Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 601-612

  Philbeck, John W ^a   Loomis, Jack M ^a   Beall, Andrew C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEFENSE MECHANISM; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

ADULT; DEFENSE MECHANISMS; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

EID: 0031135479     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211868     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AMORIM, M.-A., GLASALIER, S., CORPINOT, K., & BERTHOZ, A. (1997). Updating an object's orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: A comparison between two processing modes. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 404-418.
2. ASHMEAD, D. H., DAVIS, D. L., & NORTHINGTON, A. (1995). Contribution of listeners' approaching motion to auditory distance perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 239-256.
3. BAIRD, J. C. (1970). Psychophysical analysis of visual space. Oxford: Pergamon.
4. BEALL, A. C., & LOOMIS, J. M. (1996). Visual control of steering without course information. Perception, 25, 481-494.
5. BEALL, A. C., LOOMIS, J. M., PHILBECK, J. W., & FIKES, T. G. (1995). Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display (pp. 288-297). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
6. BÖÖK, A., & GÄRLING, T. (1981). Maintenance of orientation during locomotion in unfamiliar environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 995-1006.
7. BRUNSWIK, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. CALVERT, E. S. (1954). Visual judgments in motion. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 7, 233-251.
9. CAMPBELL, D. T. (1966). Pattern matching as an essential in distal knowing. In K. R. Hammond (Ed.), The psychology of Egon Brunswik (pp. 81-106). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. COLLETT, T. S. (1982). Do toads plan routes? A study of the detour behavior of Bufo viridis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 146, 261-271.
11. CORLETT, J. T. (1992). The role of vision in the planning and guidance of locomotion through the environment. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 375-396). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. CUTTING, J. E., & VISHTON, P. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 5. Perception of space and motion (2nd ed., pp. 69-117). San Diego: Academic Press.
13. EBY, D. W., & LOOMIS, J. M. (1987). A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 308-312.
14. ELLIOTT, D. (1986). Continuous visual information may be important after all: A failure to replicate Thomson (1983). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 388-391.
15. ELLIOTT, D. (1987). The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 476-485.
16. FOLEY, J. M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception, 6, 449-460.
17. FOLEY, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87, 411-434.
18. FUJITA, N., KLATZKY, R. L., LOOMIS, J. M., & GOLLEDGE, R. G. (1993). The encoding-error model of pathway completion without vision. Geographical Analysis, 25, 295-314.
19. FUKUSIMA, S. S., LOOMIS, J. M., & DA SILVA, J. A. (1997). Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 86-100.
20. GIBSON, J. J. (1958). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 182-194.
21. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
22. GLASAUER, S., AMORIM, M.-A., VITTE, E., & BERTHOZ, A. (1994). Goal-directed linear locomotion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 323-335.
23. GOGEL, W. C. (1984). The role of perceptual interrelations in figural synthesis. In P. Dodwell & T. Caelli (Eds.), Figurai synthesis (pp. 31-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. GOGEL, W. C. (1990). A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 105-123.
25. GOGEL, W. C. (1993). The analysis of perceived space. In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory (pp. 113-182). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
26. GOGEL, W. C., LOOMIS, J. M., NEWMAN, N. J., & SHARKEY, T. J. (1985). Agreement between indirect measures of perceived distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 17-27.
27. GOGEL, W. C., & TIETZ, J. D. (1973). Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 284-292.
28. GOGEL, W. C., & TIETZ, J. D. (1979). A comparison of oculomotor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance. Vision Research, 19, 1161-1170.
29. HILL, D. E. (1979). Orientation by jumping spiders of the genus Phidippus (Araneae: Salticidae) during the pursuit of prey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 5, 301-322.
30. LAURENT, M., & CAVALLO, V. (1985). Role des modalités de prise d'informations visuelles dans un pointage locomoteur [The role of visual input modality in a locomotor pointing task]. L'Année Psychologique, 85, 41-48.
31. LEE, D. N. (1980). Visuo-motor coordination in space-time. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 281-295). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
32. LOOMIS, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 113-119.
33. LOOMIS, J. M., DA SILVA, J. A., FUJITA, N., & FUKUSIMA, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 906-921.
34. LOOMIS, J. M., DA SILVA, J. A., PHILBECK, J. W., & FUKUSIMA, S. S. (1996). Visual perception of location and distance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 72-77.
35. LOOMIS, J. M., HEBERT, C., & CICINELLI, J. G. (1990). Active localization of virtual sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1757-1764.
36. LOOMIS, J. M., KLATZKY, R. L., GOLLEDGE, R. G., CICINELLI, J. G., PELLEGRINO, J. W., & FRY, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73-91.
37. LOOMIS, J. M., KLATZKY, R. L., PHILBECK, J. W., & GOLLEDGE, R. G. (1997). Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Manuscript submitted for publication.
38. MCBEATH, M. K., SHAFFER, D. M., & KAISER, M. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268, 569-573.
39. NORMAN, J. F., TODD, J. T., PEROTTI, V. J., & TITTLE, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 173-186.
40. PHILBECK, J. W., & LOOMIS, J. M. (1997). A comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 72-85.
41. RIESER, J. J., ASHMEAD, D. H., TALOR, C. R., & YOUNGQUIST, G. A. (1990). Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception, 19, 675-689.
42. RIESER, J. J., GUTH, D. A., & HILL, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15, 173-188.
43. RIESER, J. J., PICK, H. L., JR., ASHMEAD, D. H., & GARING, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 480-497.
44. RIESER, J. J., & RIDER, E. A. (1991). Young children's spatial orientation with respect to multiple targets when walking without vision. Developmental Psychology, 27, 97-107.
45. ROYDEN, C. S., CROWELL, J. A., & BANKS, M. S. (1994). Estimating heading during eye movements. Vision Research, 34, 3197-3214.
46. SPEIGLE, J. M., & LOOMIS, J. M. (1993). Auditory distance perception by translating observers. In Proceedings of IEEE 1993 Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality (pp. 92-99). Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society.
47. STEENHUIS, R. E., & GOODALE, M. A. (1988). The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: Does an accurate short-term memory for spatial location exist? Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 399-415.
48. THOMSON, J. A. (1980). How do we use visual information to control locomotion? Trends in Neurosciences, 3, 247-250.
49. THOMSON, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 427-443.
50. TURVEY, M. T., & CARELLO, C. (1986). The ecological approach to perceiving-acting: A pictorial essay. Acta Psychologica, 63, 133-155.
51. WARREN W. H. (1990). The perception-action coupling. In H. Bloch & B. I. Bertenthal (Eds.), Sensory-motor organizations and development in infancy and early childhood (NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, D: Behavioural and Social Sciences, Vol. 56, pp. 23-37). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
52. WARREN, W. H., & HANNON, D. J. (1990). Eye movements and optical flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 160-169.
53. YILMAZ, E. H., & WARREN, W. H. (1995). Visual control of braking: A test of the tau hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 996-1014.