Magnetic resonance-guided percutaneous angioplasty of femoral and popliteal artery stenoses using real-time imaging and intra-arterial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 257-262

  Paetzel, Christian ^a,c   Zorger, Niels ^a   Bachthaler, Maike ^a   Hamer, Okka W ^a   Stehr, Alexander ^b   Feuerbach, Stefan ^a   Lenhart, Markus ^a   Völk, Markus ^a   Herold, Thomas ^a   Kasprzak, Piotr ^b   Nitz, Wolfgang R ^a  

^a Department of Diagnostic Radiology ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Intra arterial; MR angiography; MR guided

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; LEG BLOOD FLOW; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS ANGIOPLASTY; MALE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 20244380339     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000159876.09033.2e     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Pfammatter T, Zimmerman-Paul GG, Hilfiker PR, et al. MR guided percutaneous angioplasty of iliac and femoral artery stenoses in an interventional MR-system. Radiology. 1998;209:338.
2. Manke C, Nitz WR, Djavidani B, et al. Imaging-guided stent placement in iliac arterial stenoses: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;219: 527-534.
3. Nitz WR, Oppelt A, Renz W, et al. On the heating of linear conducting structures as guidewires and catheter in interventional MR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:105-114.
4. Buecker A, Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, et al. New metallic MR stents for artifact-free coronary MR angiography: feasibility study in a swine model. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:250-253.
5. Paetzel C, Zorger N, Seitz J, et al. Intraarterial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the aortoiliac system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:981-984.
6. Tello R, Mitchel PJ, Melhem ER, et al. Interventional catheter magnetic resonance angiography with a conventional 1.5-T magnet: work in progress. Australas Radiol. 1999;43:435-439.
7. Zorger N, Lenhart M, Hamer O, et al. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in humans: feasibility and accuracy for detection of infrainguinal arterial stenoses before and after percutaneous angioplasty. A JR., in press.
8. Fink C, Bock M, Umathum R, et al. Renal embolization: feasibility of magnetic resonance-guidance using active catheter tracking and intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:111-119.
9. Duda SH, Feuls R, de Jong P, et al. Economical analyses in interventional radiology. Rofo. 2002;174:149-59.
10. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Schurink GW, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:435-444.
11. Lenhart M, Finkenzeller T, Paetzel C, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the routine work-up of the lower extremity arteries. Rofo. 2002;174:1289-95.
12. Schild HH, Weber W, Boeck E, et al. Gadolinium-DTPA (Magnevist) as a contrast medium for arterial DSA. Rofo. 1994;160:218-221.
13. Hatrick AG, Jarosz JM, Irvine AT. Gadopentate dimeglumine as an alternative contrast agent for use in interventional procedures. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:948-952.
14. Frayne F, Omary RA, Unal O, et al. Determination of optimal injection parameters for intraarterial gadolinum-enhanced MR angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1277-1284.
15. Hwang KP, Green JD, Li D, et al. Minimizing contrast agent dose during intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:55-61.
16. Green JD, Omary RA, Finn JP. Two- and three-dimensional MR coronary angiography with intraarterial injections of contrast agent in dogs: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2003;226:272-277.
17. Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, et al. Comparison of intraarterial and iv gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs. AJR. 2002;178:119-123.
18. Zorger N, Manke C, Lenhart M, et al. Peripheral arterial balloon angioplasty: effect of short versus long balloon inflation times on the morphologic results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:355-359.