Comparison of defects in ProTaper hand-operated and engine-driven instruments after clinical use

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 169-178

  Cheung, G S P ^a   Bian, Z ^b   Shen, Ya ^b   Peng, Bin ^b   Darvell, B W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Fatigue; Fracture; Nickel titanium; ProTaper; Rotary instrument; Shear

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; RECYCLING; SHEAR STRENGTH;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT REUSE; HUMANS; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 33846941149     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: 13652591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01200.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Nusstein JM, Daehn GS (2005) SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. Journal of Endodontics 31, 40-3.
2. Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Truitt JE (2004) K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. Journal of Endodontics 30, 234-7.
3. ASM International (1987) ASM Handbook. vol. 12: Fractography. Materials Park, OH: The Materials Information Society, pp. 12-165.
4. Bahia MG, Buono VT (2005) Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology 100, 249-55.
5. Barbakow F, Lutz F (1997) The 'Lightspeed' preparation technique evaluated by Swiss clinicians after attending continuing education courses. International Endodontic Journal 30, 46-50.
6. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P (2001) Mechanical root canal prearation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry 14, 324-33.
7. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A (2003) Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: Pro-Taper versus ProFile. Journal of Endodontics 29, 15-9.
8. Blatt FJ (1992) Modern Physics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9. Blum JY, Cohen A, Machtou P, Micallef JP (1999) Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using ProFile NiTi rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal 32, 24-31.
10. Cheung GSP, Peng B, Shen Y, Bian Z, Darvell BW (2005) Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. International Endodontic Journal 38, 802-9.
11. Fife D, Gambarini G, Britto LL (2004) Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments after clinical use. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology 97, 251-6.
12. Gambarini G (2000) Rationale for the use of low-torque endodontic motors in root canal instrumentation. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 16, 95-100.
13. Gere JM (2001) Mechanics of Materials, 5th edn. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 187-270.
14. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE (1995) A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni- Ti engine-driven and K-Flex endodontic instruments. Journal of Endodontics 21, 146-51.
15. Haïkel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C (1999) Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickeltitanium endodontic instruments. Journal of Endodontics 25, 434-40.
16. Hull D (1999) Fractography: Observing, Measuring and Interpreting Fracture Surface Topography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Knowles KI, Ibarrola JL, Christiansen RK (1996) Assessing apical deformation and transportation following the use of LightSpeed root-canal instruments. International Endodontic Journal 29, 113-7.
18. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L (2001) Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure. Journal of Endodontics 27, 516-20.
19. UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP (2002) Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests. Journal of Endodontics 28, 448-51.
20. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer H (2004) Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. Journal of Endodontics 30, 722-5.
21. Patiño PV, Biedma BM, Liébana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG (2005) The influence of a manual glide-path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. Journal of Endodontics 31, 114-6.
22. Peng B, Shen Y, Cheung GSP, Xia TJ (2005) Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: longitudinal examination. International Endodontic Journal 38, 550-7.
23. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F (2003a) ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. International Endodontic Journal 36, 93-9.
24. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F (2003b) ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. International Endodontic Journal 36, 86-92.
25. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL (1997) Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of Endodontics 23, 77-85.
26. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr. (1985) The 'balance force' concept for instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of Endodontics 11, 203-11.
27. Roland DD, Andelin WE, Browning DF, Hsu GH, Torabinejad M (2002) The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments. Journal of Endodontics 28, 543-5.
28. Ruddle CJ (2001) The ProTaper endodontic system: geometries, features and guidelines for use. Dentistry Today 20, 60-7.
29. Ruddle CJ (2002) Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 8th edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, pp. 231-92.
30. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA, Messer HH (2000) Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. Journal of Endodontics 26, 161-5.
31. Schilder H, Yee FS (1984) Canal debridement and disinfection. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 3rd edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, pp. 175.
32. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Pang B (2006) Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. Journal of Endodontics 32, 61-5.
33. Spanaki-Voreadi AP, Kerezoudis NP, Zinelis S (2006) Failure mechanism of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments during clinical use: fractographic analysis. International Endodontic Journal 39, 171-8.
34. Suresh S (1998) Fatigue of Materials, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256-80.
35. Tseng PSK (2004) Root canal preparation with hand ProTapers. In: Wei SHY, ed. Contemporary Endodontics 2004, Hong Kong, China: Dentsply Asia, pp. 14-6.
36. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM (2000) Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. Journal of Endodontics 26, 414-7.
37. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA (2005) Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Journal of Endodontics 31, 183-6.
38. Xu X, Zheng Y (2006) Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections. Journal of Endodontics 32, 372-5.
39. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK (2002) Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. International Endodontic Journal 35, 7-12.
40. Yun H, Kim SK (2003) A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 95, 228-33.