How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 628-652

  Curşeu, Petru L ^a   Schalk, René ^a   Wessel, Inge ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Communication technologies; Information exchange; Team working; Virtual work

Indexed keywords

EID: 48749118455     PISSN: 02683946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02683940810894729     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Alavi, M. and Tiwana, A. (2002), “Knowledge integration in virtual teams: the potential role of KMS”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53, pp. 1029-1037.
2. Amabile, T.M. (1983), The Social Psychology of Creativity, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
3. Anderson, J.R. and Lebiere, C. (1998), The Atomic Components of Thought, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
4. Armstrong, D.L. and Cole, P. (1995), “Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups”, in Ed. Jackson, S. and Ed. Ruderman, M. (Eds), Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 497-529.
5. Baltes, B.B., Dickson, M.W., Sherman, M.P., Bauer, C.C. and LaGanke, S.J. (2002), “Computer mediated communication and group decision-making: a meta-analysis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 87, pp. 156-179.
6. Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. (2002), “A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs asynchronous group decision-making”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 34, pp. 457-469.
7. Bouas, K.S. and Arrow, H. (1996), “The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 4, pp. 153-178.
8. Byrne, M.D. (2001), “ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 55, pp. 41-84.
9. Caballer, A., Gracia, F. and Peiró, J.M. (2005), “Affective responses to work processes and outcomes in virtual teams. Effects of communication media and time pressure”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 245-260.
10. Canney Davidson, S. and Ward, K. (1999), Leading International Teams, McGraw Hill International, Maidenhead.
11. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. and Converse, S. (1993), “Shared mental models in expert team decision making”, in Ed. Castellan, N.J. (Ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues, Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 221-246.
12. Carlson, J.R. and George, J.F. (2004), “Media appropriatedness in the conduct and discovery of deceptive communication: the relative influence of richness and synchronicity”, Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 13, pp. 191-210.
13. Cascio, W.F. and Shurygailo, S.E-l.e. (2003), “Leadership and virtual teams”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 31, pp. 362-376.
14. Curşeu, P.L. (2003), Formal Group Decision-making. A Social Cognitive Approach, ASCR Press, Cluj-Napoca.
15. Curşeu, P.L. (2006), “Emergent states in virtual teams. A complex adaptive systems perspective”, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 249-261.
16. Curşeu, P.L. and Schruijer, S.G.L. (n.d.), “The effects of framing on inter-group negotiations” Group Decision and Negotiation (in press).
17. Curşeu, P.L., Schruijer, S.G.L. and Boroş, S. (2007), “The effects of groups' variety and disparity on groups' cognitive complexity”, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 187-206.
18. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1984), “Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organization design”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, pp. 191-233.
19. Dennis, A.R. (1996), “Information exchange and use in group decision making: you can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, December, pp. 433-457.
20. Dennis, A.R., Hilmer, K.M. and Taylor, N.J. (1998), “Information exchange and use in GDSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, pp. 61-88.
21. Dennis, A.R., Wixom, B.H. and Vandenberg, R.J. (2001), “Understanding fit and approximation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, pp. 167-193.
22. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. (1994), “Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory”, Organization Science, Vol. 5, pp. 121-147.
23. Fiol, C.M. and O'Connor, E.J. (2005), “Identification in face-to-face, hybrid and pure virtual teams: untangling the contradictions”, Organization Science, Vol. 16, pp. 19-32.
24. Fjermestad, J. and Hiltz, S.R. (1998), “An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, pp. 7-150.
25. Furst, S.A., Blackburn, R.S. and Rosen, B. (1999), “Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 249-269.
26. Furst, S.A., Reeves, M., Rosen, B. and Blackburn, R.S. (2004), “Managing the life cicle of virtual teams”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 18, pp. 6-20.
27. Garfield, M., Taylor, N., Dennis, A.R. and Satzinger, J.W. (2001), “Research report: modifying paradigms – individual differences, creativity techniques, and exposure to ideas in group idea generation”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 12, pp. 322-333.
28. Goodhue, D. and Thompson, R.L. (1995), “Task technology fit and individual performance”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 213-236.
