Combining and comparing morphometric shape descriptors with a molecular phylogeny: The case of fruit type evolution in Bornean Lithocarpus (Fagaceae)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 860-880

  Cannon, Charles H ^a,b   Manos, Paul S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK   (Malaysia)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Branch length estimates; Continuous characters; Eigenshape; Enclosed receptacle; Fourier; Matrix representation

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; BORNEO; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FAGACEAE; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TIME;

BORNEO; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FAGACEAE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035527393     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351501753462849     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. APPANAH, S. 1993. Mass flowering of dipterocarp forests in the aseasonal tropics. J. Biosci. 18:457-474.
2. BALDWIN, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Mol. Phylogen. 1:3-16.
3. BARNETT, E. C. 1944. Keys to the species groups of Quercus, Lithocarpus, and Castanopsis of eastern Asia, with notes on their distributions. Tran. Bot. Soc. Edin. 34:159-204.
4. BAUM, B. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
5. BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., AND H. N. BRYANT. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Syst. Biol. 47:497-508.
6. BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., J. L. GITTLEMAN, AND A. PURVIS. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philosophic. Soc. 74:143-175.
7. BORKOWSKI, W. 1999. Fractal dimension based features are useful descriptors of leaf complexity and shape. Can. J. For. Res 29:1301-1310.
8. BROOKS, D. R. 1990. Parsimony analysis in historical biogeography and coevolution-methodological and theoretical update. Syst. Zool. 39:14-30.
9. CAMUS, E. 1948. Les chenes. Monographie des genres Quercus et Lithocarpus, Atlas, vol. 3. 7:152-165.
10. CAMUS, E. 1952-1954. Les chenes. Encyl. Econom de Sylvic. 8:511-1196.
11. CANNON, C. H., AND P. S. MANOS. 2000. The Bornean Lithocarpus Bl. section Synaedrys (Lindl.) Barnett (Fagaceae): its circumscription and description of a new species. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 133:343-357.
12. CRAMPTON, J. S. 1995. Elliptic Fourier shape-analysis of fossil bivalves-some practical considerations. Lethaia 28:179-186.
13. CRONIER, C., S. RENAUD, R. FEIST, AND J. C. AUFFRAY. 1998. Ontogeny of Trimerocephalus lelievrei (Trilobita, Phacopida), a representative of the Late Devonian phacopine paedomorphocline: a morphometric approach. Paleobiology 24:359-370.
14. CURRAN, L. M., AND C. O. WEBB. 2000. Experimental tests of the spatiotemporal scale of seed predation in mast-fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecol. Monogr. 70:129-148.
15. DAGHLIAN, C. P., AND W. L. CREPET. 1983. Oak catkins, leaves and fruits from the Oligocene Catahoula Formation and their evolutionary significance. Am. J. Bot. 70:639-649.
16. DIAZ-URIARTE, R., AND T. GARLAND. 1996. Testing hypotheses of correlated evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts: Sensitivity to deviations from Brownian motion. Syst. Biol. 45:27-47.
17. DIAZ-URIARTE, R., AND T. GARLAND. 1998. Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 47: 654-672.
18. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees-molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-163.
19. FARRIS, J. S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am. Nat. 106:645-668.
20. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
21. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1973. Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Human Gen. 25:471-492.
22. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from gene frequencies and quantitative characters: finding maximum likelihood estimates. Evolution 35:1229-1242.
23. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
24. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. ARES 19:445-471.
25. FELSENSTEIN, J. 2000. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.6. University of Washington, Seattle.
26. FERRARIO, V. F., C. SFORZA, G. SERRAO, T. FRATTINI, AND C. DELFAVERO. 1996. Shape of the human corpus callosum in childhood-Elliptic fourier analysis on midsagittal magnetic resonance scans. Invest. Radiol. 31:1-5.
27. PERSON, S., F. J. ROHLF, AND R. K. KOEHN. 1985. Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Syst. Zool. 34:59-68.
28. FORMAN, L. L. 1966a. Generic delimitation in the Castaneoideae. Kew Bull.:421-426.
29. FORMAN, L. L. 1966b. On the evolution of the cupules in the Fagaceae. Kew Bull. 18:385-419.
30. GIVNISH, T. J. 1999. On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. J. Ecol. 87:193-210.
31. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
32. ISAEV, M. A., AND L. N. DENISOVA. 1995. The computer programs for shape analysis of plant leaves in Mathematics, Computers, and Education, Pushchino.
