Decoding the quantitative nature of TGF-β/Smad signaling

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 430-442

  Clarke, David C ^a,b   Liu, Xuedong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; SMAD PROTEIN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

CANCER CELL; CELL NUCLEUS; DIFFUSION; DROSOPHILA; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINS; CELL NUCLEUS; DIMERIZATION; DROSOPHILA; LIGANDS; NEOPLASMS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SMAD PROTEINS; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

EID: 49849103199     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.06.006     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Lin X., et al. PPM1A functions as a Smad phosphatase to terminate TGFβ signaling. Cell 125 (2006) 915-928
2. Inman G.J., et al. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Smads 2, 3 and 4 permits sensing of TGF-β receptor activity. Mol. Cell 10 (2002) 283-294
3. Karlsson G., et al. Gene expression profiling demonstrates that TGF-β1 signals exclusively through receptor complexes involving Alk5 and identifies targets of TGF-β signaling. Physiol. Genomics 21 (2005) 396-403
4. Levy L., and Hill C.S. Smad4 dependency defines two classes of transforming growth factor (TGF-β) target genes and distinguishes TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition from its antiproliferative and migratory responses. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 8108-8125
5. Yang Y.C., et al. Hierarchical model of gene regulation by transforming growth factor β. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 10269-10274
6. Carcamo J., et al. Type I receptors specify growth-inhibitory and transcriptional responses to transforming growth factor β and activin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 3810-3821
7. Moustakas A., and Heldin C.H. Non-Smad TGF-β signals. J. Cell Sci. 118 (2005) 3573-3584
8. Rahimi R.A., and Leof E.B. TGF-β signaling: a tale of two responses. J. Cell. Biochem. 102 (2007) 593-608
9. Herpin A., and Cunningham C. Cross-talk between the bone morphogenetic protein pathway and other major signaling pathways results in tightly regulated cell-specific outcomes. FEBS J. 274 (2007) 2977-2985
10. Flanders K.C., and Roberts A. TGFβ. In: Oppenheim J.J., et al. (Ed). Cytokine Reference: a Compendium of Cytokines and Other Mediators of Host Defense Vol. 1 (2001), Academic Press 719-746
11. Sporn M.B., and Roberts A.B. Peptide growth factors are multifunctional. Nature 332 (1988) 217-219
12. Mabie P.C., et al. Multiple roles of bone morphogenetic protein signaling in the regulation of cortical cell number and phenotype. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 7077-7088
13. Wahl S.M., et al. Transforming growth factor type β induces monocyte chemotaxis and growth factor production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84 (1987) 5788-5792
14. Postlethwaite A.E., et al. Stimulation of the chemotactic migration of human fibroblasts by transforming growth factor β. J. Exp. Med. 165 (1987) 251-256
15. Gurdon J.B., and Bourillot P.Y. Morphogen gradient interpretation. Nature 413 (2001) 797-803
16. Roberts A.B., et al. Type β transforming growth factor: a bifunctional regulator of cellular growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82 (1985) 119-123
17. Pepper M.S., et al. Biphasic effect of transforming growth factor-β 1 on in vitro angiogenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 204 (1993) 356-363
18. Roberts A.B., et al. Transforming growth factor type β: rapid induction of fibrosis and angiogenesis in vivo and stimulation of collagen formation in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83 (1986) 4167-4171
19. Ignotz R.A., and Massague J. Transforming growth factor-β stimulates the expression of fibronectin and collagen and their incorporation into the extracellular matrix. J. Biol. Chem. 261 (1986) 4337-4345
20. Laiho M., et al. Enhanced production and extracellular deposition of the endothelial-type plasminogen activator inhibitor in cultured human lung fibroblasts by transforming growth factor-β. J. Cell Biol. 103 (1986) 2403-2410
21. Green J.B., et al. Responses of embryonic Xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm. Cell 71 (1992) 731-739
22. Piscione T.D., et al. BMP7 controls collecting tubule cell proliferation and apoptosis via Smad1-dependent and -independent pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 280 (2001) F19-F33
