Response mode differences in perspective taking: Differences in representation or differences in retrieval?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 863-872

  Kelly, Jonathan W ^a   McNamara, Timothy P ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGINATION; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SPATIAL MEMORY; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 46449134902     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.4.863     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AVRAAMIDES, M. N., IOANNIDOU, L. M., & KYRANIDOU, M. N. (2007). Locating targets from imagined perspectives: Comparing labeling with pointing responses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1660-1679.
2. AVRAAMIDES, M. N., KLATZKY, R. L., LOOMIS, J. M., & GOLLEDGE, R. G. (2004). Use of cognitive vs. perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on response mode. Psychological Science, 15, 403-408.
3. DE VEGA, M., & RODRIGO, M. J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labelling under physical and imaginary rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 369-393.
4. DIWADKAR, V. A., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
5. EASTON, R. D., & SHOLL, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 483-500.
6. KELLY, J. W., AVRAAMIDES, M. N., & LOOMIS, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 1092-1107.
7. KELLY, J. W., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (2008). Spatial memories of virtual environments: How egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 322-327.
8. KLATZKY, R. L., LOOMIS, J. M., BEALL, A. C., CHANCE, S. S., & GOLLEDGE, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293-298.
9. MAY, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 163-206.
10. MCNAMARA, T. P., RUMP, B., & WERNER, S. (2003). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 589-595.
11. MOU, W., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162-170.
12. MOU, W., MCNAMARA, T. P., VALIQUETTE, C. M., & RUMP, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 142-157.
13. PHILBECK, J. W., LOOMIS, J. M., & BEALL, A. C. (1997). Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 601-612.
14. PRESSON, C. C., & MONTELLO, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447-1455.
15. RIESER, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
16. ROSKOS-EWOLDSEN, B., MCNAMARA, T. P., SHELTON, A. L., & CARR, W. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 215-226.
17. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
18. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274-310.
19. WALLER, D., MONTELLO, D. R., RICHARDSON, A. E., & HEGARTY, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1051-1063.
20. WANG, R. F. (2004). Action, verbal response, and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 94, 185-192.
21. WERNER, S., & SCHMIDT, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 1, 447-473.
22. WRAGA, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: An advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 993-1005.