A composite microdose Adaptive Response (AR) and Bystander Effect (BE) model - Application to low LET and high LET AR and BE data

International Journal of Radiation Biology

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 681-701

  Leonard, Bobby E ^a  

^a International Academy   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive Response; Bystander Effects; Microdosimetry; Models of cell killing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BYSTANDER EFFECT; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL VOLUME; CHROMOSOME DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER; MICRODOSIMETRY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOBIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALPHA PARTICLES; BYSTANDER EFFECT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; HUMANS; LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; RADON;

EID: 48249151805     PISSN: 09553002     EISSN: 13623095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09553000802241820     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adelstein SJ. 2003. Biological responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Adaptive response versus bystander effect. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 44:125.
2. Attix FH. 1986. Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
3. Azzam SM, DeToledo GP, Raaphorst GP, Mitchell RE. 1996. Low-dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a low level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 Cells. Radiation Research 146:369-373.
4. BEIR VII. 2005. National Research Council of the National Academy of Science. Health effects from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5. Belyaev IY, Czene S, Harms-Ringdahl M. 2001. Changes in chromatin conformation during radiation-induced apoptosis in human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 156:355-364.
6. Bonner WM. 2003. Low-dose radiation: Thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 100:4973-4975.
7. Booz J. 1978. Symposium. Microdosimetry, Commission of the European Communities. EU Report No. 5848.
8. Brenner DJ, Little JB, Sachs RK. 2001. The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis. II. A quantitative model. Radiation Research 155:102-108.
9. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. 2001. The potential impact of bystander effects on radiation risks in a Mars mission. Radiation Research 156:612-617.
10. Brooks AL, Newton GJ, Shyr IJ, Seiler FA, Scott BR. 1990. The combined effects of α-particle and x-rays on cell killing and micronuclei induction in lung epithelial cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 58:799-811.
11. 60Co γ-rays for induction of micronuclei in vitro and in vivo. International Journal of Radiation Biology 66:801-808.
12. Edwards AA, Lloyd DC, Prosser JS. 1989. Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes - a radiobiological review. In: Stather JW, Baverstock KF, editors. Low dose radiation: Biological bases of risk assessment. London, UK: Taylor and Francis. pp 423-432.
13. Elmore E, Lao XY, Ko M, Rightnar S, Redpath JL. 2005. Neoplastic transformation in vitro induced by low doses of 232 MeV protons. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 81:291-297.
14. Elmore E, Lao XY, Kapadia R, Redpath JL. 2006. The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research 166:832-838.
15. Elmore E, Lao XY, Kapadia R, Giedzinski E, Limoli C, Redpath JL. 2008. Low doses of very low-dose-rate low-LET radiation suppress radiation-induced neoplastic transformation In Vitro and induce an adaptive response. Radiation Research 169:311-318.
16. 60 gamma rays and tritium beta particles, Radiation Research 51:229-243.
17. Ennis EG, Ehlers PF. 1993. Notes on random chords in convex bodies. Journal of Applied Probability 30:889-897.
18. Feinendegen LE. 2005. Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. British Journal of Radiology 75:3-7.
19. Feinendegen LE, Bond VP, Sondhaus CA. 2000. The dual response to low-dose irradiation: induction vs. prevention of DNA damage. In: Yamada T et al., editors. Biological effects of low dose radiation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sciences B.V. pp 3-17.
20. Feinendegen LE, Neumann RD, Bond VP, Sondhaus CA. 2002. Absorbed dose and the quantification of physical events at low-dose irradiation in tissue. Military Medicine 167:(Suppl. I):36-38.
21. Feinendegen LE, Neumann RD. 2006. Physics must join with biology in better assessing risk from low-dose irradiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 117:346-356.
22. Feinendegen LE, Polycove M, Neumann RD. 2007. Whole body responses to low-level radiation exposure: New concepts in mammalian radiobiology. Experimental Hemotology 35:37-46.
23. Feinendegen LE, Paretzke H, Neumann RD. 2008. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation. Radiation Research 169:247.
24. Goodhead DT. 2006. Energy deposition stochastics and track structure: What about the target? Radiation Protection Dosimetry 122:3-15.
