Enhanced functional and structural domain assignments using remote similarity detection procedures for proteins encoded in the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

Journal of Biosciences

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 245-259

  Namboori, Seema ^a   Mhatre, Natasha ^a   Sujatha, Sentivel ^b   Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy ^a   Pandit, Shashi Bhushan ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^b Reddy US Therapeutics   (United States)

Author keywords

Genome data analysis; Hypothetical proteins, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Protein structures; Structural and functional domains

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN;

MICROBIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL VIRULENCE; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENE FUNCTION; GENE STRUCTURE; HYPOTHESIS; LIPID METABOLISM; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS H37RV; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MYCOBACTERIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 4644275573     PISSN: 02505991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02702607     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E W and Lipman D J 1990 Basic local alignment search tool; J. Mol. Biol. 215 403-410
2. Altschul S F, Madden T L, Schäffer A A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W and Lipman D J 1997 Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search program; Nucleic Acids Res. 25 3389-3402
3. Ames G F 1993 Bacterial periplasmic permeases as model systems for the superfamily of traffic ATPases, including the multidrug resistance protein and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; Int. Rev. Cytol. 137 1-35
4. Aravind L and Ponting C P 1999 The cytoplasmic helical linker domain of receptor histidine kinase and methyl-accepting proteins is common to many prokaryotic signalling proteins; FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 176 111-115
5. Arruba S, Bomfim G, Knights R, Huima-Byron T and Riley L W 1993 Cloning of an M. tuberculosis DNA fragment associated with entry and survival inside cells; Science 261 1454-1457
6. Balaji S, Sujatha S, Kumar S S and Srinivasan N 2001 PALI- a database of Phylogeny and ALIgnment of homologous protein structures; Nucleic Acids Res. 29 61-65
7. Bork P and Gibson T J 1996 Applying motif and profile searches; Methods Enzymol. 266 162-184
8. Buchan D W, Shepherd A J, Lee D, Pearl F M, Rison S C, Thornton J M and Orengo C A 2002 Gene 3D: structural assignment for whole genes and genomes using the CATH domain structure database; Genome Res. 12 503-514
9. Camus J, Pryor M J, Medigue C and Cole S T 2002 Re-annotation of the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv; Microbiology 148 2967-2973
10. Chambers H F, Moreau D, Yajko D, Miick C, Wagner C, Hackbarth C, Kocagoz S, Rosenberg E, Hadley W K and Nikaido H 1995 Can penicillins and other beta-lactam antibiotics be used to treat tuberculosis?; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39 2620-2624
11. Chang G, Spencer R H, Lee A T, Barclay M T and Rees D C 1998 Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel; Science 282 2220-2226
12. Chothia C and Gerstein M 1997 Protein evolution. How far can sequences diverge?; Nature (London) 385 579-581
13. Chothia C and Lesk A M 1986 The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins; EMBO J. 5 823-826
14. Cole S T, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon S V, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry C E 3rd, et al 1998 Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence; Nature (London) 393 537-544
15. Cole S T 1999 Learning from the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv; FEBS Lett. 452 7-10
16. Devos D and Valencia A 2001 Intrinsic errors in genome annotation; Trends Genet. 17 429-431
17. Doran T J, Hodgson A L, Davies J K and Radford A J 1992 Characterisation of a novel repetitive DNA sequence from Mycobacterium bovis; FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 75 179-185
18. Eddy S R 1998 Profile hidden Markov models; Bioinformatics 14 755-763
19. Evans S V 1993 SETOR: hardware-lighted three-dimensional solid model representations of macromolecules; J. Mol. Graph. 11 134-138
20. Fetrow J S, Siew N, Di Gennaro J A, Martinez-Yamout M, Dyson J H and Skolnick J 2001 Genomic-scale comparison of sequence- and structure-based methods of function prediction: Does structure provide additional insight?; Protein Sci. 10 1005-1014
21. Finn J T, Grunwald M E and Yau K W 1996 Cyclic nucleotidegated ion channels an extended family with diverse functions; Annu. Rev. Physiol. 58 395-426
