Structures, basins, and energies: A deconstruction of the Protein Coil Library

Protein Science

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1151-1161

  Perskie, Lauren L ^a   Street, Timothy O ^a,b   Rose, George D ^a,c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Protein conformation; Protein folding; Protein structure; Random coil; Unfolded state

Indexed keywords

PROLINE;

ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; ENERGY TRANSFER; HYDROGEN BOND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION;

HYDROGEN BONDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 46449114017     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.035055.108     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alexander, P.A., He, Y., Chen, Y., Orban, J., and Bryan, P.N. 2007. The design and characterization of two proteins with 88% sequence identity but different structure and function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 11963-11968.
2. Aurora, R. and Rose, G.D. 1998. Helix capping. Protein Sci. 7: 21-38.
3. Avbelj, F. and Baldwin, R.L. 2003. Role of backbone solvation and electrostatics in generating preferred peptide backbone conformations: Distributions of φ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 5742-5747.
4. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N., and Bourne, P.E. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 235-242.
5. Bolen, D.W. and Rose, G.D. 2008. Structure and energetics of the hydrogen-bonded backbone in protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77: (in press). doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.131357.
6. Bystroff, C. and Baker, D. 1998. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J. Mol. Biol. 281: 565-577.
7. Chou, P.Y. and Fasman, G.D. 1974. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, β-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry 13: 211-222.
8. Creamer, T.P. and Campbell, M.N. 2002. Determinants of the polyproline II helix from modeling studies. Adv. Protein Chem. 62: 263-282.
9. Crick, F.H. and Rich, A. 1955. Structure of polyglycine II. Nature 176: 780-781.
10. Crippen, G.M. 1978. The tree structural organization of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 126: 315-332.
11. de Brevern, A.G., Etchebest, C., and Hazout, S. 2000. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 41: 271-287.
12. Doolittle, R.F. 1986. Of Urfs and Orfs, pp. 1-103. University Science Books, Herndon, VA.
13. Doolittle, R.F. 1989. Similar amino acid sequences revisited. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14: 244-245.
14. Etchebest, C., Benros, C., Hazout, S., and de Brevern, A.G. 2005. A structural alphabet for local protein structures: Improved prediction methods. Proteins 59: 810-827.
15. Fetrow, J., Zehfus, M.H., and Rose, G.D. 1988. Protein folding: New twists. Biotechnology (NY) 6: 167-171.
16. Fitzkee, N.C. and Rose, G.D. 2004a. Reassessing random-coil statistics in unfolded proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 12497-12502.
17. Fitzkee, N.C. and Rose, G.D. 2004b. Steric restrictions in protein folding: An α-helix cannot be followed by a contiguous β-strand. Protein Sci. 13: 633-639.
18. Fitzkee, N.C. and Rose, G.D. 2005. Sterics and solvation winnow accessible conformational space for unfolded proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 353: 873-887.
19. Fitzkee, N.C., Fleming, P.J., Gong, H., Panasik Jr., N., Street, T.O., and Rose, G.D. 2005a. Are proteins made from a limited parts list? Trends Biochem. Sci. 30: 73-80.
20. Fitzkee, N.C., Fleming, P.J., and Rose, G.D. 2005b. The Protein Coil Library: A structural database of nonhelix, nonstrand fragments derived from the PDB. Proteins 58: 852-854.
21. Fleming, P.J., Gong, H., and Rose, G.D. 2006. Secondary structure determines protein topology. Protein Sci. 15: 1829-1834.
22. Gong, H. and Rose, G.D. 2008. Assessing the solvent-dependent surface area of unfolded proteins using an ensemble model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105: 3321-3326.
23. Gong, H., Isom, D.G., Srinivasan, R., and Rose, G.D. 2003. Local secondary structure content predicts folding rates for simple, two-state proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 327: 1149-1154.
24. Gong, H., Fleming, P.J., and Rose, G.D. 2005. Building native protein conformation from highly approximate backbone torsion angles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 16227-16232.
25. Govindarajan, S. and Goldstein, R.A. 1996. Why are some proteins structures so common? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 3341-3345.
26. Gunasekaran, K., Nagarajaram, H.A., Ramakrishnan, C., and Balaram, P. 1998. Stereochemical punctuation marks in protein structures: Glycine and proline containing helix stop signals. J. Mol. Biol. 275: 917-932.
27. Ho, B.K. and Brasseur, R. 2005. The Ramachandran plots of glycine and preproline. BMC Struct. Biol. 5: 14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-5-14.
28. Ho, B.K., Thomas, A., and Brasseur, R. 2003. Revisiting the Ramachandran plot: Hard-sphere repulsion, electrostatics, and H-bonding in the α-helix. Protein Sci. 12: 2508-2522.
29. Hunter, C.G. and Subramaniam, S. 2003. Protein fragment clustering and canonical local shapes. Proteins 50: 580-588.
30. Hutchinson, E.G. and Thornton, J.M. 1994. A revised set of potentials for β-turn formation in proteins. Protein Sci. 3: 2207-2216.
31. Jha, A.K., Colubri, A., Zaman, M.H., Koide, S., Sosnick, T.R., and Freed, K.F. 2005. Helix, sheet, and polyproline II frequencies and strong nearest neighbor effects in a restricted coil library. Biochemistry 44: 9691-9702.
32. Jones, T.A. and Thirup, S. 1986. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J. 5: 819-822.
