Lower extremity: Low-dose contrast agent intraarterial MR angiography in patients - Initial results

Radiology

Volumn 234, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 250-255

  Bilecen, Deniz ^a   Schulte, Anja Carina ^b   Heidecker, Hanns C ^a   Aschwanden, Markus ^a   Huegli, Rolf ^a   Jaeger, Kurt A ^a   Ostheim Dzerowycz, Wladimir ^c   Bongartz, Georg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

BOLUS INJECTION; FEMORAL ARTERY; FEMUR; FLOW RATE; GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THIGH;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTERIAL; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 10644222025     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2341040508     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:170-177.
2. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211:59-67.
3. Ho KY, Leiner T, van Engelshoven JM. MR angiography of run-off vessels. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:1285-1289.
4. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:683-692.
5. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, DeSena S, Meissner MH. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:599-604.
6. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, Williams DM, Wakefield T, Chenevert TL. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:283-291.
7. Frayne R, Omary RA, Unal O, Strother CM. Determination of optimal injection parameters for intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:1277-1284.
8. Bos C, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Selective contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44:575-582.
9. Omary RA, Frayne R, Unal O, Grist TM, Strother CM. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced 2D and 3D MR angiography: a preliminary study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1315-1321.
10. Omary RA, Unal O, Koscielski DS, et al. Real-time MR imaging-guided passive catheter tracking with use of gadolinium-filled catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:1079-1085.
11. Omary RA, Frayne R, Unal O, et al. MR-guided angioplasty of renal artery stenosis in a pig model: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:373-381.
12. Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, et al. Validation of injection parameters for catheter-directed intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:172-185.
13. Strother CM, Unal O, Frayne R, et al. Endovascular treatment of experimental canine aneurysms: feasibility with MR imaging guidance. Radiology 2000; 215:516-519.
14. Hwang KP, Green JD, Li D, et al. Minimizing contrast agent dose during intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:55-61.
15. Serfaty JM, Atalar E, Declerck J, et al. Real-time projection MR angiography: feasibility study. Radiology 2000; 217:290-295.
16. Serfaty JM, Yang X, Aksit P, Quick HH, Solaiyappan M, Atalar E. Toward MRI-guided coronary catheterization: visualization of guiding catheters, guidewires, and anatomy in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:590-594.
17. Svensson J, Petersson JS, Stahlberg F, Larsson EM, Leander P, Olsson LE. Image artifacts due to a time-varying contrast medium concentration in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:919-928.
18. Jager KA, Ricketts HJ, Stradness DE. Duplex scanning for evaluation of lower limb arterial disease. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1985; 619-631.
19. Green JD, Omary RA, Schirf BE, Tang R, Li D. Catheter-directed contrast-enhanced coronary MR angiography in swine using magnetization-prepared True-FISP. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50:1317-1321.
20. Goyen M, Debatin JF. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced three-dimensional MR-angiography: dosing, safety, and efficacy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19:261-273.
21. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:345-351.
22. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:952-962.
23. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R, et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 2002; 224:55-61.