22. Fischer D and Eisenberg D 1999 Predicting structures for genome proteins; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9 208-211
23. Fisher M A, Plikaytis B B and Shinnick T M 2002 Microarray analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcriptional response to the acidic conditions found in phagosomes; J. Bacteriol. 184 4025-4032
24. Flesselles B, Anand N N, Remani J, Loosemore S M and Klein M H 1999 Disruption of the mycobacterial cell entry gene of Mycobacterium bovis BCG results in a mutant that exhibits a reduced invasiveness for epithelial cells; FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 177 237-242
25. Gamieldien J, Ptitsyn A and Hide W 2002 Eukaryotic genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis could have a role in pathogenesis and immunomodulation; Trends Genet. 18 5-8
26. Gardner P R, Gardner A M, Martin L A and Salzman A L 1998 Nitric oxide dioxygenase: An enzymic function for flavohemoglobin; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 10378-10383
27. George K M, Yuan Y, Sherman D R and Barry C E 1995 The Biosynthesis of Cyclopropanated Mycolic Acids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis; J Biol. Chem. 270 27292-27298
28. Gerstein M 1998 How representative are the known structures of the proteins in a complete genome? A comprehensive structural census; Fold. Des. 3 497-512
29. Gribskov M, McLachlan A D and Eisenberg D 1987 Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 4355-4358
30. Hardison R C 1996 A brief history of hemoglobins: Plant, animal, protist, and bacteria; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 5675-5679
31. Hegyi H and Gerstein M 1999 The relationship between protein structure and function a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome; J. Mol. Biol. 288 147-164
32. Higgins C F 1992 ABC transporters: From microorganisms to man; Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8 67-113.
33. Hoersch S, Leroy C, Brown N P, Andrade M A and Sander C 2000 The GeneQuiz web server protein functional analysis through the Web; Trends Biochem. Sci. 25 33-35
34. Hubbard B K, Koch M, Palmer D R, Babbitt P C and Gerlt J A 1998 Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily characterization of the (D)-glucarate/galactarate catabolic pathway in Escherichia coli; Biochemistry 37 14369-14375
35. Huynen M, Doerks T, Eisenhaber F, Orengo C, Sunyaev S, Yuan Y and Bork P 1998 Homology-based fold predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins; J. Mol. Biol. 280 323-326
36. Izard T and Blackwell N C 2000 Crystal structures of the metal-dependent 2-dehydro-3-deoxy-galactarate aldolase suggest a novel reaction mechanism; EMBO J. 19 3849-3856
37. Johnson M S, Overington J P and Blundell T L 1993 Alignment and searching for common protein folds using a data bank of structural templates; J. Mol. Biol. 231 735-752
38. Kelley L A, MacCallum R M and Sternberg M J 2000 Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM; J. Mol. Biol. 299 499-520
39. 2+ Reveals Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance; J. Mol. Biol. 247 260-280
40. Lewis S, Ashburner M and Reese M G 2000 Annotating eukaryote genomes; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10 349-354
41. Li W W, Quinn G B, Alexandrov N N, Bourne P E and Shindyalov I N 2003 A comparative proteomics resource: proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana; Genome Biol. 4 R51 Epub
42. Liu J, Rosenberg E Y and Nikaido H 1995 Fluidity of the Lipid Domain of Cell Wall From Mycobacterium chelonae; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 11254-11258
43. Letunic I, Copley R R, Schmidt S, Ciccarelli F D, Doerks T, Schultz J, Ponting C P and Bork P 2004 SMART 4·0: towards genomic data integration; Nucleic Acids Res. 32 D142-144
44. Makarova K S, Aravind L, Galperin M Y, Grishin N V, Tatusov R L, Wolf Y I and Koonin E V 1999 Comparative Genomics of the Archaea (Euryarchaeota) Evolution of Conserved Protein Families, the Stable Core, and the Variable Shell; Genome Res. 9 608-628
45. Martinac B and Kloda A 2003 Evolutionary origins of mechanosensitive ion channels; Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 82 11-24
46. McCue L A, McDonough K A and Lawrence C E 2000 Functional classification of cNMP-binding proteins and nucleotide cyclases with implications for novel regulatory pathways in Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Genome Res. 10 204-219
47. Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy A C, Bartels D, Bekel T, Clausen J, Kalinowski J, Linke B, Rupp O, Giegerich R, et al 2003 GenDB-an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes; Nucleic Acids Res. 31 2187-2195