25. Huang L, Kim PM, Nickoloff JA, Morgan WF. 2007. Targeted and nontargeted effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on delayed genomic instability in human cells. Cancer Research 67:1099-1104.
26. Hall EJ. 2000. Radiobiology for the radiologist. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
27. Heyes GJ, Mill AJ. 2004. The neoplastic transformation potential of mammography X rays and atomic bomb spectrum radiation. Radiation Research 162:120-127.
28. Heyes GJ, Mill AJ, Charles MW. 2006. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. British Journal of Radiology 79:195-200.
29. Hooker AM, Bhat M, Day TK, Lane JM, Swinburne SJ, Morley AA, Sykes PJ. 2004. The linear no-threshold model does not hold for low-dose ionizing radiation. Radiation Research 162:447-452.
30. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2001. Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment, Technical Series No. 405. Vienna, Austria.
31. International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP). 2004. ICRP Draft report of committee I/Task group. Low dose extrapolation of radiation related cancer risk. London, UK.
32. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). 1983. Microdosimetry ICRU Report 36, Bethesda, Maryland.
33. Iyer R, Lehnert BE. 2002. Alpha-particle-induced increases in the radioresistance of normal human bystander cells. Radiation Research 157:3-7.
34. Jostes RF, Hul TE, James AC, Cross FT, Schwartz JI, Rotmensch J, Archer RW, Evans HH, Menci J, Bakale G, Rad PS. 1991. In vitro exposure of mammalian cells to radon: Dosimetric considerations. Radiation Research 127:211-219.
35. Kellerer AM. 1984. Chord-length distributions and related quantities for spheroids. Radiation Research 98:425-437.
36. Kellerer AM, Rossi HH. 1972. The theory of dual radiation action. In: Ebert M, Howard A, editors. Current topics in radiation research quarterly. Index Medicus, Vol. 8. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishers. pp 85-158.
37. Ko SJ, Liao X-Y, Molloi S, Elmore E, Redpath JL. 2004. Neoplastic transformation in vitro after exposure to low doses of mammographic-energy X rays: Qualitative and mechanistic aspects. Radiation Research 162:646-654.
38. Lee R, Nasonova E, Ritter S. 2005. Chromosomse aberrations yields and apoptosis in human lymphocytes irradiated with Feions of differing LET. Advances in Space Research 35:268-275.
39. Leonard BE. 2005. Adaptive response by single cell radiation hits - implications for nuclear workers. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 116:387-391.
40. Leonard BE. 2007a. Adaptive response and human risks: Part I. A microdosimetry dose dependent model. International Journal of Radiation Biology 83:115-131.
41. Leonard BE. 2007b. Adaptive response: Part II. Modeling for dose rate and time influences. International Journal of Radiation Biology 83:395-408.
42. Leonard BE. 2008a. Common sense about the Linear No-Threshold controversy - Give the general public a break. Radiation Research 169:245.
43. Leonard BE. 2008b. Mammogram X-rays - conclusive evidence of protective bystander, adaptive response radio-protection and AR retention at high dose levels. International Journal of Radiation Biology, In Review.
44. Lloyd DC, Edwards AA, Leonard A, Deknudt GL, Natajan AT, Obe G, Palitti F, Tanzarella C, Tawn EJ. 1988. Frequencies of chromosomal aberrations induced in human blood lymphocytes by low doses of X-rays. International Journal of Radiation Biology 53:49-55.
45. Little MP. 2004. The bystander effect model of Brenner and Sachs fitted to lung cancer data in 11 cohorts of underground miners, and equivalence of fit of a linear relative risk model with adjustment for attained age and age at exposure. Journal of Radiological Protection 24:243-255.
46. Little MP, Wakeford R. 2001. The bystander effect in C3H 10T1/2 cells and radon induced lung cancer. Radiation Research 156:695-699.
47. Miller RC, Randers-Pehrson G, Geard CR, Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. 1999. The oncogenic transforming potential of the passage of single α particles through mammalian cell nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 96:19-22.
48. Morgan WF. 2003a. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro. Radiation Research 159:567-580.
49. Morgan WF. 2003b. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiation Research 159:581-596.
50. Morgan WF. 2006. Will radiation-induced bystander effects or adaptive responses impact on the shape of the dose response relationships at low doses of ionizing radiation? Dose-Response 4:257-262.
51. Mossman KL. 2008. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate. Radiation Research 169:245.
52. Mothersill C, Seymour CB. 1997. Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 71:421-427.
53. Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2005. Radiation-induced bystander effects: Are they good, bad or both? Medicine, Conflict and Survival 21:101-110.
