Comparison of intraarterial MR angiography at 3.0 T with x-ray digital subtraction angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis in swine

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1131-1137

  Rhee, Thomas K ^a   Park, Jonathan K ^a   Cashen, Ty A ^a,b   Shin, Wanyong ^a,b   Schirf, Brian E ^a   Gehl, James A ^a   Larson, Andrew C ^a   Carr, James C ^a   Li, Debiao ^a,b   Carroll, Timothy J ^a,b   Omary, Reed A ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CATHETER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HEMODYNAMICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; STUDENT T TEST; SWINE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

EID: 33748260400     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000228469.10687.2C     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dieter RS, Schmidt WS, Pacanowski JP et al. Renovascular hypertension. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2005; 3:413-422.
2. Krijnen P, van Jaarsveld BC, Steyerberg EW, et al. A clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:705-711.
3. Schwerk WB, Restrepo IK, Stellwaag M, et al. Renal artery stenosis: grading with image-directed Doppler US evaluation of renal resistive index. Radiology 1994; 190:785-790.
4. Olin JW, Piedmonte MR, Young JR, et al. The utility of duplex ultrasound scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122:833-838.
5. Lufft V, Hoogestraat-Lufft L, Fels LM, et al. Contrast media nephropathy: intravenous CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in renal artery stenosis: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40:236-242.
6. Wittenberg G, Kenn W, Tschammler A, et al. Spiral CT angiography of renal arteries: comparison with angiography. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:546-551.
7. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Bock M, et al. Renal artery stenosis: grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase-contrast MR blood flow measurements. Radiology 1997; 203:45-53.
8. van der Hulst VP, van Baalen J, Kool LS, et al. Renal artery stenosis: endovascular flow wire study for validation of Doppler US. Radiology 1996; 200:165-168.
9. Volk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1583-1588.
10. Masunaga H, Takehara Y, Isoda H, et al. Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1213-1219.
11. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:345-351.
12. Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Sakaguchi T, et al. Abdomen, pelvis, and extremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography-initial experience. Radiology 2000; 216:909-915.
13. Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, et al. Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:119-123.
14. Wilson MW, Fidelman N, Weber OM, et al. Experimental renal artery embolization in a combined MR imaging/angiographic unit. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:1169-1175.
15. Yokota SD, Benyajati S, Dantzler WH. Comparative aspects of glomerular filtration in vertebrates. Ren Physiol 1985; 8:193-221.
16. Yang X, Bolster BDJr., Kraitchman DL, et al. Intravascular MR-monitored balloon angioplasty: an in vivo feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9:953-959.
17. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:1202-1210.
18. Omary RA, Gehl JA, Schirf BE, et al. MR imaging- versus conventional Xray fluoroscopy-guided renal angioplasty in swine: prospective randomized comparison. Radiology 2006; 238:489-496.
19. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:1228-1235.
20. Rieumont MJ, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, et al. Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am Roentgenol 1997; 169:39-44.
21. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:158-169.
22. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16:685-696.
23. Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Petermann GM, et al. Carotid bifurcation: evaluation of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2001; 220:525-532.
24. Wieben O, Grist TM, Hany TF, et al. Time-resolved 3D MR angiography of the abdomen with a real-time system. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52:921-926.
25. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 2002; 225:43-52.
26. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multi-injection time-resolved MR angiography-initial results. Radiology 2001; 221:266-272.
27. Martin AJ, Saloner DA, Roberts TP, et al. Carotid stent delivery in an XMR suite: immediate assessment of the physiologic impact of extracranial revascularization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26:531-537.