48. Mishra R K and Kasik J E 1970 The mechanisms of mycobacterial resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins; Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 3 73-77
49. Müller A, MacCallum R M and Sternberg M J E 1999 Bench-marking PSI-BLAST in Genome Annotation; J. Mol. Biol. 293 1257-1271
50. Murzin A G and Bateman A 1997 Distant homology recognition using structural classification of proteins; Proteins (Suppl. 1) 105-112
51. Murzin A G and Brenner S E, Hubbard T and Chothia C 1995 SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures; J. Mol. Biol. 247 536-540
52. Oppermann U, Filling C, Hult M, Shafqat N, Wu X, Lindh M, Shafqat J, Nordling E, Kallberg Y, Personn B, et al 2003 Short-chain dehydrogenases/ reductases (SDR): the 2002 update; Chem. Biol. Interact. 143-144, 247-253
53. Orengo C A, Todd A E and Thornton J M 1999 From protein structure to function; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9 374-382
54. Pandit S B, Gosar D, Abhiman S, Sujatha S, Dixit S S, Mhatre N S, Sowdhamini R and Srinivasan N 2002 SUPFAM-a database of potential protein superfamily relationships derived by comparing sequence-based and structure-based families: implications for structural genomics and function annotation in genomes; Nucleic Acids Res. 30 289-293
55. Pawlowski K, Zhang B, Rychlewski L and Godzik A 1999 The Helicobacter pylori genome from sequence analysis to structural and functional predictions; Proteins 36 20-30
56. Pearl F M, Lee D, Bray J E, Buchan D W, Shepherd A J and Orengo C A 2002 The CATH extended protein-family database providing structural annotations for genome sequences; Protein Sci. 11 233-244
57. Pearson W R and Lipman D J 1988 Improved tools for biological sequence comparison; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85 2444-2448
58. Rost B, Liu J, Nair R, Wrzeszczynski K O and Ofran Y 2003 Automatic prediction of protein function; Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60 2637-2650
59. Rychlewski L, Zhang B and Godzik A 1998 Fold and function predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins; Fold Des. 3 229-238
60. Schaffer A A, Wolf Y I, Ponting C P, Koonin E V, Aravind L and Altschul S F 1999 IMPALA: matching a protein sequence against a collection of PSI-BLAST-constructed position-specific score matrices; Bioinformatics 12 1000-1011
61. Schroeder B G, Peterson L M and Fleischmann R D 2002 Improved quantitation and reproducibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA microarrays; J. Mol. MicroBiol. Biotechnol. 4 123-126
62. Snider D E Jr, Raviglione M and Kochi A 1994 Global Burden of Tuberculosis; in Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis, protection, and control (ed.) B R Bloom (Washington DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.) pp 3-11
63. Sonnhammer E L L, Eddy S R and Durbin R 1997 Pfam: A Comprehensive Database of Protein Families Based on Seed Alignments; Proteins 28 405-420
64. Sonnhammer E L L, Von Heijne G and Krogh A 1998 A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences; in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, Menlo Park, California (eds) J Glasgow, T Littlejohn, F Major, R Lathrop, D Sankoff and C Sensen, pp 175-182
65. Sousa M C and McKay D B 2001 Structure of the universal stress protein of Haemophilus influenzae; Structure (Camb) 9 1135-1141
66. Strong M, Mallick P, Pellegrini M, Thompson M J and Eisenberg D 2003 Inference of protein function and protein linkages in Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on prokaryotic genome organization a combined computational approach; Genome Biol. 4 R59 Epub
67. Tatusov R L, Galperin M Y, Natale D A and Koonin E V 2000 The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution; Nucleic Acids Res. 28 33-36
68. Thornton J M 2001 From genome to function; Science 292 2095-2097
69. Voladri R K R, Lakey D L, Hennigan S H, Menzies B E, Edwards K M and Kernodle D S 1998 Recombinant Expression and Characterization of the Major β-Lactamase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42 1375-1381
70. Wagner J, Lerner R A and Barbas C F 3rd 1995 Efficient aldolase catalytic antibodies that use the enamine mechanism of natural enzymes; Science 270 1797-1800
71. Wootton J C and Federhen S 1993 Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases; Comput. Chem. 17 149-163
72. Zhu H and Riggs A F 1992 Yeast Flavohemoglobin is an Ancient Protein Related to Globins and a Reductase Family; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 5015-5019