Closely related antibody receptors exploit fundamentally different strategies for steroid recognition

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 105, Issue 33, 2008, Pages 11725-11730

  Verdino, Petra ^a   Aldag, Caroline ^b   Hilvert, Donald ^b   Wilson, Ian A ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Antibody antigen complex; Modulation of receptor specificity; Molecular recognition; Protein engineering; X ray crystallography

Indexed keywords

1E9 ANTIBODY; ANTIBODY; ARGININE; DB3 ANTIBODY; LEUCINE; STEROID; STEROID RECEPTOR; TRYPTOPHAN;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ANTIBODY AFFINITY; ANTIBODY STRUCTURE; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEROID BINDING; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ANTIBODIES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTORS, IMMUNOLOGIC; STEROIDS;

EID: 50149089560     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801783105     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alt FW, Blackwell TK, Yancopoulos GD (1987) Development of the primary antibody repertoire. Science 238:1079-1087.
2. Wright LJ, Feinstein A, Heap RB, Saunders JC, Bennett RC, Wang MY (1982) Progesterone monoclonal antibody blocks pregnancy in mice. Nature 295:415-417.
3. Ellis ST, Heap RB, Butchart AR, Rider V, Richardson NE, Wang MW, Taussig MJ (1988) Efficacy and specificity of monoclonal antibodies to progesterone in preventing the establishment of pregnancy in the mouse. J Endocrinol 118:69-80.
4. Arevalo JH, Taussig MJ,Wilson IA (1993) Molecular basis of crossreactivity and the limits of antibody-antigen complementarity. Nature 365:859-863.
5. Arevalo JH, Stura EA, Taussig MJ, Wilson IA (1993) Three-dimensional structure of an anti-steroid Fab′ and progesterone-Fab′ complex. J Mol Biol 231:103-118.
6. Arevalo JH, et al. (1994) Structural analysis of antibody specificity. Detailed comparison of five Fab′-steroid complexes. J Mol Biol 241:663-690.
7. Hilvert D, Hill KW, Nared KD, Auditor M-TM (1989) Antibody catalysis of the Diels-Alder reaction. J Am Chem Soc 111:9261-9262.
8. Xu J, et al. (1999) Evolution of shape complementarity and catalytic efficiency from a primordial antibody template. Science 286:2345-2348.
9. Chen J, Deng Q, Wang R, Houk KN, Hilvert D (2000) Shape complementarity, binding-site dynamics, and transition state stabilization: A theoretical study of Diels-Alder catalysis by antibody 1E9. Chembiochem 1:255-261.
10. Piatesi A, Hilvert D (2004) Immunological optimization of a generic hydrophobic pocket for high affinity hapten binding and Diels-Alder activity. Chembiochem 5:460-466.
11. Haynes MR, Lenz M, Taussig MJ, Wilson IA, Hilvert D (1996) Sequence similarity and cross-reactivity of a Diels-Alder catalyst and an anti-progesterone antibody. Isr J Chem 36:151-159.
12. Piatesi A, Aldag C, Hilvert D (2008) Switching antibody specificity through minimal mutation. J Mol Biol 377:993-1001.
13. Duax WL, Norton DA (1975) Atlas of Steroid Structures (Plenum, New York), Vol 1.
14. Griffin JF, Duax WL, Weeks CM (1984) Atlas of Steroid Structures (Plenum, New York), Vol 2.
15. Amzel LM, Poljak RJ (1979) Three-dimensional structure of immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Biochem 48:961-997.
16. Sekharudu C, et al. (1992) Crystal structure of the Y52F/Y73F double mutant of phospholipase A2: Increased hydrophobic interactions of the phenyl groups compensate for the disrupted hydrogen bonds of the tyrosines. Protein Sci 1:1585-1594.
17. Burks EA, Chen G, Georgiou G, Iverson BL (1997) In vitro scanning saturation mutagenesis of an antibody binding pocket. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:412-417.
18. He M, Hamon M, Liu H, Corper AL, Taussig MJ (2006) Effects of mutation at the D-JH junction on affinity, specificity, and idiotypy of anti-progesterone antibody DB3. Protein Sci 15:2141-2148.
19. Zahnd C, et al. (2004) Directed in vitro evolution and crystallographic analysis of a peptide-binding single chain antibody fragment (scFv) with low picomolar affinity. J Biol Chem 279:18870-18877.
20. Schildbach JF, et al. (1993) Modulation of antibody affinity by a non-contact residue. Protein Sci 2:206-214.
21. Jeffrey PD, et al. (1993) 26-10 Fab-digoxin complex: Affinity and specificity due to surface complementarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10310-10314.
22. Dubreuil O, et al. (2005) Fine tuning of the specificity of an anti-progesterone antibody by first and second sphere residue engineering. J Biol Chem 280:24880-24887.
23. Yuan L, Kurek I, English J, Keenan R (2005) Laboratory-directed protein evolution. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:373-392.
24. Joachimiak LA, Kortemme T, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2006) Computational design of a new hydrogen bond network and at least a 300-fold specificity switch at a protein-protein interface. J Mol Biol 361:195-208.
25. Xiao G, et al. (1996) First-sphere and second-sphere electrostatic effects in the active site of a class mu gluthathione transferase. Biochemistry 35:4753-4765.
26. Koh JT (2002) Engineering selectivity and discrimination into ligand-receptor interfaces. Chem Biol 9:17-23.
27. Dill KA (1990) Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 29:7133-7155.
28. Schneider, H.-J (1991) Mechanisms ofmolecular recognition : Investigations of organic host-guest complexes. Angew Chem 30:1417-1436.
29. Gani M, et al. (1994) Monoclonal antibodies against progesterone: Effect of steroid-carrier coupling position on antibody specificity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 48:277-282.