Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 388-396

  Jones, Michael N ^a   Mewhort, D J K ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344335940     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195586     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. APPELMAN, I. B., & MAYZNER, M. S. (1981). The letter-frequency effect and the generality of familiarity effects on perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 436-446.
2. BADDELEY, A. D., CONRAD, R., & THOMPSON, W. E. (1960). Letter structure in the English language. Nature, 186, 414-416.
3. BOUMA, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lowercase letters. Vision Research, 11, 459-474.
4. BROADBENT, D. E. (1967). Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review, 74, 1-15.
5. BROADBENT, D. E., & GREGORY, M. (1968). Visual perception of words differing in letter digram frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7, 569-571.
6. BRYDEN, M. P. (1968). Symmetry of letters as a factor in tachistoscopic recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 513-524.
7. COSKY, M. J. (1976). The role of letter recognition in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 4, 207-214.
8. DOMINOWSKI, R. L., & DUNCAN, C. P. (1964). Anagram solving as a function of bigram frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 3, 321-325.
9. EGETH, H., & BLECKER, D. (1971). Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference. Perception & Psychophysics, 9(4), 321-326.
10. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1972). Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 169-171.
11. ESTES, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 278-286.
12. GAINES, H. F. (1939). Cryptanalysis: A study of ciphers and their solutions. New York: Dover.
13. GEYER, L. H. (1977). Recognition and confusion of the lowercase alphabet. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 487-490.
14. GILMORE, G. C., HERSH, H., CARAMAZZA, A., & GRIFFIN, J. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425-431.
15. HOWES, D. H., & SOLOMON, R. L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.
16. JONES, M. N. (2001). T-REX: A template-resonance excitation model of single letter classification. Master's thesis, Queen's University at Kingston.
17. KRUEGER, L. E. (1970). Effect of bracketing lines on speed of "same""different" judgments of two adjacent letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 324-330.
18. KRUEGER, L. E. (1973a). Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of "same-different" judgments of two adjacent letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 252-259.
19. KRUEGER, L. E. (1973b). Effect of letter-pair frequency and orientation of speed of "same"-"different" judgments by children and adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 431-433.
20. KRUEGER, L. E. (1973c). Effect of stimulus frequency on speed of "same"-"different" judgments. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 497-506). New York: Academic Press.
21. KRUEGER, L. E. (1975). Familiarity effects in visual information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 949-974.
22. KRUEGER, L. E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 278-304.
23. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present- day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
24. LATIMER, C. R. (1972). Search time as a function of context letter frequency. Perception, 1, 57-71.
25. MAYZNER, M. S., & TRESSELT, M. E. (1965). Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1 (Whole No. 2), 13-32.
26. MEWHORT, D. J. K., & CAMPBELL, A. J. (1981). Toward a model of skilled reading: An analysis of performance in tachistoscopic tasks. In G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3, pp. 39-118). New York: Academic Press.
27. MILLER, G. A., BRUNER, J. S., & POSTMAN, L. (1954). Familiarity of letter sequences and tachistoscopic identification. Journal of General Psychology, 50, 129-139.
28. NICKERSON, R. S. (1965). Response times for same-different judgments. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 20, 15-18.
29. NICKERSON, R. S. (1973). Frequency, recency, and repetition effects on same and different response times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 330-336.
30. PERESSOTTI, F., CUBELLI, R., & JOB, R. (2003). On recognizing proper names: The orthographic cue hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 87-116.
31. POSNER, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. POSNER, M. I., & MITCHELL, R. F. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review, 74, 392-409.
33. PROCTOR, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88, 291-326.
34. RICE, G. A., & ROBINSON, D. O. (1975). The role of Digram frequency in the perception of words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 3, 513-518.
35. SOLSO, R. L., & KING, J. F. (1976). Frequency and versatility of letters in the English language. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 8, 283-286.
36. STEIGER, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
37. TINKER, M. A. (1928). The relative legibility of the letters, the digits, and of certain mathematical signs. Journal of General Psychology, 1, 472-495.
38. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40-50.
39. VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C., MALHAS, M. S. M., & VAN DEN ROOVAART, B. P. (1984). An empirical interletter confusion matrix for continuous-line capitals. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 85-88.
40. WILLIAMS, E. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 21, 396-399.