23. Weinstein M., and Deng C.-X. Genetic disruptions within the murine genome reveal numerous roles of the Smad gene family in development, disease, and cancer. In: ten Dijke P., and Heldin C.H. (Eds). Smad Signal Transduction: Smads in Proliferation, Differentiation and Disease Vol 5 (2006), Springer 151-176
24. Goumans M.J., and Mummery C. Functional analysis of the TGF-β receptor/Smad pathway through gene ablation in mice. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 44 (2000) 253-265
25. Nicolas F.J., and Hill C.S. Attenuation of the TGF-β-Smad signaling pathway in pancreatic tumor cells confers resistance to TGF-β-induced growth arrest. Oncogene 22 (2003) 3698-3711
26. Kim S.G., et al. The endogenous ratio of Smad2 and Smad3 influences the cytostatic function of Smad3. Mol. Biol. Cell 16 (2005) 4672-4683
27. Taylor I.W., and Wrana J.L. SnapShot: the TGF β pathway interactome. Cell 133 (2008) 378.e1
28. Ibanes M., and Belmonte J.C. Theoretical and experimental approaches to understand morphogen gradients. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4 (2008) 176
29. Barkai N., and Shilo B.Z. Variability and robustness in biomolecular systems. Mol. Cell 28 (2007) 755-760
30. Eldar A., et al. Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning. Nature 419 (2002) 304-308
31. Mizutani C.M., et al. Formation of the BMP activity gradient in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Cell 8 (2005) 915-924
32. Shimmi O., et al. Facilitated transport of a Dpp/Scw heterodimer by Sog/Tsg leads to robust patterning of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Cell 120 (2005) 873-886
33. Wang Y.C., and Ferguson E.L. Spatial bistability of Dpp-receptor interactions during Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning. Nature 434 (2005) 229-234
34. Umulis D.M., et al. Robust, bistable patterning of the dorsal surface of the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 11613-11618
35. Di Guglielmo G.M., et al. Distinct endocytic pathways regulate TGF-β receptor signalling and turnover. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 (2003) 410-421
36. Mitchell H., et al. Ligand-dependent and -independent transforming growth factor-β receptor recycling regulated by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and Rab11. Mol. Biol. Cell 15 (2004) 4166-4178
37. Vilar J.M., et al. Signal processing in the TGF-β superfamily ligand-receptor network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 (2006) e3
38. Zi Z., and Klipp E. Constraint-based modeling and kinetic analysis of the Smad dependent TGF-β signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e936
39. Schmierer B., and Hill C.S. Kinetic analysis of Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling reveals a mechanism for transforming growth factor β-dependent nuclear accumulation of Smads. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 9845-9858
40. Dudu V., et al. Postsynaptic mad signaling at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 625-635
41. Nicolas F.J., et al. Analysis of Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling in living cells. J. Cell Sci. 117 (2004) 4113-4125
42. Beaudouin J., et al. Dissecting the contribution of diffusion and interactions to the mobility of nuclear proteins. Biophys. J. 90 (2006) 1878-1894
43. Clarke D.C., et al. Systems theory of Smad signalling. Syst. Biol. (Stevenage) 153 (2006) 412-424
44. Bourillot P.Y., et al. A changing morphogen gradient is interpreted by continuous transduction flow. Development 129 (2002) 2167-2180
45. Dyson S., and Gurdon J.B. The interpretation of position in a morphogen gradient as revealed by occupancy of activin receptors. Cell 93 (1998) 557-568
46. Melke P., et al. A rate equation approach to elucidate the kinetics and robustness of the TGF-β pathway. Biophys. J. 91 (2006) 4368-4380
47. Schmierer B., et al. Mathematical modeling identifies Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling as a dynamic signal-interpreting system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008) 6608-6613
48. Xu L., et al. Msk is required for nuclear import of TGF-β/BMP-activated Smads. J. Cell Biol. 178 (2007) 981-994
49. Saka Y., et al. Nuclear accumulation of Smad complexes occurs only after the midblastula transition in Xenopus. Development 134 (2007) 4209-4218
50. Green J. Morphogen gradients, positional information, and Xenopus: interplay of theory and experiment. Dev. Dyn. 225 (2002) 392-408
51. Dallon J.C., et al. Modeling the effects of transforming growth factor-β on extracellular matrix alignment in dermal wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 9 (2001) 278-286
