Prevalence of intrinsic disorder in the intracellular region of human single-pass type i proteins: The case of the notch ligand delta-4

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 2496-2506

  De Biasio, Alfredo ^a   Guarnaccia, Corrado ^a   Popovic, Matija ^a   Uversky, Vladimir N ^b,c   Pintar, Alessandro ^a   Pongor, Sándor ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION   (Russian Federation)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intrinsic disorder; Notch signaling; PDZ binding motif; SDS micelles; Single pass transmembrane receptors; TFE

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MEMBRANE RECEPTOR; NOTCH RECEPTOR; PDZ PROTEIN; PROTEIN DELTA 4; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; DLL4 PROTEIN, HUMAN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CYTOPLASM; ENDOCYTOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; ELECTRICITY; GEL CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENETICS; HUMAN; HYDROPHOBICITY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EUKARYOTA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; ELECTROSTATICS; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBICITY; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 49849097024     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr800063u     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Tompa, P.; Szasz, C; Buday, L. Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2005, 30, 484-489.
2. Dyson, H. J.; Wright, P. E. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 6, 197-208.
3. Ward, J. J.; Sodhi, J. S.; McGuffin, L. J.; Buxton, B. F.; Jones, D. T. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 635-645.
4. Iakoucheva, L. M.; Brown, C. J.; Lawson, J. D.; Obradovic, Z.; Dunker, A. K. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer- associated proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 323, 573-584.
5. Mohan, A.; Oldfield, C. J.; Radivojac, P.; Vacic, V.; Cortese, M. S.; Dunker, A. K.; Uversky, V. N. Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 362, 1043-1059.
6. Minezaki, Y.; Homma, K.; Kinjo, A. R.; Nishikawa, K. Human transcription factors contain a high fraction of intrinsically disordered regions essential for transcriptional regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 359, 1137-1149.
7. Liu, J.; Perumal, N. B.; Oldfield, C. J.; Su, E. W.; Uversky, V. N.; Dunker, A. K. Intrinsic disorder in transcription factors. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 6873-6888.
8. Minezaki, Y.; Homma, K.; Nishikawa, K. Intrinsically disordered regions of human plasma membrane proteins preferentially occur in the cytoplasmic segment. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 902-913.
9. Hurlbut, G. D.; Kankel, M. W.; Lake, R. J.; Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. Crossing paths with Notch in the hyper-network. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007, 19, 166-175.
10. Bray, S. J. Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 7, 678-689.
11. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.; Rand, M. D.; Lake, R. J. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 1999, 284, 770-776.
12. Noguera-Troise, I.; Daly, C; Papadopoulos, N. J.; Coetzee, S.; Boland, P.; Gale, N. W.; Lin, H. C; Yancopoulos, G. D.; Thurston, G. Blockade of D114 inhibits tumour growth by promoting nonproductive angiogenesis. Nature 2006, 444, 1032-1037.
13. Ridgway, J.; Zhang, G.; Wu, Y.; Stawicki, S.; Liang, W. C; Chanthery, Y.; Kowalski, J.; Watts, R. J.; Callahan, C; Kasman, I.; Singh, M.; Chien, M.; Tan, C; Hongo, J. A.; de Sauvage, F.; Plowman, G.; Yan, M. Inhibition of Dll4 signalling inhibits tumour growth by deregulating angiogenesis. Nature 2006, 444, 1083-1087.
14. Letunic, I.; Copley, R. R.; Pils, B.; Pinkert, S.; Schultz, J.; Bork, P. SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D257-260
15. Le Borgne, R.; Bardin, A.; Schweisguth, F. The roles of receptor and ligand endocytosis in regulating Notch signaling. Development 2005, 132, 1751-1762.
16. Six, E. M.; Ndiaye, D.; Sauer, G.; Laabi, Y.; Athman, R.; Cumano, A.; Brou, C; Israel, A.; Logeat, F. The notch ligand Deltal recruits Dlgl at cell-cell contacts and regulates cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 55818-55826.
17. LaVoie, M. J.; Selkoe, D. J. The Notch ligands, Jagged and Delta, are sequentially processed by alpha-secretase and presenilin/ gamma-secretase and release signaling fragments. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 34427-34437.
18. Six, E.; Ndiaye, D.; Laabi, Y.; Brou, C; Gupta-Rossi, N.; Israel, A.; Logeat, F. The Notch ligand Deltal is sequentially cleaved by an ADAM protease and gamma-secretase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100, 7638-7643.
19. Ikeuchi, T.; Sisodia, S. S. The Notch ligands, Deltal and Jagged2, are substrates for presenilin-dependent "gamma-secretase" cleavage. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 7751-7754.
20. Hiratochi, M.; Nagase, H.; Kuramochi, Y.; Koh, C. S.; Ohkawara, T.; Nakayama, K. The Delta intracellular domain mediates TGF- beta/Activin signaling through binding to Smads and has an important bi-directional function in the Notch-Delta signaling pathway. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 912-922.