54. Nagasawa H, Little JB. 1999. Unexpected sensitivity to the induction of mutations by very low doses of alpha-particle radiation: Evidence of a bystander effect. Radiation Research 152:552-557.
55. Pohl-Rüling J, Fischer P. 1979. The dose-effect relationship of chromosome aberrations to α and γ irradiation in a population subjected to an increased burden of natural radioactivity. Radiation Research 80:61-81.
56. Pohl-Rüling J, Fischer P, Haas O, Obe G, Natarajan AT, Van Buul PPW, Buckton KE, Bianchi NO, Larramendy M, Kucherova M, Polikova Z, Leonard A, Fabry L, Palitti F, Sharma T, Binder W, Muhkerjee RN, Mikherjee U. 1983. Effect of low-dose acute x-irradiation on the frequencies of chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro. Mutation Research 110:71-82.
57. Pohl-Rüling J. 1988. Chromosome aberrations in man in areas with elevated natural radioactivity. In: Bezelius Symposium XV:103-111.
58. Pohl-Rüling J, Pohl S. 1990. Method for α-irradiation of blood cultures with short-lived radon-222 decay products. Mutation Research 234:43-45.
59. Pohl-Rüling J, Lettner H, Hofmann W, Eckl P, Haas OA, Obe G, Grell-Buchtmann I, Van Buul PP W, Schroeder-Kurth T, Atzmuller CH, Sasaki MS, Fischer P, Kublak R, Natarajan AT. 2000. Chromosome aberrations of blood lymphocytes induced in vitro by radon-222 daughter α-irradiation. Mutation Research 449:7-19.
60. Polycove M, Feinendegen LE. 2003. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: Possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage. Human & Experimental Toxiciology 22:290-306.
61. Portess DJ, Bauer G, Hill MA, O'Neill. 2007. Low-dose irradiation of non-transformed cells stimulates the selective removal of precancerous cells via intercellular induction of apoptosis. Cancer Research 67:1246-1253.
62. Purrot RJ, Edwards AA, Lloyd DC, Stather JW. 1980. The induction of chromosome aberrations by in vitro α-particles from plutonium-239. International Journal of Radiation Biology 80:277-284.
63. Randers-Pehrson G, Geard CR, Johnson G, Ellison CD, Brenner DJ. 2001. The Columbia University single-ion microbeam. Radiation Research 156:210-214.
64. Redpath JL, Liang D, Taylor TH, Cristie C, Elmore E. 2001. The shape of thedose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: Evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research 156:700-707.
65. Redpath JL, Lu Q, Lao X-Y, Molloi S, Elmore E. 2003. Low doses of diagnostic X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro. International Journal of Radiation Biology 79:235-240.
66. Redpath JL, Mitchel REJ. 2006. Letter to Editor: Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. British Journal of Radiology 79:854-855.
67. Redpath JL. 2007. Health risks of low photon energy imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 122:528-533.
68. Sawant SG, Randers-Pehrson G, Metting NF, Hall EJ. 2001. Adaptive response and bystander effect induced by radiation in C3 10T1/2 cells in culture. Radiation Research 156:177-180.
69. Schmid E, Hieber L, Heinzmann U, Roos H, Kellerer AM. 1996. Analysis of chromosome aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes induced by α-particle irradiation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 35:179-184.
70. Schollnberger H, Eckl PM. 2007. Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector odel. Dose-Response Journal 5:187-203.
71. Schollnberger H, Mitchel REJ, Redpath JL, Crawford-Brown DJ, Hofmann W. 2007. Detrimental and protective bystander effects: A model approach. Radiation Research 168:614-626.
72. Shadley JD, Afzal V, Wolff S. 1987. Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of x-rays to human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 111:511-517.
73. Shadley JK, Wiencke JK. 1989. Induction of the adaptive response by X-rays is dependent on radiation intensity. International Journal of Radiation Biology 56:107-118.
74. Shao C, Folfard M, Michael BD, Prise KM. 2004. Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 101:13495-13500.
75. Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Bonnin A, Le Guen B, Masse R, Monier R, Valleron AJ, de Vathaire F. 2005. Dose-effect relationships and the estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation. Joint Report no. 2, Academie National de Medicine, Institute de France - Academie des Sciences. Paris, France.
76. Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Masse R. 2006. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses. Journal of Radiation Protection 26:317-324.
77. Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Masse R. 2008. Low-dose risk assessment: The debate continues. Radiation Research 169:246.
78. Wiencke JK, Afzal V, Oliveri G, Wolff S. 1986. Evidence that [3H] thymidine-induced adaptive response of human lymphocytes to subsequent doses of x-rays involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Mutagenesis 1:375-380.
79. Zhou H, Randers-Pherson G, Geard CR, Brenner DJ, Hall EJ, Hei T. 2003. Interaction between radiation-induced adaptive response and bystander mutagenesis in mammalian cells. Radiation Research 160:512-516.