Providing all students ACCESS to self-regulated literacy learning

Reading Teacher

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 628-635

  Parsons, Seth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44349099342     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.61.8.4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allington, R.L. (2005). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs (2nd ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Baker, L., & Beall, L. (in press). Metacognitive processes and reading comprehension. In S.E. Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension. New York: Routledge.
3. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.
4. Bogner, K., Raphael, L.M., & Pressley, M. (2002). How grade 1 teachers motivate literate activity by their students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 135-165.
5. Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Dole, J.A., Nokes, J.D., & Drits, D. (in press). Cognitive strategy instruction. In S.E. Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension. New York: Routledge.
7. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159-199.
8. Duffy, G.G. (1991). What counts in teacher education? Dilemmas in educating empowered teachers. In J. Lutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction, 40th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1-18). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
9. Duffy, G.G. (2003). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies. New York: Guilford.
10. Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M.S., et al. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 347-368.
11. Duke, NX, Purcell-Gates, V., Hall, L.A., & Tower, C. (2006/2007). Authentic literacy activities for developing comprehension and writing. The Reading Teacher, 60(4), 344-355.
12. Fairbanks, CM. (2000). Fostering adolescents' literacy engagements: "Kid's business" and critical inquiry. Reading Research and Instruction, 40(1), 35-50.
13. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
14. Gee, J.P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
15. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H.L. Swanson, K.R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford.
16. Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 1-29.
17. Guthrie, J.T., & Humenick, N.M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18. Guthrie, J.T., &Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Hacker, D.J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Gaesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K.M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3 & 4), 313-350.
21. Miller, S.D. (2003). How high- and low-challenge tasks affect motivation and learning: Implications for struggling learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 39-57.
22. Miller, S.D., &Meece, J.L. (1997). Enhancing elementary students' motivation to read and write: A classroom intervention study. Journal of Educational Research, 90(5), 286-299.
23. Miller, S.D., & Meece, J.L. (1999). Third-graders' motivational preferences for reading and writing tasks. Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 19-35.
24. Moje, E.B. (1999). From expression to dialogue: A study of social action literacy projects in an urban school setting. The Urban Review, 31(3), 305-330.
25. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. Paris, S.G., Wasik, B.A., & Turner, J.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Perry, N.E. Hutchinson, L., &Thauberger, C. (2007). Mentoring student teachers to design and implement literacy tasks that support self-regulated reading and writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 27-50.
28. Perry, N.E., Phillips, L., & Dowler, J. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1854-1878.
29. Perry, N.E., Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning. Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237-254.
30. Perry, N.E., Turner, J.C., & Meyer, D.K. (2006). Classrooms as contexts for motivating learning. In P.A. Alexander & P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 327-348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
32. Randi, J., & Como, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In M Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 651-685). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
34. Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Rust, F. (with Snowden, J.B., Gordon, E., et al.). (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 275-326). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Teale, W.H., & Gambrell, L.B. (2007). Raising urban students' literacy achievement by engaging in authentic, challenging work. The Reading Teacher, 60(8), 728-739.
37. Tomlinson, CA. (2004). Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Roeper Review, 26(4), 188.
38. Turner, J.C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 410-441.
39. Turner, J.C., & Paris, S.G. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children's motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 662-675.
40. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.