Process dissociation of sight vocabulary and phonetic decoding in reading: A new perspective on surface and phonological dyslexias

Brain and Language

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 185-203

  McDougall, Patricia ^a   Borowsky, Ron ^b   MacKinnon, G E ^c   Hymel, Shelley ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ASSOCIATION; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DYSLEXIA; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; READING; REVIEW; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 11144250908     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Baddeley A.D., Ellis N.C., Miles T.C., Lewis V.J. Developmental and acquired dyslexia: a comparison. Cognition. 11:1982;185-199
2. Baluch B., Besner D. Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 17:1991;644-652
3. Besner D., Smith M.C. Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18:1992;468-482
4. Borowsky R., Besner D. Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 17:1991;272-276
5. Borowsky R., Besner D. Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 19:1993;813-840
6. Borowsky R., Besner D. Lexical access codes in visual word recognition: Are the joint effects of context and stimulus quality diagnostic? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 54:2000;196-207
7. Borowsky R., Masson M.E.J. Frequency effects and lexical access: On the interpretation of null pseudohomophone base-word frequency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;270-275
8. Borowsky R., Masson M.E.J. Semantic ambiguity effects in word-identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 22:1996;63-85
9. Borowsky, R., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1997). Computerized versus manual methods of measuring reading performance: Implications for studying basic reading processes outside the laboratory. Paper presented at 7th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
10. Borowsky R., Owen W.J., Fonos N. Reading speech and hearing print: Constraining models of visual word recognition by exploring connections with speech perception. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 53:1999;294-305
11. Borowsky R., Owen W.J., Masson M.E.J. Diagnostics of phonological lexical processing: Pseudohomophone advantages, disadvantages, and baseword frequency effects. Memory & Cognition. 30:2002;969-987
12. Bryant P., Impey L. The similarity between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition. 24:1986;121-137
13. Castles A., Coltheart M. Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition. 47:1993;149-180
14. Coltheart M. Varieties of developmental dyslexia: a comment on Bryant and Impey. Cognition. 27:1987;97-101
15. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M. Models of reading: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review. 100:1993;589-608
16. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J.C. DRC: A computational model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review. 108:2001;204-256
17. Doctor E.A., Coltheart M. Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition. 8:1980;195-209
18. Goswami U., Ziegler J.C., Dalton L., Schneider W. Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language. 45:2001;648-664
19. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review. 106:1999;491-528
20. Hendricks A.W., Kolk H.H.J. Strategic control in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 14:1997;321-366
21. Hillstrom A.P., Logan G.D. Process dissociation, cognitive architecture, and response time: Comments on Lindsay and Jacoby (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1997;219-234
22. Jacobs A.M., Rey A., Ziegler J.C., Grainger J. MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Localist connection approaches to human cognition. 1998;147-188 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
23. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;513-541
24. Jacoby L.L., McElree B., Trainham T.N. Automatic influences as accessibility bias in memory and Stroop tasks: Towards a formal model. Gopher D., Koriat A., et al. Attention and performance XVII. 1999;461-486 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Jackson N.E., Butterfield E.C. Reading-level-match designs: Myths and realities. Journal of Reading Behavior. 21:1989;387-412
26. Jastak S., Wilkinson G.S. The wide range achievement test-revised. 1984;Jastak Associates, Wilmington, DE
27. Joordens S., Merikle P.M. Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122:1993;462-467
28. Laxon V., Smith B., Masterson J. Children's nonword reading: Pseudohomophones, neighborhood size, and priming effects. Reading Research Quarterly. 30:1995;126-144
29. Lindsay D.S., Jacoby L.L. Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;219-234
30. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin. 109:1991;163-203
31. Manis F.R., Seidenberg M.S., Doi L.M., McBride-Chang C., Peterson A. On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition. 58:1996;157-195
32. Manis F.R., Szeszulski P.A., Holt L.K., Graves K. Variation in component word recognition and spelling skills among dyslexic children and normal readers. Carr T.H., Levy B.A. Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. 1990;Academic Press, San Diego, CA
33. Marmurek H.H.C., Kwantes P.J. Reading words and wirds: Phonology and lexical access. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 49A:1996;696-714
34. Masson M.E.J., Borowsky R. More than meets the eye: Context effects on word identification. Memory and Cognition. 26:1998;1245-1269
35. Merikle, P. M., & Cheesman, J. (1987). Current status of research on subliminal perception. In: M. Wallendorf & P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research XIV, Association for Consumer Research: Provo, UT
36. Monsell S., Patterson K.E., Graham A., Hughes C.H., Milroy R. Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18:1992;452-467
37. Olson R.K., Kliegl R., Davidson B., Foltz G. Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. MacKinnon G.E., Waller T.G. Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. 1985;Academic Press, San Diego, CA
38. Owen W.J., Borowsky R. Examining the interactivity of lexical orthographic and phonological processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 57:2004;290-303
39. Owen, W. J., & Borowsky, R. (2004b). Evaluating the relationship between phonetic decoding and sight vocabulary: Evidence for single or dual routes? Manuscript submitted for publication
40. Owen, W. J., & Borowsky, R., Sarty, G. E. (2002). Images of the Word Frequency Effect. 20th Banff Annual Seminar in Cognitive Science, May, Banff, AB
41. Paap K.R., McDonald J.E., Schvaneveldt R.W., Noel R.W. Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. Coltheart M. Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. 1987;221-243 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
42. Simos P.G., Breier J.I., Fletcher J.M., Foorman B.R., Castillo E.M., Papanicolaou A.C. Brain mechanisms for reading words and pseudowords: an integrated approach. Cerebral Cortex. 12:2002;297-305
43. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K.E. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115
44. Posner M.I., Raichle M.E. Images of mind. 1994;Scientific American Library, New York
45. Pugh K.R., Mencl W.E., Jenner A.R., Katz L., Frost S.J., Lee J.R., Shaywitz S.E., Shaywitz B.A. Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 6:2000;207-213
46. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review. 104:1997;319-343
47. Snowling, M. J., Bryant, P. E., & Hulme, C. (1996). Theoretical and methodological pitfalls in making comparisons between developmental and acquired dyslexia: Some comments on A. Castles & M. Coltheart (1993). Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 443-451
48. Spieler D.H., Balota D.A., Faust M.E. Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults an in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;461-479
49. Stanovich K.E. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly. 16:1980;32-71
50. Stanovich K.E., Nathan R.G., Vala-Rossi M. Developmental changes in the cognitive correlates of reading ability and the developmental lag hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly. 21:1986;267-283
51. Stanovich K.E., Siegel L.S. Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology. 86:1994;24-53
52. Stanovich K.E., Siegel L.S., Gottardo A. Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology. 89:1997;114-127
53. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18:1935;643-661
54. Trainham T.N., Lindsay D.S., Jacoby L.L. Stroop process dissociations: Reply to Hillstrom and Logan (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:1997;1579-1587
55. West R.F., Stanovich K.E. How much of sentence priming is word priming. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 26:1988;1-4
56. Woodcock R.W. Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. 1987;American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN
57. Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Touchstone Applied Science Associates
58. Zorzi M., Houghton G., Butterworth B. Two routes or one in reading aloud. A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24:1998;1131-1161