A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique

Australian Dental Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 12-20

  Chen, J L ^a   Messer, H H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Procedural errors; Root canal preparation; Rotary nickel titanium; Silicone impressions

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; NICKEL; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL ERROR; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; NICKEL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SILICONES; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

EID: 0036517113     PISSN: 00450421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00297.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-276.
2. Walton RE. Principles and practice of endodontics. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996:201-233.
3. Craig RG, Mclwain ED, Peyton FA. Comparison of theoretical and experimental bending and torsional moments of endodontic files and reamers. J Dent Res 1967;46:1058-1063.
4. Lentine FN. A study of torsional and angular deflection of endodontic files and reamers. J Endod 1979;5:181.
5. Lim KC, Webber J. The effect of root canal preparation on the shape of the curved root canal. Int Endod J 1985;18:233-239.
6. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14:346-351.
7. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and steel instruments. J Endod 1995;21:173-176.
8. Portenier I, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Preparation of the apical part of the root canal by the Lightspeed and step-back techniques. Int Endod J 1998;31:103-111.
9. Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1997;23:503-507.
10. Zmener O, Banegas G. Comparison of three instrumentation techniques in the preparation of simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J 1996;29:315-319.
11. Roane JB, Sabal CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The 'balanced force' concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985;11:203-211.
12. Senia SE, Johnson B, McSpaddwn J. The crown-down technique: a paradigm shift. Dent Today 1996;15:38-47.
13. Bryant ST, Dummer PM, Pitoni C, et al. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 1999;32:155-164.
14. Nagv CD, Bartha K, Bernath M, et al. The effect of root canal morphology on canal shape following instrumentation using different techniques. Int Endod J 1997;30:133-140
15. Knowles KI, Ibarrola JL, Christiansen RK. Assessing apical deformation and transportation following the use of Lightspeed root-canal instruments. Int Endod J 1996;29:113-117.
16. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg 1971;2:271-275.
17. Bechelli C, Zecchi Orlandini S, Colafranceschi M. Scanning electron microscope study on the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of hand versus Lightspeed instrumentation. Int Endod J 1999;32:484-493.
18. Siqueira JF, Araujo MC, Garcia PF, et al. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod 1997;23:499-502.
19. Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endod 1987;13:243-245.
20. Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD. Microcomputed tomography: An advanced system for detailed endodontic research. J Endod 1995;21:561-567.
21. Barthel CR, Gruber S, Roulet J. A new method to assess the results of instrumentation techniques in the root canal. J Endod 1999;25:535-537.
22. Davies SR, Brayton SM, Goldman M. The morphology of the prepared root canal: A study utilizing injectable silicone. Oral Surg 1972;34:642-648.
23. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 10th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996:161.
24. Dalton BC, Orstavik D, Phillips C, et al. Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 1998;24:763-767.
25. Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Molven O. Effects of extensive apical reaming and calcium hydroxide dressing on bacterial infection during treatment of apical penodontitis: A pilot study. Int Endod J 1991;24:1-7.