GSRT-Soft: A generic software application and some methodological guidelines to investigate implicit learning through visual-motor sequential tasks

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 493-502

  Chambaron, Stéphanie ^a   Ginhac, Dominique ^a   Perruchet, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SERIAL LEARNING; SOFTWARE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 48149093499     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.2.493     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BERRY, D. C., & BROADBENT, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 209-231.
2. BISCHOFF-GRETHE, A., GOEDERT, K. M., WILLINGHAM, D. T., & GRAFTON, S. T. (2004). Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 127-138.
3. CHAMBARON, S., GINHAC, D., & PERRUCHET, P. (2006). Is learning in SRT tasks robust across procedural variations? In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 148-153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. CLEEREMANS, A. (1993). Attention and awareness in sequence learning. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 330-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. CLEEREMANS, A. (1995). Implicit learning in the presence of multiple cues. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 298-303). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. CLEEREMANS, A., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
7. COHEN, A., IVRY, R. I., & KEELE, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 17-30.
8. CURRAN, T. (1997). Effects of aging on implicit sequence learning: Accounting for sequence structure and explicit knowledge. Psychological Research, 60, 24-41.
9. CURRAN, T., & KEELE, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 189-202.
10. DEROOST, N., & SOETENS, E. (2006). Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 16-30.
11. DESTREBECQZ, A., & CLEEREMANS, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343-350.
12. DESTREBECQZ, A., & CLEEREMANS, A. (2003). Temporal effects in sequence learning. In L. Jimenez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 181-213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. FRENSCH, P. A., BUCHNER, A., & LIN, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 567-584.
14. GOSCHKE, T., & BOLTE, A. (2007). Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: Response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 394-406.
15. HEYES, C. M., & FOSTER, C. L. (2002). Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 593-607.
16. HOWARD, D. V., & HOWARD, J. H., JR. (1989). Age differences in learning serial patterns: Direct versus indirect measures. Psychology & Aging, 4, 357-364.
17. HOWARD, J. H., JR., & HOWARD, D. V. (1997). Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. Psychology & Aging, 12, 634-656.
18. HUNT, R. H., & ASLIN, R. N. (2001). Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: Access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 658-680.
19. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
20. JIMÉNEZ, L., MÉNDEZ, C., & CLEEREMANS, A. (1996). Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 948-969.
21. KOTCHOUBEY, B., HAISST, S., DAUM, I., SCHUGENS, M., & BIRBAUMER, N. (2000). Learning and self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 15-35.
22. MCDOWALL, J., & MARTIN, S. (1996). Implicit learning in closed head injured subjects: Evidence from an event sequence learning task. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 25, 1-6.
23. MEULEMANS, T., VAN DER LINDEN, M., & PERRUCHET, P. (1998). Implicit sequence learning in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 199-221.
24. MYORS, B. (1999). Timing accuracy of PC programs running under DOS and Windows. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 322-328.
25. NISSEN, M. J., & BULLEMER, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
26. NORMAN, E., PRICE, M. C., DUFF, S. C., & MENTZONI, R. A. (2007). Gradations of awareness in a modified sequence learning task. Consciousness & Cognition, 16, 809-837.
27. OSMAN, M., BIRD, G., & HEYES, C. (2005). Action observation supports effector-dependent learning of finger movement sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 19-27.
28. PERRUCHET, P., & AMORIM, M.-A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 785-800.
29. PERRUCHET, P., BIGAND, E., & BENOIT- GONIN, F. (1997). The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time tasks. Psychological Research, 60, 4-13.
30. PERRUCHET, P., & PACTON, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233-238.
31. REBER, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 855-863.
32. REED, J., & JOHNSON, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 585-594.
33. SALTHOUSE, T. A., MCGUTHRY, K. E., & HAMBRICK, D. Z. (1999). A framework for analyzing and interpreting differential aging patterns: Application to three measures of implicit learning. Aging, Neuropsychology. & Cognition, 6, 1-18.
34. SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & GOMEZ, R. L. (1998). Attention and probabilistic sequence learning. Psychological Research, 61, 175-190.
35. SHANKS, D. R. (2003). Attention and awareness in "implicit" sequence learning. In L. Jimenez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 11-42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. SHANKS, D. R. (2005). Implicit learning. In K. Lamberts & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of cognition (pp. 202-220). London: Sage.
37. SHANKS, D. R., CHANNON, S., WILKINSON, L., & CURRAN, H. V. (2006). Disruption of sequential priming in organic and pharmacological amnesia: A role for the medial temporal lobes in implicit contextual learning. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 1768-1776.
38. SHANKS, D. R., & JOHNSTONE, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1435-1451.
39. SHANKS, D. R., & ST. JOHN, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
40. SHANKS, D. R., WILKINSON, L., & CHANNON, S. (2003). Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 248-261.
41. SMITH, J., SIEGERT, R. J., MCDOWALL, J., & ABERNETHY, D. (2001). Preserved implicit learning on both the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar in patients with Parkinson's disease. Brain & Cognition, 45, 378-391.
42. STEVENS, A., SCHWARZ, J., SCHWARZ, B., RUF, I., KOLTER, T., & CZEKALLA, J. (2002). Implicit and explicit learning in schizophrenics treated with olanzapine and with classic neuroleptics. Psychopharmacology, 160, 299-306.
43. STÖCKER, C., SEBALD, A., & HOFFMANN, J. (2003). The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 685-703.
44. VINTER, A., & PERRUCHET, P. (2000). Implicit learning in children is not related to age: Evidence from drawing behavior. Child Development, 71, 1223-1240.
45. WILKINSON, L., & SHANKS, D. R. (2004). Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 354-369.
46. WILLINGHAM, D. B., NISSEN, M. J., & BULLEMER, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &. Cognition, 15, 1047-1060.
47. ZIESSLER, M., & NATTKEMPER, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 595-613.
48. ZILLMER, E. A., & SPIERS, M. V. (2001). Principles of neuropsychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.