ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: Effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 86-92

  Peters, Ove A ^a,c   Peters, C I ^b,c   Schonenberger K ^c   Barbakow, F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Canal geometry; ProTaper; Shape; Transportation

Indexed keywords

NICKEL; TITANIUM; DENTAL ALLOY; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; ERROR; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; MORPHOMETRICS; PERFORMANCE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; THICKNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH ROOT; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ODONTOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; HUMANS; MAXILLA; MOLAR; NICKEL; ODONTOMETRY; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0038146984     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00626.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alison DA, Weber CR, Walton RE (1979) The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. Journal of Endodontics 5, 298-304.
2. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P (2001) A methodology for quantitative evaluation of root canal instrumentation using microcomputed tomography. International Endodontic Journal 34, 390-8.
3. Blum JY, Machtou P, Micallef JP (1999) Location of contact areas on rotary ProFile instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preparation on extracted teeth. International Endodontic Journal 32, 108-14.
4. Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP (1987) A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 13, 243-5.
5. Bryant ST, Dummer PMH, Pitoni C, Bourba M, Moghal S (1999) Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. International Endodontic Journal 32, 155-64.
6. Dalton BC, Ørstavik D, Philips C, Pettiette M, Trope M (1998) Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 24, 763-7.
7. Deplazes P, Peters O, Barbakow F (2001) Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary and nickel-titanium hand instruments. Journal of Endodontics 27, 196-202.
8. Gluskin AH, Brown DC, Buchanan LS (2001) A reconstructed computerized tomography comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. International Endodontic Journal 34, 476-84.
9. Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD, Carnes DL, Lancaster JL (1995) Microcomputed tomography: an advanced system for detailed endodontic research. Journal of Endodontics 21, 561-8.
10. Peters OA, Barbakow F (2002) Dynamic torque and apical forces of ProFile .04 rotary instruments during preparation of curved canals. International EndodonticJournal 35, 379-89.
11. Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN, Barbakow F (2001b) Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics 27, 1-6.
12. Peters OA, Laib A, Rüegsegger P, Barbakow F (2000) Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry using high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Dental Research 79, 1405-9.
13. Peters OA. Schönenberger K, Laib A (2001a) Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. International Endodontic Journal 34, 221-30.
14. Peters LB, van Winkelhoff A-J, Bujis JF, Wesselink PR (2002) Effects of instrumentation, irrigation and dressing with calcium hydroxide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical bone lesions. International EndodonticJournal 35, 13-21.
15. Rhodes JS, Pitt Ford TR, Lynch PI, Liepins PJ, Curtis RV (2000) A comparison of two nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques in teeth using microcomputed tomography. International Endodontic Journal 33, 279-85.
16. Ruddle C (2001) The ProTaper endodontic system: geometries, features and guidelines for use. Dentistry Today 20, 60-7.
17. Ruddle C (2002) Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 8th edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 231-92.
18. Tucker DM,Wenckus CS (1997) Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 23, 170-3.
19. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldmann M, Lin PS (1983) A scanning electron microscopic study of a high-volume final flush with several irrigation solutions. Part 3. Journal of Endodontics 9, 137-42.