Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: Diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 174, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1127-1135

  Ruehm, Stefan G ^a,b   Hany, Thomas F ^a   Pfammatter, Thomas ^a   Schneider, Ernst ^a   Ladd, Mark ^a,b   Debatin, Jörg F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0034127427     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741127     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Borrello JA. MR angiography versus conventional x-ray angiography in the lower extremities: everyone wins (editorial). Radiology 1993;187:615-617
2. Shehadi WH, Toniolo G. Adverse reactions to contrast media: a report from the Committee on Safety of Contrast Media of the International Society of Radiology Radiology 1980;137:299-302
3. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981;138:273-281
4. Shehadi WH. Contrast media adverse reactions: occurrence, recurrence, and distribution patterns. Radiology 1982;143:11-17
5. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Boland JP, et al. Complications of arteriography in a recent series of 707 cases: factors affecting outcome. Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7:122-129
6. Lilly MP, Reichman W, Sarazen AA Jr, Carney WI Jr. Anatomic and clinical factors associated with complications of transfemoral arteriography. Ann Vasc Surg 1990;4:264-269
7. Grollman JH Jr, Marcus R. Transbrachial arteriography: techniques and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1988;11:32-35
8. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182:243-246
9. Snidow JJ, Aisen AM, Harris VJ, et al. Iliac artery MR angiography: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced and two-dimensional time-of-flight techniques. Radiology 1995;196:371-378
10. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR 1995;165:431-437
11. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191:155-164
12. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-792
13. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;200:569-571
14. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries with breath-hold contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography: comparison with conventional angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357-362
15. Owen RS, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Cope C. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187:627-635
16. Yucel EK, Kaufmann JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187:637-641
17. Carpenter JP, Owen RS, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:807-815
18. Schiebler ML, Listerud J, Holland G, Owen R, Baum R, Kressel HY. Magnetic resonance angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities. Invest Radiol 1992;27:90-96
19. Snidow JJ, Harris VJ, Trerotola SO, et al. Interpretations and treatment decisions based upon MR angiography compared to those based upon conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:595-603
20. McCauley TR, Monib A, Dickey KW, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: accuracy and reliability of time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994;192:351-357
21. Quinn SF, Demlow TA, Hallin RW, Eidemiller LR, Szumowski J. Femoral MR angiography versus conventional angiography: preliminary results. Radiology 1991;178:695-700
22. Davis CP, Schopke WD, Seifert B, Schneider E, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial disease before and after transluminal angioplasty. AJR 1997;168:1027-1034
23. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 1992;326: 1577-1581
24. Yucel EK, Silver MS, Carter AP. MR angiography of normal pelvic arteries: comparison of signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratio for three different inflow techniques. AJR 1994;136:197-201
25. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Radjenovic A, Kassner AP, Kouwenhoven M. Bolus chase gadolinium-enhanced MRA of the aorta and lower limb vessels with a "stepping table": comparison with catheter angiography. Radiology 1999;211:59-67
26. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufmann JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881
27. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-351
28. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692
29. Twieg DB. The k-trajectory formulation of the NMR imaging process with applications in analysis and synthesis of imaging methods. Med Phys 1983;10:610-621
30. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breathhold 3D MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:552-557
31. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;202:333-338
32. Leung DA, Hoffmann U, Pfammatter T, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography versus duplex sonography for diagnosing renovascular disease. Hypertension 1999;33:726-731