29. Goodman, P.S., Ravlin, E.C. and Schminke, M. (1990), “Understanding groups in organizations”, in Ed. Cummings, L. and Ed. Staw, B. (Eds), Leadership, Participation, and Group Behavior, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 323-385.
30. Gouran, D.S., Hirokawa, R.Y., Julian, K.M. and Leatham, G.B. (1992), “The evolution and current status of the functional perspective on communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: a critical analysis”, Communication Yearbook, Vol. 16, pp. 573-600.
31. Gibson, C.B. (2001), “From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: cycles of collective cognition in work groups”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22, pp. 121-134.
32. Gillespie, N.A. and Mann, L. (2004), “Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 588-607.
33. Gray, W.D., Young, R.M. and Kirschenbaum, S.S. (1997), “Introduction to this special issue on cognitive architecture and human-computer interaction”, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 12, pp. 301-309.
34. Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D.R. and Hollenbeck, J.R. (1998), “Decision accuracy in computer mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 76, pp. 30-47.
35. Hertel, G., Geister, S. and Konradt, U. (2005), “Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 15, pp. 69-95.
36. Hightower, R. and Sayeed, L. (1996), “Effects of communication mode and prediscussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, pp. 451-465.
37. Hinds, P.J. and Bailey, D.E. (2003), “Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams”, Organization Science, Vol. 14, pp. 615-632.
38. Hinsz, V.B., Tindale, R.S. and Vollrath, D.A. (1997), “The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 121, pp. 43-64.
39. Hirokawa, R.Y. (1988), “Group communication and decision-making performance: a continued test of the functional perspective”, Human Communication Research, Vol. 14, pp. 487-515.
40. Hirokawa, R.Y. (1994), “Functional approaches to the study of group discussion”, Small Group Research, Vol. 25, pp. 524-532.
41. Hollingshead, A.B. (1996), “Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making”, Human Communication Research, Vol. 23, pp. 193-219.
42. Hollingshead, A.B., McGrath, J.E. and O'Connor, K.M. (1993), “Group task performance and communication technology: a longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups”, Small Group Research, Vol. 24, pp. 307-333.
43. Hollingshead, A.B. and McGrath, J.E. (1995), “Computer-assisted groups: a critical review of the empirical research”, in Ed. Guzzo, R.A. and Ed. Salas, E. (Eds), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 46-78.
44. Howes, A. and Young, R.M. (1997), “The role of cognitive architecture in modeling the user: SOAR's learning mechanism”, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 12, pp. 311-343.
45. Hwang, H.G. and Guynes, J. (1994), “The effect of group size on group performance in computer suported decision making”, Information & Management, Vol. 26, pp. 189-198.
46. Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M. and Jundt, D. (2005), “Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 56, pp. 517-543.
47. Jackson, S.E., May, K.E. and Whitney, K. (1995), “Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams”, in Ed. Guzzo, R.A. and Ed. Salas, E. (Eds), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 204-261.
48. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999), “Communication and trust in global virtual teams”, Organization Science, Vol. 10, pp. 791-865.
49. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Shaw, T.R. and Staples, D.S. (2004), “Toward contextualized theories of trust: the role of trust in global virtual teams”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, pp. 250-267.
50. Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. and Neale, M.A. (1999), “Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 741-763.
51. Jehn, K.A. and Mannix, E.A. (2001), “The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 238-251.
52. Kaiser, P., Tullar, W. and McKowen, D. (2000), “Student team project by internet”, Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 63, pp. 75-82.
53. Kanawattanachai, P. and Yoo, Y. (2002), “Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, pp. 187-213.
54. Kayworth, T.R. and Leidner, D.E. (2000), “The global virtual manager: a prescription for success”, European Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 183-194.
55. Kerr, D.S. and Murthy, U.S. (2004), “Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: a comparison of computer mediated and face-to-face communication”, Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 13, pp. 381-399.
56. Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E. and Gibson, C.B. (2004), “The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, pp. 175-192.
