Spatial memories of virtual environments: How egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 322-327

  Kelly, Jonathan W ^a   McNamara, Timothy P ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; SELF CONCEPT;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; SELF CONCEPT; SPACE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 46449118947     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.322     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. AVRAAMIDES, M. N., & KELLY, J. W. (2005). Imagined perspective-changing within and across novel environments. In C. Freksa, B. Nebel, M. Knauff, & B. Krieg-Brückner (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Spatial cognition IV(pp. 245-258). Berlin: Springer.
2. DIWADKAR, V. A., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
3. KELLY, J. W., AVRAAMIDES, M. N., & LOOMIS, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 1092-1107.
4. LESSELS, S., & RUDDLE, R. A. (2005). Movement around real and virtual cluttered environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14, 580-596.
5. MCNAMARA, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Spatial cognition III (pp. 174-191). Berlin: Springer.
6. MCNAMARA, T. P., RUMP, B., & WERNER, S. (2003). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 589-595.
7. MONTELLO, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment & Behavior, 23, 47-69.
8. MOU, W., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162-170.
9. RICHARDSON, A. E., MONTELLO, D. R., & HEOARTY, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27, 741-750.
10. RUDDLE, R. A., & LESSELS, S. (2006). For efficient navigational search, humans require full physical movement, but not a rich visual scene. Psychological Science, 17, 460-465.
11. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
12. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274-310.
13. VALIQUETTE, C. M., MCNAMARA, T. P., & LABRECQUE, J. S. (2007). Biased representations of the spatial structure of navigable environments. Psychological Research, 71, 288-297.
14. WERNER, S., & SCHMIDT, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 1, 447-473.
15. WILLIAMS, B., NARASIMHAM, G., WESTERMAN, C., RIESER, J., & BODENHEIMER, B. (2007). Functional similarities in spatial rep resentations between real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4 (2, No. 12).