBAERT, M., & FERRAND, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516-524.
48. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
49. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
50. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 231-246.
51. PEREA, M., & POLLATSEK, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 767-779.
52. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (2000). The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review, Psicológica, 21, 327-340.
53. PEREA, M., URKIA, M., DAVIS, C. J., AGIRRE, A., LASEKA, E., & CARREIRAS, M. (2006). E-Hitz: A word frequency list and a program for deriving psycholinguistic statistics in an agglutinative language (Basque). Behavior Research Methods, 38, 610-615.
54. SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYEN, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 118-139.
55. SEARS, C. R., HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood frequency and neighborhood size effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 876-900.
56. SEBASTIÁN-GALLÉS, N., MARTI, M. A., CUETOS, F., & CARREIRAS, M. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico informarizado del español. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universität de Barcelona.
57. SEIDENBERG, M. S., WATERS, G. S., BARNES, M. A., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
58. SOLSO, R. L., & JUEL, C. L. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 297-343.
59. TAFT, M., & VAN GRAAN, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory & language, 38, 203-224.
60. VAN HEUVEN, W. J. B., & DIJKSTRA, T. (2005). Extended neighborhood effects in visual word recognition. Poster presented at the 14th Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
61. VAN HEUVEN, W. J. B., DUKSTRA, T., & GRAINGER, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 458-483.
62. VINCENT, R. D., GOLDBERG, Y. K., & TITONE, D. A. (2006). Anagram software for cognitive research that enables specification of psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 196-201.
63. WESTBURY, C., & BUCHANAN, L. (2002). The probability of the least likely non-length-controlled bigram affects lexical decision reaction times. Brain & Language, 81, 66-78.
64. ZIEGLER, J. C., & GOSWAMI, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.