57. Kossler, M.E. and Prestridge, S. (1996), “Geographically dispersed teams”, Issues and Observations, Vol. 16, pp. 9-11.
58. Kristof, A.L., Brown, K.G., Sims, H.P. and Smith, K.A. (1995), “The virtual team; a case-study and inductive model”, in Ed. Beyerlein, M.M.,, Ed. Beyerlein, S.T. and Ed. Johnson, D.A. (Eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Knowledge Work in Teams, Vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich CT, pp. 229-253.
59. Liang, D.W., Moreland, R.L. and Argote, L. (1995), “Group versus individual training and group performance: the mediating role of transactive memory”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, pp. 384-393.
60. Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (1997), Virtual Teams. Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
61. Lurey, J.S. and Raisinghani, M.S. (2001), “An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams”, Information and Management, Vol. 38, pp. 523-544.
62. McDonough, E.F. III, Kahn, K.B. and Barczak, G. (2001), “An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and collocated new product development teams”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 18, pp. 110-120.
63. Martins, L.L., Gilson, L.L. and Maynard, M.T. (2004), “Virtual teams: what do we know and where do we go from here?”, Journal of Management, Vol. 30, pp. 805-835.
64. Maruping, L.M. and Agarwal, R. (2004), “Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 975-990.
65. Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, A. (2000), “The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, pp. 273-283.
66. Maznevski, M.L. and Chudoba, K.M. (2000), “Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness”, Organization Science, Vol. 11, pp. 473-492.
67. Medina, F.J., Munduate, L., Dorado, M.A., Martinez, I. and Guera, J.M. (2005), “Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 219-230.
68. Milliken, F.J. and Martins, L.L. (1996), “Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, pp. 402-433.
69. Montoya-Weiss, M., Massey, A. and Song, M. (2001), “Getting it together: temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 1251-1262.
70. Moreland, R.L. (2000), “Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations”, in Ed. Thomson, L., Ed. Messick, D. and Ed. Devine, J. (Eds), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge, Erlbaum, Hilsdale, NJ, pp. 3-31.
71. Moreland, R.L., Argote, L. and Krishnan, R. (1998), “Training people to work in groups”, in Ed. Tindale, R.S., Ed. Heat, L., Ed. Edwards, J., Ed. Posavac, E.J., Ed. Bryant, F.B., Ed. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Ed. Henderson-King, E. and Ed. Myers, J. (Eds), Theory and Research on Small Groups, Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 37-60.
72. Newell, A. (1990), Unified Theories of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
73. Nonaka, I. (1994), “A dynamic of organizational knowledge creation”, Organizational Science, Vol. 5, pp. 14-37.
74. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
75. Nonaka, I., Reinmoller, P. and Senoo, D. (1998), “The ‘ART’ of knowledge: systems to capitalize on market knowledge”, European Management Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 673-684.
76. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N. (2000), “SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 33, pp. 5-34.
77. Nunamaker, J.F. Jr. (1997), “Future research in group support systems: needs, some questions and possible directions”, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 357-385.
78. Nunamaker, J.F. Jr., Briggs, R.O., Mittleman, D.D., Vogel, D.R. and Balthazard, P.A. (1996), “Lessons from dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 163-207.
79. Orlitzky, M. and Hirokawa, R.Y. (2001), “ERR is human, to CORRECT for it divine. A meta-analysis of research testing the functional theory of group decision-making effectiveness”, Small Group Research, Vol. 32, pp. 313-341.
80. Ostrom, T. (1989), “Three catechisms for social memory”, in Ed. Solomon, P., Ed. Goethals, G., Ed. Kelly, C. and Ed. Stepens, B. (Eds), Memory. Interdisciplinary Approaches, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp. 201-220.
81. Parent, M., Gallupe, R.B., Salisbury, W.D. and Handelman, J.M. (2001), “Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help?”, Information & Management, Vol. 38, pp. 47-58.
82. Passos, A.M. and Caetano, A. (2005), “Exploring the effects of intragroup conflict and past performance feedback on team effectiveness”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 231-244.
83. Pissara, J. and Jesuino, J.C. (2005), “Idea generation through computer mediated communication”, The effects of annonimity, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 275-291.
