Longitudinal predictors of word reading development

Canadian Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 103-110

  Kirby, John R ^a   Roth, Leah ^a   Desrochers, Alain ^b   Lai, Sandy S V ^c  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Morphological awareness; Naming speed; Orthographic processing; Phonological awareness; Reading development

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949119986     PISSN: 07085591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.103     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Anthony, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43-55.
3. Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 229-251.
4. Badian, N. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 179-202.
5. Barker, T. A., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 334-345.
6. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
7. Biemiller, A. (2007). The influence of vocabulary instruction on reading. In the Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development. Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network, http://www.literacyencyclopedia.ca/.
8. Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 44-62.
9. Bowers, P. G., & Newby-Clark, E. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 109-126.
10. Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Morpho-phonological word structure: Can instruction add transparency to opaque words? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Vancouver, BC.
11. Bowey, J. A., Storey, T., & Ferguson, A. N. (2004). The association between continuous naming speed and word reading skill in fourth- to sixth-grade children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 155-163.
12. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
13. Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Bindman, M. (1998). Awareness of language in children who have reading difficulties: Historical comparisons in a longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 501-510.
14. Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403-414.
15. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Erlbaum, Publishers: Hillsdale, NJ.
16. Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies in Reading, 7, 239-254.
17. Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effect of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249-274.
18. Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291-332.
19. Castles, A. (2006). The dual route model and the developmental dyslexias. London Review of Education, 4, 49-61.
20. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149-180.
21. Colasante, C., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2006). Remediating naming speed and phonological deficits in reading disabled children: An evaluation of two intervention programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network, Charlottetown, PEI.
22. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
23. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 549-568.
24. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733-740.
25. Deacon, S. D., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2007). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexies and poor readers: A strength or weakness? In F. Manis, A. Fawcett, G. Reid, & L. Siegel (Eds.), Dyslexia handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological: Is it more than phonological? Evaluating the roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223-238.
27. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid "automatized" naming (R. A. N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471-479.
28. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.
29. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
30. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, East Sussex, United Kingdom: Erlbaum.
31. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
32. Johnston, T. C., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339-361.
33. Kail, R., Hall, L. K., & Caskey, B. J. (1999). Processing speed, exposure to print, and naming speed. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 303-314.
34. Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R., & Pfeiffer, S. (2003). Naming speed and phonological processing as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453-464.
35. Lemoine, H. E., Levy, B. A., & Hutchinson, A. (1993). Increasing the naming speed of poor reader: Representations formed across repetitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 297-328.
36. Levy, B. A., Bourassa, D. C., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 115-138.
37. Levy, B. A., Gong, Z., Hessels, S., Evans, M. A., & Jared, D. (2006). Understanding print: Early reading development and the contributions of home literacy experiences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 63-93.
38. MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1992). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Nelson.
39. Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325-333.
40. McBride-Chang, C., & Manis, F. R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 323-339.
41. McDougall, P., Borowsky, R., MacKinnon, G. E., & Hymel, S. (2005). Process dissociation of sight vocabulary and phonetic decoding in reading: A new perspective on surface and phonological dyslexias. Brain and Language, 92, 185-203.
42. Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134-147.
43. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
44. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (Eds.) (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge.
45. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 289-307.
46. Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243-278). Baltimore: Brookes
47. Plaut, D. C. (2005). Connectionist approaches to reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 24-38). Oxford: Blackwell publishing.
48. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277-282.
49. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482-503.
50. Rey, A., Ziegler, J., & Jacobs, A. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1-B12.
51. Roman, A. R., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R., Wade-Woolley, L. & Deacon, S. D. (in press). Towards a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
52. Roth, L., Lai, S., White, B., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Orthographic and morphological processing as predictors of reading achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Vancouver, BC.
53. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
54. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
55. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
56. Sunseth, K., & Bowers, P. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling, and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 401-429.
57. Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407-440.
58. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
59. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processes (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
60. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
61. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
62. Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
63. Wolf, M., O'Rourke, A. G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43-72.
64. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised (WRMT-R): Forms G & H. USA: American Guidance Service.