33. ISAGI, Y., K. SUGIMURA, A. SUMIDA, AND H. ITO. 1997. How does masting happen and synchronize? J. Theor. Biol. 187(2):231-239.
34. JANZEN, D. H. 1974. Tropical blackwater rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae. 4:69-103.
35. JENKINS, R. 1993. The origin of the Fagaceous cupule. Bot. Rev. 59:81-111.
36. JULIA, S., AND E. SOEPADMO. 1998. New species and new record of Lithocarpus Blume (Fagaceae) from Sabah and Sarawak, Malaysia. Gard. Bull. Sing. 50:125-150.
37. KAUL, R. B. 1987. Reproductive structure of Lithocarpus sensu lato (Fagaceae): cymules and fruits. J. Arn. Arb. 68:73-104.
38. KAUL, R. B. 1989. Fruit structure and ecology in paleotropical Lithocarpus (Fagaceae). Pages 67-86 in Evolution, Systematics, and Fossil History of the Hamamelida (P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore, eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford.
39. KELLY, D. 1994. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. TREE 9(12):465-470.
40. KINCAID, D. T., P. J. ANDERSON, AND S. A. MORI. 1998. Leaf variation in a tree of Pourouma tomentosa (Cecropiaceae) in French Guiana. Brittonia 50:324-338.
41. KINCAID, D. T., AND R. B. SCHNEIDER. 1983. Quantification of leaf shape with a microcomputer and Fourier transform. Can. J. Bot. 61:2333-2342.
42. KUHL, F. P., AND C. R. GIARDINA. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comp. Graph. Image Proc. 18:259-278.
43. LANGDON, D. M. 1939. Ontogenetic and anatomical studies of the Fagaceae and Juglandaceae. Bot. Gaz. 101:301.
44. LAURIE, C. C., T. R. TRUE, J. J. LIU, AND J. M. MERCER. 1997. An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritana. Genetics 145:339-348.
45. LESTREL, P. E., A. BODT, AND D. R. SWINDLER. 1993. Longitudinal-study of cranial base shape changes in Macaca nemestrina. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 91:117-129.
46. LIAO, J.-C. 1969. Morphological studies on the flowers and fruits of the genus Lithocarpus in Taiwan. Nat. Taiwan Univ. Mem. Agri. 10:1-113.
47. LOHMANN, G. P., AND P. N. SCHWEITZER. 1990. On eigenshape analysis in Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop (F. J. Rohlf, and F. L. Bookstein, eds.). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor.
48. MACLEOD, N. 1999. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 25:107-138.
49. MANCHESTER, S. R. 1994. Fruits and seeds of the middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon. Palaeontographica Americana no. 58. pp. 1-205.
50. MANCUSO, S. 1999. Elliptic Fourier Analysis (EFA) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for the identification of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) genotypes. Vitis 38:73-77.
51. MANOS, P. S., Z. K. ZHOU, AND C. H. CANNON, in press. Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. Int. J. Plant Sci.
52. MANOS, P. S., J. J. DOYLE, AND K. C. NIXON. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12:333-349.
53. MARTINS, E. P. 1996. Phylogenies, spatial autoregression, and the comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 50:1750-1765.
54. MCLELLAN, T. 2000. Geographic variation and plasticity of leaf shape and size in Begonia dregei and B. homonyma (Begoniaceae). Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 132:79-95.
55. MCLELLAN, T., AND J. A. ENDLER. 1998. The relative success of some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objects. Syst. Biol. 47:264.
56. MICKEVICH, M. F. 1982. Transformation series analysis. Syst. Zool. 31(4):461-478.
57. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
58. MOOERS, A. O., S. M. VAMOSI, AND D. SCHLUTER. 1999. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in Cranes (Gruinae). Am. Nat. 154:249-259.
59. MOU, D., AND E. F. STOERMER. 1992. Separating Tabellaria (Bacillariophyceae) shape groups based on Fourier descriptors. J. Phycol. 28:386-395.
60. NG, F. S. P. 1991. Manual of forest fruits, seeds, and seedlings. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
61. NIXON, K. C. 1997. Fagaceae Dumortier. Pages 436-506 in Flora of North America (F. o. N. A. E. Committee, ed.) Oxford University Press, New York.