33. Kamat, A.P. and Lesk, A.M. 2007. Contact patterns between helices and strands of sheet define protein folding patterns. Proteins 66: 869-876.
34. Kendrew, J.C. and Perutz, M.F. 1957. X-ray studies of compounds of biological interest. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 26: 327-372.
35. Kendrew, J.C., Bodo, G., Dintzis, H.M., Parrish, R.G., Wyckoff, H., and Phillips, D.C. 1958. A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature 181: 662-666.
36. Kopp, J., Bordoli, L., Battey, J.N., Kiefer, F., and Schwede, T. 2007. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):38-56.
37. Kortemme, T., Morozov, A.V., and Baker, D. 2003. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326: 1239-1259.
38. Lesk, A.M. and Chothia, C. 1980. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: The structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J. Mol. Biol. 136: 225-270.
39. Levitt, M. and Chothia, C. 1976. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature 261: 552-558.
40. MacArthur, M.W. and Thornton, J.M. 1991. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 218: 397-412.
41. Milner-White, E.J. 1990. Situations of γ-turns in proteins. Their relation to α-helices, β-sheets, and ligand binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 216: 386-397.
42. Mirsky, A.E. and Pauling, L. 1936. On the structure of native, denatured, and coagulated proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 22: 439-447.
43. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540.
44. Orengo, C.A., Michie, A.D., Jones, S., Jones, D.T., Swindells, M.B., and Thornton, J.M. 1997. CATH - a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5: 1093-1108.
45. Pace, C.N., Trevino, S., Prabhakaran, E., and Scholtz, J.M. 2004. Protein structure, stability and solubility in water and other solvents. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359: 1225-1235.
46. Panasik Jr., N., Fleming, P.J., and Rose, G.D. 2005. Hydrogen-bonded turns in proteins: The case for a recount. Protein Sci. 14: 2910-2914.
47. Pappu, R.V., Srinivasan, R., and Rose, G.D. 2000. The Flory isolated-pair hypothesis is not valid for polypeptide chains: Implications for protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 12565-12570.
48. Pauling, L. and Corey, R.B. 1951. Configurations of polypeptide chains with favored orientations around single bonds: Two new pleated sheets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 37: 729-740.
49. Pauling, L., Corey, R.B., and Branson, H.R. 1951. The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 37: 205-211.
50. Perutz, M.F. 1964. The hemoglobin molecule. Sci. Am. 211: 64-76.
51. Przytycka, T., Aurora, R., and Rose, G.D. 1999. A protein taxonomy based on secondary structure. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6: 672-682.
52. Qian, B., Raman, S., Das, R., Bradley, P., McCoy, A.J., Read, R.J., and Baker, D. 2007. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 450: 259-264.
53. Ramachandran, G.N. and Sasisekharan, V. 1968. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 23: 283-438.
54. Ramachandran, G.N., Sasisekharan, V., and Ramakrishnan, C. 1966. Molecular structure of polyglycine II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 112: 168-170.
55. Rose, G.D. 1979. Hierarchic organization of domains in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 134: 447-470.
56. Rose, G.D., Gierasch, L.M., and Smith, J.A. 1985. Turns in peptides and proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 37: 1-109.
57. Rose, G.D., Fleming, P.J., Banavar, J.R., and Maritan, A. 2006. A backbone-based theory of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103: 16623-16633.
58. Sasisekharan, V. 1959. Structure of poly-L-proline II. Acta Crystallogr. 12: 897-903.
59. Serrano, L. 1995. Comparison between the φ distribution of the amino acids in the protein database and NMR data indicates that amino acids have various φ propensities in the random coil conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 254: 322-333.
60. Shi, Z., Woody, R.W., and Kallenbach, N.R. 2002. Is polyproline II a major backbone conformation in unfolded proteins? Adv. Protein Chem. 62: 163-240.
61. Sims, G.E., Choi, I.G., and Kim, S.H. 2005. Protein conformational space in higher order φ-ψ maps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 618-621.
62. Smith, L.J., Bolin, K.A., Schwalbe, H., MacArthur, M.W., Thornton, J.M., and Dobson, C.M. 1996. Analysis of main chain torsion angles in proteins: Prediction of NMR coupling constants for native and random coil conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 255: 494-506.
63. Srinivasan, R. and Rose, G.D. 1995. LINUS: A hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein. Proteins 22: 81-99.
64. Street, T.O., Fitzkee, N.C., Perskie, L.L., and Rose, G.D. 2007. Physical-chemical determinants of turn conformations in globular proteins. Protein Sci. 16: 1720-1727.
65. Swindells, M.B., MacArthur, M.W., and Thornton, J.M. 1995. Intrinsic φ, ψ propensities of amino acids, derived from the coil regions of known structures. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2: 596-603.
66. Tanford, C. 1968. Protein denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 23: 121-282.
67. Unger, R. and Sussman, J.L. 1993. The importance of short structural motifs in protein structure analysis. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 7: 457-472.
68. Unger, R., Harel, D., Wherland, S., and Sussman, J.L. 1989. A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. Proteins 5: 355-373.
69. Venkatachalam, C.M. 1968. Stereochemical criteria for polypeptides and proteins. V. Conformation of a system of three linked peptide units. Biopolymers 6: 1425-1436.
70. Wang, G. and Dunbrack Jr., R.L. 2003. PISCES: A protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19: 1589-1591.