52. Ribba B., et al. A multiscale mathematical model of cancer, and its use in analyzing irradiation therapies. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 3 (2006) 7
53. O'Connor M.B., et al. Shaping BMP morphogen gradients in the Drosophila embryo and pupal wing. Development 133 (2006) 183-193
54. Feng X.H., and Derynck R. Specificity and versatility in TGF-β signaling through Smads. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21 (2005) 659-693
55. Chen H.B., et al. Nuclear targeting of transforming growth factor-β-activated Smad complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 21329-21336
56. Xu L., et al. The nuclear import function of Smad2 is masked by SARA and unmasked by TGFβ-dependent phosphorylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2 (2000) 559-562
57. Kurisaki A., et al. The mechanism of nuclear export of Smad3 involves exportin 4 and Ran. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 1318-1332
58. Ashe H.L., and Briscoe J. The interpretation of morphogen gradients. Development 133 (2006) 385-394
59. Affolter M., and Basler K. The Decapentaplegic morphogen gradient: from pattern formation to growth regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 (2007) 663-674
60. Hill C.S. TGF-β signalling pathways in early Xenopus development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11 (2001) 533-540
61. Wrana J.L., et al. TGF β signals through a heteromeric protein kinase receptor complex. Cell 71 (1992) 1003-1014
62. Wrana J.L., et al. Mechanism of activation of the TGF-β receptor. Nature 370 (1994) 341-347
63. Souchelnytskyi S., et al. Phosphorylation of Ser465 and Ser467 in the C terminus of Smad2 mediates interaction with Smad4 and is required for transforming growth factor-β signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997) 28107-28115
64. Liu X., et al. Transforming growth factor β-induced phosphorylation of Smad3 is required for growth inhibition and transcriptional induction in epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 10669-10674
65. Lagna G., et al. Partnership between DPC4 and SMAD proteins in TGF-β signalling pathways. Nature 383 (1996) 832-836
66. Chacko B.M., et al. Structural basis of heteromeric smad protein assembly in TGF-β signaling. Mol. Cell 15 (2004) 813-823
67. Valdimarsdottir G., et al. Smad7 and protein phosphatase 1 α are critical determinants in the duration of TGF-β/ALK1 signaling in endothelial cells. BMC Cell Biol. 7 (2006) 16
68. Itoh S., and Ten Dijke P. Negative regulation of TGF-β receptor/Smad signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19 (2007) 176-184
69. Pierreux C.E., et al. Transforming growth factor β-independent shuttling of Smad4 between the cytoplasm and nucleus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 9041-9054
70. Sible J.C., and Tyson J.J. Mathematical modeling as a tool for investigating cell cycle control networks. Methods 41 (2007) 238-247
71. Klipp E., and Liebermeister W. Mathematical modeling of intracellular signaling pathways. BMC Neurosci. 7 Suppl 1 (2006) S10
72. Mogilner A., et al. Quantitative modeling in cell biology: what is it good for? Dev. Cell 11 (2006) 279-287
73. Reeves G.T., et al. Quantitative models of developmental pattern formation. Dev. Cell 11 (2006) 289-300
74. Andrews S.S., and Arkin A.P. Simulating cell biology. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) R523-R527
75. He W., et al. Hematopoiesis controlled by distinct TIF1 γ and Smad4 branches of the TGF β pathway. Cell 125 (2006) 929-941
76. Massague J. The transforming growth factor-β family. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 6 (1990) 597-641
77. De Crescenzo G., et al. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) binding to the extracellular domain of the type II TGF-β receptor: receptor capture on a biosensor surface using a new coiled-coil capture system demonstrates that avidity contributes significantly to high affinity binding. J. Mol. Biol. 328 (2003) 1173-1183
78. Funaba M., and Mathews L.S. Identification and characterization of constitutively active Smad2 mutants: evaluation of formation of Smad complex and subcellular distribution. Mol. Endocrinol. 14 (2000) 1583-1591
79. Kavsak P., et al. Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF β receptor for degradation. Mol. Cell 6 (2000) 1365-1375
80. Groppe J., et al. Cooperative assembly of TGF-β superfamily signaling complexes is mediated by two disparate mechanisms and distinct modes of receptor binding. Mol. Cell 29 (2008) 157-168