Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison

Radiology

Volumn 239, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 901-906

  Huegli, Rolf W ^a   Aschwanden, Markus ^a   Bongartz, Georg ^a   Jaeger, Kurt ^a   Heidecker, Hans Georg ^a   Thalhammer, Christoph ^a   Schulte, Anja Carina ^b   Hashagen, Claus ^a   Jacob, Augustinus L ^a   Bilecen, Deniz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; HEPARIN; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; ARTIFACTS; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THIGH;

EID: 33744785684     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2393041574     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Criqui MH, Fronet A, Barrett-Connor E, Klauber MR, Gabriel S, Goodman D. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in a defined population. Circulation 1985;71:510-515.
2. Mohler ER 3rd. Peripheral arterial disease: identification and implications. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2306-2314.
3. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:171-179.
4. Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1013-1021.
5. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR angiography for assessment of peripheral vascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40:835-846.
6. Winterer JT, Schaefer O, Uhrmeister P, et al. Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur J Radiol 2002;41:153-160.
7. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-792.
8. Rofsky NM, Adelman MA. MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 2000;214:325-338.
9. Frayne R, Omary RA, Unal O, Strother CM. Determination of optimal injection parameters for intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:1277-1284.
10. Omary RA, Frayne R, Unal O, Grist TM, Stroher CM. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced 2D and 3D MR angiography: a preliminary study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999;10:1315-1321.
11. Omary RA, Frayne R, Unal O, et at. MR-guided angioplasty of renal artery stenosis in a pig model: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:373-381.
12. Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, et al. Validation of injection parameters for catheter-directed intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Acad Radiol 2002;9:172-185.
13. Omary RA, Unal O, Koscielski DS, et al. Realtime MR imaging-guided passive catheter tracking with use of gadolinium-filled catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:1079-1085.
14. Strother CM, Unal O, Frayne R, et al. Endovascular treatment of experimental canine aneurysms: feasibility with MR imaging guidance. Radiology 2000;215:516-519.
15. Hwang KP, Green JD, Li D, et al. Minimizing contrast agent dose during intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:55-01.
16. Serfaty JM, Yang X, Aksit P, Quick HH, Solaiyappan M, Atalar E. Toward MRI-guided coronary catheterization: visualization of guiding catheters, guidewires, and anatomy in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:590-594.
17. Bilecen D, Schulte AC, Heidecker HG, et al. Lower extremity: low-dose contrast agent intraarterial MR angiography in patients-initial results. Radiology 2005;234:250-255.
18. Jacob AL, Stock KW, Proske M, Steinbrich W. Lower extremity angiography: improved image quality and outflow vessel detection with bilaterally antegrade selective digital subtraction angiography-a blinded prospective intraindividual comparison with aortic flush digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 1996;31:184-193.
19. Pruessmann ICP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
20. Korosec FR, Frayrie R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-331.
21. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haari MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692.
22. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et. al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67.
23. Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, et al. Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of venal artery stenosis in pigs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:119-123.
24. Bos C, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Selective contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:575-582.
25. Guyton A, Hall J. Local control of blood flow by tissue and humeral regulation. New York, NY: Saunders, 2000.
26. Bilecen D, Schulte AC, Bongartz G, Heidecker HG, Aschwanden M, Jager KA. Infragenual cuff-compression reduces venous contamination in contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the calf. J Magn Reson imaging 2004;20:347-351.
27. Wang Y, Truong TN, Yen C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:972-976.
28. Buecker A, Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Gunther RW. Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent. Circulation 2002;105:1772-1775.