Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 519-525

  Huegli, Rolf W ^a   Thalhammer, Christoph ^a   Jacob, Augustinus L ^a   Jaeger, Kurt ^a   Bilecen, Deniz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Contrast media; Intra arterial digital subtraction angiography; Intra arterial magnetic resonance angiography; Open bore MR scanner; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MEDICAL IMAGING; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; PATIENT MONITORING;

INTRA-ARTERIAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE-ANGIOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA)]; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOPENTATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAGNET; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44449129066     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Janka R., Fellner C., Wenkel E., et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil. Radiology 235 1 (2005) 319-326
2. Ruehm S.G., Hany T.F., Pfammatter T., et al. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 174 4 (2000) 1127-1135
3. Bakker C.J., Smits H.F., Bos C., et al. MR-guided balloon angioplasty: in vitro demonstration of the potential of MRI for guiding, monitoring, and evaluating endovascular interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 8 1 (1998) 245-250
4. Manke C., Nitz W.R., Djavidani B., et al. MR imaging-guided stent placement in iliac arterial stenoses: a feasibility study. Radiology 219 2 (2001) 527-534
5. Paetzel C., Zorger N., Bachthaler M., et al. Magnetic resonance-guided percutaneous angioplasty of femoral and popliteal artery stenoses using real-time imaging and intra-arterial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 40 5 (2005) 257-262
6. Wacker F.K., Hillenbrand C.M., Duerk J.L., and Lewin J.S. MR-guided endovascular interventions: device visualization, tracking, navigation, clinical applications, and safety aspects. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13 3 (2005) 431-439
7. Frayne R., Omary R.A., Unal O., and Strother C.M. Determination of optimal injection parameters for intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 10 (2000) 1277-1284
8. Hwang K.P., Green J.D., Li D., et al. Minimizing contrast agent dose during intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging 15 1 (2002) 55-61
9. Omary R.A., Henseler K.P., Unal O., et al. Validation of injection parameters for catheter-directed intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Acad Radiol 9 2 (2002) 172-185
10. Bilecen D., Schulte A.C., Heidecker H.G., et al. Lower extremity: low-dose contrast agent intraarterial MR angiography in patients-initial results. Radiology 234 1 (2005) 250-255
11. Huegli R.W., Aschwanden M., Bongartz G., et al. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison. Radiology 239 3 (2006) 901-908
12. Zorger N., Volk M., Hamer O.W., et al. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in humans for the detection of infrainguinal arterial stenoses before and after percutaneous angioplasty. Am J Roentgenol 185 4 (2005) 867-872
13. de Vries M., de Koning P.J., de Haan M.W., et al. Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses. Invest Radiol 40 8 (2005) 495-503
14. Steffens J.C., Schafer F.K., Oberscheid B., et al. Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Comparison with intraarterial DSA. Acta Radiol 44 2 (2003) 185-192
15. Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Scheidegger M.B., and Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42 5 (1999) 952-962
16. Wu Y., Goodrich K.C., Buswell H.R., Katzman G.L., and Parker D.L. High-resolution time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA by combining SENSE with keyhole and SLAM strategies. Magn Reson Imaging 22 9 (2004) 1161-1168
17. Bornert P., Stuber M., Botnar R.M., et al. Direct comparison of 3D spiral vs. Cartesian gradient-echo coronary magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 46 4 (2001) 789-794
18. Yang P.C., Nguyen P., Shimakawa A., et al. Spiral magnetic resonance coronary angiography-direct comparison of 1.5 Tesla vs. 3 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6 4 (2004) 877-884
19. Rhee T.K., Park J.K., Cashen T.A., et al. Comparison of intraarterial MR angiography at 3.0 T with X-ray digital subtraction angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 7 (2006) 1131-1137
20. Green J.D., Omary R.A., Schirf B.E., Tang R., and Li D. Catheter-directed contrast-enhanced coronary MR angiography in swine using magnetization-prepared True-FISP. Magn Reson Med 50 6 (2003) 1317-1321
21. Omary R.A., Frayne R., Unal O., Grist T.M., and Strother C.M. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced 2D and 3D MR angiography: a preliminary study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10 10 (1999) 1315-1321
22. Omary R.A., Frayne R., Unal O., et al. MR-guided angioplasty of renal artery stenosis in a pig model: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 3 (2000) 373-381
23. Potthast S., Schulte A.C., Bongartz G.M., et al. Low-dose intra-arterial contrast-enhanced MR aortography in patients based on a theoretically derived injection protocol. Eur Radiol 15 11 (2005) 2347-2353
24. Schulte A.C., Bongartz G., Huegli R., et al. Intraarterial versus IV gadolinium injections for MR angiography: quantitative and qualitative assessment of the infrainguinal arteries. Am J Roentgenol 185 3 (2005) 735-740
25. Guyton A., and Hall J. Local control of blood flow by tissue and humeral regulation. 10th ed. (2000), WB Saunders, New York p. 175-253
26. Wang Y., Chen C.Z., Chabra S.G., et al. Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 37 8 (2002) 458-463
27. Korosec F.R., Frayne R., Grist T.M., and Mistretta C.A. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 36 3 (1996) 345-351
28. Bilecen D., Jager K.A., Aschwanden M., et al. Cuff-compression of the proximal calf to reduce venous contamination in contrast-enhanced stepping-table magnetic Resonance angiography. Acta Radiol 45 5 (2004) 510-515
29. Loewe C., Schoder M., Rand T., et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. Am J Roentgenol 179 4 (2002) 1013-1021
30. Wang Y., Truong T.N., Yen C., et al. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents. Magn Reson Med 49 5 (2003) 972-976
31. Buecker A., Spuentrup E., Ruebben A., and Gunther R.W. Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent. Circulation 105 15 (2002) 1772-1775
32. Eggebrecht H., Rodermann J., Hunold P., et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Novel magnetic resonance-compatible coronary stent: the absorbable magnesium-alloy stent. Circulation 112 18 (2005) e303-e304