Comparison of Forces Generated During Root Canal Shaping and Residual Stresses of Three Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files by Using a Three-Dimensional Finite-element Analysis

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 743-747

  Kim, Hyeon Cheol ^a   Cheung, Gary Shun Pan ^c   Lee, Chan Joo ^b   Kim, Byung Min ^b   Park, Jeong Kil ^a   Kang, Soon Il ^a  

^a Pusan National University Yangsan   (South Korea)

^b Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; NiTi rotary files; residual stresses; screwing; stress distribution

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PHASE TRANSITION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TORQUE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; NICKEL; PHASE TRANSITION; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 43549102627     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ruddle C.J. Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. In: Cohen S., and Burns R.C. (Eds). Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. (2002), CV Mosby, St Louis 231-291
2. Walia H.M., Brantley W.A., and Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14 (1988) 346-351
3. Schäfer E., Schulz-Bongert U., and Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 30 (2004) 432-435
4. Chen J.L., and Messer H.H. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique. Aust Dent J 47 (2002) 12-20
5. Garip Y., and Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 452-457
6. Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92 (2001) 215-220
7. Hata G., Uemura M., Kato A.S., Imura N., Novo N.F., and Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 28 (2002) 316-321
8. Ankrum M.T., Hartwell G.R., and Truitt J.E. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved root of molars. J Endod 30 (2004) 234-237
9. Bergmans L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Beullens M., Wevers M., Van Meerbeek B., and Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 288-295
10. Clauder T., and Baumann M.A. ProTaper NT system. Dent Clin North Am 48 (2004) 87-111
11. Peters O.A., Peters C.I., Schönenberger K., and Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 86-92
12. Hong E.S., Park J.K., Hur B., and Kim H.C. Comparison of shaping ability between various hybrid instrumentation methods with Pro Taper. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31 (2006) 11-19
13. Sattapan B., Nervo G.J., Palamara J.E., and Messer H.H. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 26 (2000) 161-165
14. Martín B., Zelada G., Varela P., et al. Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 262-266
15. Peng B., Shen Y., Cheung G.S.P., and Xia T.J. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: longitudinal examination. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 550-557
16. Cheung G.S.P., Peng B., Bian Z., Shen Y., and Darvell B.W. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 802-809
17. Xu X., Eng M., Zheng Y., and Eng D. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections. J Endod 32 (2006) 372-375
18. Wang G.Z. A finite element analysis of evolution of stress-strain and martensite transformation in front of a notch in shape memory alloy NiTi. Mater Sci Eng A 460-1 (2007) 383-391
19. Alapati S.B., Brantley W.A., Svec T.A., Powers J.M., and Mitchell J.C. Scanning electron microscope observations of new and used nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 29 (2003) 667-669
20. Spili P., Parashos P., and Messer H.H. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 31 (2005) 845-850
21. Cheung G.S.P., Bian Z., Shen Y., Peng B., and Darvell B.W. Comparison of defects in ProTaper hand-operated and engine-driven instruments after clinical use. Int Endod J 40 (2007) 169-178
22. Tripi T.R., Bonaccorso A., and Condorelli G.G. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102 (2006) e106-e114
23. Plotino G., Grande N.M., Sorci E., Malagnino V.A., and Somma F. Influence of a brushing working motion on the fatigue life of NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 40 (2007) 45-51
24. Grande N.M., Plotino G., Pecci R., Bedini R., Malagnino V.A., and Somma F. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J 39 (2006) 755-763
25. Lopes H.P., Moreira E.J., Elias C.N., de Almeida R.A., and Neves M.S. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J Endod 33 (2007) 55-57
26. Yao J.H., Schwartz S.A., and Beeson T.J. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod 32 (2006) 55-57
27. Ullmann C.J., and Peters O.A. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 31 (2005) 183-186
28. Cheung G.S.P., and Darvell B.W. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument: part 2-fractographic analysis. Int Endod J 40 (2007) 619-625
29. Wei X., Ling J., Jiang J., Huang X., and Liu L. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod 33 (2007) 276-279
30. Parashos P., and Messer H.H. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 32 (2006) 1031-1043
31. ElAyouti A., Weiger R., and Löst C. Frequency of overinstrumentation with an acceptable radiographic working length. J Endod 27 (2001) 49-52
32. Schrader C., and Peters O.A. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod 31 (2005) 120-123
33. Abujudom D.N., Thoma P.E., and Fariabi S. The effect of cold work and heat treatment on the phase transformations of rear equiatomic NiTi shape memory alloy. Mater Sc Forum 56-58 (1990) 565-570
34. Kuhn G., Tavernier B., and Jordan L. Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure. J Endod 27 (2001) 516-520
35. Cheung G.S.P., and Darvell B.W. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument: part 1-strain-life relationship. Int Endod J 40 (2007) 612-618
36. Cheung G.S.P., Shen Y., and Darvell B.W. Effect of environment on low-cycle fatigue of a nickel-titanium instrument. J Endod 33 (2007) 1433-1437
37. Spanaki-Voreadi A.P., Kerezoudis N.P., and Zinelis S. Failure mechanism of ProTaper Ni-Ti rotary instruments during clinical use: fractographic analysis. Int Endod J 39 (2006) 171-178
38. Yared G.M., Bou Dagher F.E., and Machtou P. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator's proficiency on ProFile failures. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 47-53
39. Di Fiore P.M. A dozen ways to prevent nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 138 (2007) 196-201