21. Ascano, J. M.; Beverly, L. J.; Capobianco, A. J. The C-terminal PDZ- ligand of JAGGED1 is essential for cellular transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 8771-8779.
22. Sickmeier, M.; Hamilton, J. A.; LeGall, T.; Vacic, V.; Cortese, M. S.; Tantos, A.; Szabo, B.; Tompa, P.; Chen, J.; Uversky, V. N.; Obradovic, Z.; Dunker, A. K. DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, D786-793.
23. Andreeva, A.; Howorth, D.; Chandonia, J. M.; Brenner, S. E.; Hubbard, T. J.; Chothia, C; Murzin, A. G. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007.
24. Linding, R.; Jensen, L. J.; Diella, F.; Bork, P.; Gibson, T. J.; Russell, R. B. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 2003, 11, 1453-1459.
25. Dosztanyi, Z.; Csizmok, V.; Tompa, P.; Simon, I. The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 347, 827-839.
26. Uversky, V. N.; Gillespie, J. R.; Fink, A. L. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions. Proteins 2000, 41, 415-427.
27. Romero, P.; Obradovic, Z.; Li, X.; Garner, E. C; Brown, C. J.; Dunker, A. K. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins 2001, 42, 38-48.
28. Vacic, V.; Uversky, V. N.; Dunker, A. K.; Lonardi, S. Composition Profiler: a tool for discovery and visualization of amino acid composition differences. BMC Bioinf.s 2007, 8, 211.
29. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
30. Vihinen, M.; Torkkila, E.; Riikonen, P. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins 1994, 19, 141-149.
31. Obradovic, Z.; Peng, K.; Vucetic, S.; Radivojac, P.; Brown, C. J.; Dunker, A. K. Predicting intrinsic disorder from amino acid sequence. Proteins 2003, 53, 566-572.
32. Jones, D. T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 292, 195-202.
33. Cuff, J. A.; Barton, G. J. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins 1999, 34, 508-519.
34. Pollastri, G.; Przybylski, D.; Rost, B.; Baldi, P. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 2002, 47, 228-235.
35. Hoover, D. M.; Lubkowski, J. DNAWorks: an automated method for designing oligonucleotides for PCR-based gene synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, e43.
36. Medigue, C; Rouxel, T.; Vigier, P.; Henaut, A.; Danchin, A. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 222, 851-856.
37. Uversky, V. N. Use of fast protein size-exclusion liquid chromatography to study the unfolding of proteins which denature through the molten globule. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 13288-13298.
38. Lobley, A.; Whitmore, L.; Wallace, B. A. DICHROWEB: an interactive website for the analysis of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 211-212.
39. Chen, Y. H.; Yang, J. T.; Chau, K. H. Determination of the helix and beta form of proteins in aqueous solution by circular dichroism. Biochemistry 1974, 13, 3350-3359.
40. Uversky, V. N. What does it mean to be natively unfolded? Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 2-12.
41. Dunker, A. K.; Lawson, J. D.; Brown, C. J.; Williams, R. M.; Romero, P.; Oh, J. S.; Oldfield, C. J.; Campen, A. M.; Ratliff, C. M.; Hipps, K. W.; Ausio, J.; Nissen, M. S.; Reeves, R.; Kang, C; Kissinger, C. R.; Bailey, R. W.; Griswold, M. D.; Chiu, W.; Garner, E. C; Obradovic, Z. Intrinsically disordered protein. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2001, 19, 26-59.
42. Wishart, D. S.; Sykes, B. D.; Richards, F. M. Relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift and protein secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 222, 311-333.
43. Roccatano, D.; Colombo, G.; Fioroni, M.; Mark, A. E. Mechanism by which 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/water mixtures stabilize secondary-structure formation in peptides: a molecular dynamics study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 12179-12184.
44. Wang, Y.; Jardetzky, O. Probability-based protein secondary structure identification using combined NMR chemical-shift data. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 852-861.
45. von Heijne, G. Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residues. Nature 1989, 341, 456-458.
46. Sigalov, A. B.; Aivazian, D. A.; Uversky, V. N.; Stern, L. J. Lipid- binding activity of intrinsically unstructured cytoplasmic domains of multichain immune recognition receptor signaling subunits. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 15731-15739.
47. Pintar, A.; De Biasio, A.; Popovic, M.; Ivanova, N.; Pongor, S. The intracellular region of Notch ligands: does the tail make the difference? Biol. Direct 2007, 2, 19.
48. Popovic, M.: De Biasio, A.; Pintar, A.; Pongor, S. The intracellular region of the Notch ligand Jagged-1 gains partial structure upon binding to synthetic membranes. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 5325-5336.
49. Jelen, F.; Oleksy, A.; Smietana, K.; Otlewski, J. PDZ domains-common players in the cell signaling. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2003, 50, 985-1017.
50. Olivotto, M.; Arcangeli, A.; Carla, M.; Wanke, E. Electric fields at the plasma membrane level: a neglected element in the mechanisms of cell signalling. BioEssays 1996, 18, 495-504.
51. Slavik, J. Intracellular pH topography: determination by a fluorescent probe. FEBS Lett. 1983, 156, 227-230.