Strategic Processing during Comprehension

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 615-629

  Magliano, Joseph P ^a   Trabasso, Tom ^b   Graesser, Arthur C ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033261107     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.615     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1459-1468.
2. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Worthy, J., Sandora, C. A., & Kucan, L. (1996). Questioning the author: A year-long classroom implementation to engage students with text. Elementary School Journal, 96, 385-414.
3. Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Glossing and transcription conventions. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative across linguistic study (pp. 655-664). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, R., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
5. Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, M., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
6. Cote, N., & Goldman, S. R. (1998). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children's think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Cote, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1-53.
8. Dunnett, C. W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics, 20, 482-491.
9. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1994). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
10. Fletcher, C. R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 43-58.
11. Graesser, A. C., Bertus, E. L., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text. In E. J. O'Brien & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 295-319). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Graesser, A. C., & Riha, J. R. (1984). An application of multiple regression techniques in sentence reading times. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in comprehension research (pp. 183-218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
15. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
16. King, T. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Journal, 29, 303-323.
17. Kintsch, W. (1977). On comprehending stories. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 33-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
19. Knight, G. P. (1984). A survey of some important techniques and issues in multiple regression. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in comprehension research (pp. 183-218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Langston, M. C., & Trabasso, T. (1998). Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 29-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Langston, M. C., Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1999). Modeling on-line comprehension. In A. Ram & K. Moorman (Eds.), Computational models of reading and understanding (pp. 181-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Lehnert, W. G. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Long, D. L., & Bourg, T. (1996). Thinking aloud: Telling a story about a story. Discourse Processes, 21, 329-339.
24. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analysis of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
25. Lutz, M. F., & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293-310.
26. Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193-232.
27. McDaniel, M. A., & Pressley, M. (1987). Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28. Meehan, J. R. (1977). TALESPIN, an interactive program that writes stories. Proceedings From the Fifth International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 91-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 8, 231-259.
30. Olson, G. M., Duffy, S. A., & Mack, R. L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in the study of immediate processes in comprehension (pp. 253-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Olson, G. M., Mack, R. L., & Duffy, S. A. (1981). Cognitive aspects of genre. Poetics, 10, 283-315.
32. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal-teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
33. Palincsar, A. S., Brown, A. L., & Martin, S. M. (1987). Peer interaction in reading comprehension instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 231-253.
34. Pressley, M. (1990). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
35. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve memory and comprehension of what is read. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
37. Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E., Wood, E., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 291-300.
38. Pressley, M., Symons, S., McDaniel, M. A., Snyder, B. L., & Turnure, J. E. (1988). Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 268-278.
39. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530.
40. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421-441.
44. Suh, S. (1988). Converging evidence for causal inferences during comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
45. Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-301.
46. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996a). Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-288.
47. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996b). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them? In M. Graves, P. van den Broek, & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: a right of all children (pp. 160-188). New York: Columbia University Press.
48. Trabasso, T., & Ozyurek, A. (1997). Communicating evaluations in narrative understanding. In T. Givon (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, communicative, and social perspectives (pp. 269-302). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
49. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
50. Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in the representation of stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1-25.
51. van den Broek, P. W. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.
53. Whitney, P., & Budd, D. (1996). Thinking-aloud protocols and the study of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 341-351.
54. Zwaan, R. A., & Brown, C. M. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation-model construction. Discourse Processes, 21, 289-328.