Two-year clinical performance of two primer adhesives on class V restorations

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 93-99

  Merte, Knut ^a   Fröhlich, Matthias ^a   Häfer, Matthias ^a   Hirsch, Edgar ^a   Schneider, Hartmut ^a   Winkler, Maike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Class V lesions; Clinical trial; Fillings; Primer adhesives; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ADHESIVES; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONDING; FAILURE ANALYSIS;

PRIMER ADHESIVES; RESIN COMPOSITES;

DENTAL COMPOSITES;

ADHESIVE AGENT; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; TOOTH FILLING; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ACETONE; ADHESIVES; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0343484250     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1<93::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-W     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Krejci I, Lutz, F, Loher CE. Quantitative in vivo evaluation of four restorative concepts for mixed Class V restorations. Quintess Int 1991;22:455-464.
2. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphology relationship between resin and dentin in vivo and in vitro. Am J Dent 1992;5:19-23.
3. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintess Int 1992;23:135-141.
4. Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG. Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993;9:19-22.
5. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wie SHY. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1034-1044.
6. Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995;6:302-318.
7. Geurtsen W. Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:687-695.
8. Park SH, Kim KY. The anticariogenic effect of fluoride in primer, bonding agent and composite resin in the cavosurface enamel area. Oper Dent 1997;22:115-120.
9. Ferrari M. Sealing ability of last generation of adhesive-restorative materials placed on vital teeth. Acad Dent Mater 1998;12: 75-102.
10. Schneider H, Fröhlich M, Erler G, Engelke C, Merte K. Interaction patterns between dentin and adhesive on prepared class V cavities in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed 1999.
11. Krejci I, Lutz F, Mörmann W. Zahnfarbene adhäsive Restaurationen im Seitenzahnbereich. Zürich: Eigenverlag PPK: 1998.
12. Revised ADA clinical protocol guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. 1994.
13. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, Mjör IA. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J 1981;52:235-239.
14. Kidd EAM, Toffenetti F, Mjör IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J 1992;42:127-138.
15. Boghosian AA. Clinical evaluation of Optibond in Class V restorations (one year report). Santa Ana, CA: Kerr Corp Dental Mater Cntr; 1995.
16. Leinfelder KF, Broome JC. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new universal composite resin. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:177-183.
17. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:663-676.
18. Merte K, Hirsch E, Krause M. In-vitro-und In-vivo-Untersuchungen von GIZ-und Sandwichfüllungen bei kombinierten Klasse-V-Läsionen. Dtsch Zahnärtl Z 1997;52:28-32.
19. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Benz C, Hickel R. Class V fillings with four different light curing materials: three year results. J Dent Res 1998;77:190.
20. Merte K. Klinische Bewertung von Composite-Restaurationen der Kavitätenklasse I, II und V. Phillip J 1997;9:302-303.
21. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:1028-1032.
22. Schneider H. Kompomere, Linnich, Germany: Apollonia Verlag; 1998.
23. Mjör IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report. Quintess Int 1996;27:171.
24. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clincal status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-1702.
25. Fröhlich M, Schneider H, Merte K. Oberflächeninteraktion von Dentin und Adhäsiv. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:173-176.
26. Merte K, Hirsch E, Häfer M, Fröhlich M. Quality testing acetone-based primers - A clinical evaluation. J Dent Res 1997; 76:162.
27. Fröhlich M, Schneider H, Merte K, Engelke C, Erler M, Erler G. Dentin adhesive interface - interaction patterns in vitro and in vivo. J Dent Res 1997:76.
28. Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. Dry versus moist bonding: multiple and single component adhesives compared. Madrid: CED-IADR; 1998.
29. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25: 229-232.
30. Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N, Fletcher JM. A three year clinical evaluation of a compomer restorative. J Dent Res 1997;76: 162.
31. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1996;46:126-130.
32. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
33. Mjör IA, Moorhead J. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for failures and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Dent Res 1998;77:244.