Who is dominating the dutch neighbourhood? on the role of subsyllabic units in dutch nonword reading

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 140-154

  Loncke, Maaike ^a   Martensen, Heike ^b   Van Heuven, Walter J B ^c   Sandra, Dominiek ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interactive activation model; Lexical decision; Orthographic neighbourhood; Rime; Simulations; Subsyllabic units

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; READING;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149327317     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701851206     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighbourhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. Andrews, S, (1992). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775 - 800.
4. Andrews, S. (1997). The effects of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
6. Booth, J. R., & Perfetti, C. A. (2002). Onset and rime structure influences naming but not early word identification in children and adults. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 1-23.
7. Bowers, J. S. Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131-143.
8. Bowey, J. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading. Memory & Cognition, 18, 419-427.
9. Bowey, J. A. (1993). Orthographic rime priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 247-271.
10. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 857-871.
11. Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
12. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Matt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
13. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
15. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
16. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535-557.
17. Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 904-910.
18. De Moor, W., &Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighbourhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159-162.
19. Derwing, B. L., Yoon, Y. B., & Cho, S. W. (1993). The organization of the Korean syllable: Experimental evidence. Japanese and Korean Linguistics, 2, 223-238.
20. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696-713.
21. Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighbourhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 844-863.
22. Geudens, A., & Sandra, D. (1999). Onsets and rimes in a phonologically transparent orthography: Differences between good and poor beginning readers of Dutch. Brain and Language, 68, 284-290.
23. Geudens, A., & Sandra, D. (2002). The role of the orthographic onset-rime units in Dutch beginning readers. In L. Verhoeven, P. Reitsma, & C. Elbro (Eds.), Precursors of Junctional literacy (pp. 49-67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Geudens, A., & Sandra, D. (2003). Beyond children's implicit phonological knowledge: No support for an onset-rime structure in children's explicit phonological awareness. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 157-182.
25. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and language, 29, 228-244.
26. Grainger, J., Granier, J.-P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
27. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
28. Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 981-998.
29. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
30. Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
31. Grainger, J., &Van Heuven, W.J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon. New York; Nova Science.
32. Huntsman, L. A., & Lima, S. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 413-425.
33. Huntsman, L. A., & Lima, S. D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 289-306.
34. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 295-311.
35. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 592-617.
36. Martensen, M., Maris, E., &Dijkstra, T. (2000). When does inconsistency hurt? On the relation between phonological consistency effects and the reliability of sublexical units. Memory & Cognition, 28, 648-656.
37. Martensen, H., Maris, E., & Dijkstra, T. (2003). Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 375-395.
38. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
39. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighbourhoods in naming: Not all neighbours are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 382-410.
40. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification taks: A review, Psicológica, 21, 327-340.
41. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C, & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental development of computational theories: The CDP + model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273 -315.
42. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
43. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighbourhood size and neighbourhood frequency effects in word recognition, journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception & Performance, 21, 876-900.
44. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 281-327). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
45. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., &Bick, S. (2003). Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models. Cognition, 88, 49- 78.
46. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
47. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466-477.
48. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
49. Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighbourhood: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, B53-B62.