Leisure time reading and orthographic processes in word recognition among Norwegian third- and fourth-grade students

Reading and Writing

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 65-88

  Bråten, Ivar ^a   Lie, Alfred ^b   Andreassen, Rune ^b   Olaussen, Bodil S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b ØSTFOLD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Norway)

^c OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Home literacy; Leisure time reading; Orthography; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 15744385625     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007976521114     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbott, R.D. & Berninger, V.W. (1995). Structural equation modeling and hierarchical linear modeling: Tools for studying the construct validity of orthographic processes in reading and writing development. In: V.W. Berninger (ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge II: Relationships to phonology, reading, and writing (pp. 321-353). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
2. Allen, L., Cipielewski, J. & Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Multiple indicators of children's reading habits and attitudes: Construct validity and cognitive correlates, Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 489-503.
3. Anderson, R.C., Wilson, P.T. & Fielding, L.G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school, Reading Research Quarterly 23: 285-303.
4. Barker, T., Torgesen, J.K. & Wagner, R.K. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading tasks, Reading Research Quarterly 27: 335-345.
5. Bjaalid, I., Høien, T. & Lundberg, I. (1996). The contribution of orthographic and phonological processes to word reading in young Norwegian readers, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 8: 189-198.
6. Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). London: Sage Publications.
7. Bråten, I. (1994). Learning to spell. Training orthographic problem-solving with poor spellers: A strategy instructional approach. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
8. Byrne, B.M. (1994). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers, American Educational Research Journal 31: 645-673.
9. Chall, J.S., Jacobs, V.A. & Baldwin, L.E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Cipielewski, J. & Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Predicting growth in reading ability from children's exposure to print, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 54: 74-89.
11. Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience, Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 733-740.
12. Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1993). Children's literacy environments and early word recognition subskills, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5: 193-204.
13. Ehri, L.C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In: P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Gjengset, G.H. (1987). Barn, ungdom og boklesing [Children, youth and book-reading], Barn [Children] 5(1): 9-48.
15. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In: K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301-330). London: Erlbaum.
16. Gough, P.B., Ehri, L.C. & Treiman, R., eds. (1992). Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Høien, T. & Lundberg, I. (1988). Stages of word recognition in early reading development, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 32: 163-182.
18. Høien, T. & Lundberg, I. (1991). KOAS Håndbok [KOAS Manual]. Stavanger: Center for Reading Research.
19. Juel, C., Griffith, P.L. & Gough, P.B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade, Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 243-255.
20. Jöreskog, K.G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In: K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). London: Sage Publications.
21. Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software.
22. Lie, A. (1991). Effects of a training program for stimulating skills in word analysis in first-grade children, Reading Research Quarterly 26: 234-250.
23. Lundberg, I. (1991). Reading as an individual and social skill. In: I. Lundberg & T. Høien (eds.), Literacy in a world of change (pp. 14-22). Stavanger: Center for Reading Research/UNESCO.
24. Lyster, S.A.H. (1996). Preventing reading and spelling failure: The effects of early intervention promoting metalinguistic abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
25. Olson, R.K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J. & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences, Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 339-348.
26. Patterson, K.E., Marshall, J.C. & Coltheart, M., eds. (1985). Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.
27. Perfetti, C.A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In: P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 36: 321-339.
29. Share, D.L. & Stanovich, K.E. (1995a). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition, Issues in Education 1: 1-57.
30. Share, D.L. & Stanovich, K.E. (1995b). Accommodating individual differences in critiques: Replies to our commentators, Issues in Education 1: 105-121.
31. Snow, C.E., Barnes, W.S., Chandler, J., Goodman, I.F. & Hemphill, L. (1991). Unfulfilled expectations: Home and school influences on literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy, Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360-406.
33. Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In: P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Stanovich, K.E. & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing, Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402-433.
35. Sulzby, E. & Teale, W. (1991). Emergent literacy. In: R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (eds.), Handbook of reading research. Vol. 2 (pp. 727-758). New York: Longman.
36. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper-Collins.
37. Thygesen, R. (1992). Språknormkonflikt og skrivevansker [Linguistic norms in conflict and writing difficulties]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
38. Tracey, D.H., D'Alessio, J.A. & Young, J.W. (1996, April). Children reading aloud at home: The helping behaviours of low SES mothers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
39. Treiman, R. & Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules, Memory and Cognition 11: 382-389.
40. Wagner, R.K., Barker, T.A. & Rashotte, C. (1994, April). The role of individual differences in orthographic processing ability in the development of word reading skills. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
41. Wimmer, H. (1995). From the perspective of a more regular orthography, Issues in Education 1: 101-104.