84. Poole, M.S., Holmes, M., Watson, R. and DeSanctis, G. (1993), “Group decision support systems and group communication. A comparison of group decision-making in computer-supported and non-supported groups”, Communication Research, Vol. 20, pp. 176-213.
85. Potter, R.E. and Balthazard, P.A. (2002), “Understanding human interaction and performance in the virtual team”, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 4, pp. 1-23.
86. Rico, R. and Cohen, S.G. (2005), “Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 261-274.
87. Schmidt, J.B., Montoya-Weiss, M.M. and Massey, A.P. (2001), “New product development decision-making effectiveness: comparing individuals, face-to-face teams and virtual teams”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 32, pp. 575-599.
88. Simons, T.L. and Peterson, S.R. (2000), “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, pp. 102-111.
89. Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J. and Kahai, S.S. (1998), “Inspiring group creativity: comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming”, Small Group Research, Vol. 29, pp. 3-31.
90. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986), “Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication”, Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 1492-1512.
91. Stasser, G. (1988), “Computer simulation as a research tool: the DISCUSS model of group decision making”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 393-422.
92. Stasser, G. and Titus, W. (1985), “Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during disscusion”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 1467-1478.
93. Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K., Watson, R.T., Clapper, D.L. and McLean, E.R. (1998), “Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: assessing the impact in an individualistic and collectivistic culture”, Management Science, Vol. 44, pp. 1263-1278.
94. Townsend, A.M., DeMarie, S.M. and Hendrickson, A.R. (1998), “Virtual teams: technology and the workplace of the future”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 12, pp. 17-29.
95. Tuckman, B.W. and Jensen, M.C. (1977), “Stages of small group development revised”, Group and Organizational Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 419-429.
96. Valacich, J.S. and Schwenk, C. (1995), “Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 63, pp. 158-173.
97. Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R. and Nunamaker, J.F. Jr. (1992), “Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation”, Small Group Research, Vol. 23, pp. 49-73.
98. van Gelder, T. (1998), “Cognitive architecture: what choice do we have?”, in Ed. Pylyshyn, Z. (Ed.), Constraining Cognitive Theories: Issues and Options, Ablex, Stamford, CT, pp. 191-204.
99. van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, D. and Homan, A.C. (2004), “Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 1008-1022.
100. Von Cranach, M., Ochsenbein, G. and Valach, L. (1986), “The groups as self-active system: outline of a theory of group action”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 16, pp. 193-229.
101. Warkentin, M.E., Sayeed, L. and Hightower, R. (1997), “Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, pp. 975-996.
102. Wegner, M.D., Erber, R. and Raymond, P. (1991), “Transactive memory in close relationships”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 61, pp. 923-929.
103. Warkentin, M.E. and Beranek, P.M. (1999), “Training to improve virtual team communication”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 271-289.
104. Zigurs, I. (2003), “Leadership in virtual tams: oxymoron or opportunity?”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 31, pp. 339-351.
105. Zigurs, I. and Buckland, B.K. (1998), “A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, pp. 313-333.
106. Benbasat, I. and Lim, L.H. (1993), “The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: a meta-analysis of experimental studies”, Small Group Research, Vol. 24, pp. 430-462.
107. Davis, J.H. (1973), “Group decision and social interaction: a theory of social decision schemes”, Psychological Review, Vol. 80, pp. 97-125.
108. Dennis, A.R., George, J.F., Jessup, L.M., Nunamaker, J.F. Jr. and Vogel, D.R. (1988), “Information technology to support electronic meetings”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, pp. 591-624.
109. Dennis, A.R. and Valacich, J.S. (1993), “Computer brainstorms: more heads are better than one”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, pp. 531-537.
110. Hackman, J.R. (1983), “A normative model of work team effectiveness”, Yale School of Organization and Management, Research Program on Groups Effectiveness, New Haven, CT.
111. Kayworth, T.R. and Leidner, D.E. (2002), “Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, pp. 7-40.
112. Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E. and Zaccaro, S.J. (2001), “A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, pp. 356-376.