62. PURVIS, A. 1995. A modification to Baum and Ragan's method for combining phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 44:251-255.
63. RAGAN, M. A. 1992. Matrix representation in reconstructing phylogenetic-relationships among the eukaryotes. Biosystems 28:47-55.
64. RAY, T. S. 1992. Landmark Eigenshape analysis-homologous contours-leaf shape in Syngonium (Araceae). Am. J. Bot. 79:69-76.
65. RENAUD, S., J. MICHAUX, J. J. JAEGER, AND J. C. AUFFRAY. 1996. Fourier analysis applied to Stephanomys (Rodentia, Muridae) molars: nonprogressive evolutionary pattern in a gradual lineage. Paleobiology 22:255-265.
66. RICHARDS, R. A., AND C. ESTEVES. 1997. Stock-specific variation in scale morphology of Atlantic striped bass. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 126:908-918.
67. ROHLF, F. J. 1986. Relationships among Eigenshape Analysis, Fourier-Analysis, and Analysis of Coordinates. Math. Geol. 18:845-854.
68. ROHLF, F. J. 1990. Fitting curves to outlines. Pages 167-177 in Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop (F. J. Rohlf, and F. L. Bookstein, eds.). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor.
69. ROHLF, F. J. 1998a. tps-DIG, version 1.20. SUNY, Stony Brook.
70. ROHLF, F. J. 1998b. Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995). Syst. Biol. 47:168-173.
71. ROHLF, J. F., AND J. W. ARCHIE. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst. Zool. 33:302-317.
72. ROHLF, F. J., AND F. L. BOOKSTEIN (eds) 1990. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor.
73. ROTH, I. 1977. Fruits of Angiosperms. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin-Stuttgart.
74. ROTH, V. L. 1984. On homology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22:13-30.
75. ROTH, V. L. 1991. Homology and hierarchies: Problems solved and unresolved. J. Evol. Biol. 4:167-194.
76. SAKAI, S., K. MOMOSE, T. YUMOTO, T. NAGAMITSU, H. NAGAMASU, A. A. HAMID, AND T. NAKASHIZUKA. 1999. Plant reproductive phenology over four years including an episode of general flowering in a low-land dipterocarp forest, Sarawak, Malaysia. Am. J. Bot. 86:1414-1436.
77. SITNIKOVA, T. 1996. Bootstrap method of interior-branch test for phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13(4):605-611.
78. SOEPADMO, E. 1968a. Florae Malesianea precursores XLVII. Census of Malesian Castanopsis (Fagaceae). Reinwardtia 7:383-410.
79. SOEPADMO, E. 1968b. A revision of the genus Quercus L. subgen. Cylobalanopsis (Oersted) Schneider in Malesia. Gard. Bull. Sing. XXII:355-427.
80. SOEPADMO, E. 1970. Florae Malesianae precursores XLIX. Malesian species of Lithocarpus BL. (Fagaceae). Reinwardtia 8:197-308.
81. SOEPADMO, E. 1972. Fagaceae in Flora Malesiana (C. G. G. J. van Steenis, ed.) Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden, The Netherlands.
82. Sork, V. L. 1993. Evolutionary ecology of mast-seeding in temperate and tropical oaks (Quercus spp.). Vegetatio 108:133-147.
83. SPJUT, R. W. 1994. A systematic treatment of fruit types. Memiors of the New York Botanical Garden, v. 70. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.
84. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND W. P. MADDISON. 1987. Reconstructing ancestral states under Wagner parsimony. Math. Biosci. 87:199-229.
85. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b8. Sinauer Associates.
86. TORRES, G. J., A. LOMBARTE, AND B. MORALES-NIN. 2000. Variability of the sulcus acusticus in the sagittal otolith of the genus Merluccius (Merlucciidae). Fish Res. 46:5-13.
87. WEBB, C. O., AND D. R. PEART. 1999. Seedling density dependence promotes coexistence of Bornean rain forest trees. Ecology 80:2006-2017.
88. WIENS, J. J. 1998. Testing phylogenetic methods with tree congruence: phylogenetic analysis of polymorphic morphological characters in Phrynosomatid lizards. Syst. Biol. 47:427-444.
89. WOLFRAM, S. 1998. The Mathematica Book, version 4.0.1. Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press.