Student satisfactions in four mixed courses in elementary teacher education program

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-59

  Lin, Qiuyun ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid course; Mixed method; Student satisfaction; Technology integration

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

HYBRID COURSE; MIXED METHOD; STUDENT SATISFACTION; TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION;

CURRICULA;

EID: 43049128810     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Council on Education. (2005). To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught. Retrieved May 18, 2007, from http://www.acenet.edu/resources/presnet/teacher-ed-rpt.pdf
2. Amrein-Beardsley A., Foulger T.S., and Toth M. Examining the development of a hybrid degree program: Using student and instructor data to inform decision-making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39 (2007) 331-357
3. Andrews E. Preparing general education preservice teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology 17 (2002) 27-35
4. Ausburn L. Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective. Educational Media International 41 (2004) 327-337
5. Beyth-Marom R., Saporta K., and Caspi A. Synchronous vs. asynchronous tutorials: Factors affecting students' preferences and choices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 37 (2005) 245-262
6. Bonk C., Olson T., Wisher R., and Orvis K. Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning. Journal of Distance Education 17 (2002) 97-118
7. Clark R.C., and Mayer R.E. E-learning and the science of instruction. 2nd ed (2007), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
8. Coates D., Humphreys B.R., Kane J., and Vachris M.A. "No significant distance" between face-to-face and online instruction: Evidence from principles of economics. Economics of Education Review 23 (2004) 533-546
9. Davies J., and Graff M. Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology 36 (2005) 657-663
10. Doering A., Hughes J., and Huffman D. Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology?. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 35 3 (2003) 342-361
11. Donnelly R. Blended problem-based learning for teacher education: Lessons learnt. Learning, Media, & Technology 31 (2006) 93-116
12. Fjermestad J., Hiltz S.R., and Zhang Y. Effectiveness for students: Comparisons of "in-seat" and ALN courses. In: Hiltz S.R., and Goldman R. (Eds). Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 39-80
13. Fortune M.F., Shifflett B., and Sibley R.E. A comparison of online (high tech) and traditional (high touch) learning in business communication courses in silicon valley. Journal of Education for Business 81 (2006) 210-214
14. Frazee R.V. Using relevance to facilitate online participation in a hybrid course. Educause Quarterly 26 (2003) 67-71
15. Goldberg A., Russell M., and Cook A. The effect of computers on student writing: A metaanalysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 2 1 (2003)
16. Ho C.P., and Burniske R.W. The evolution of a hybrid classroom: Introducing online learning to educators in American Samoa. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning 49 (2005) 24-29
17. Irons L.R., Keel R., and Bielema C.L. Blended learning and learner satisfaction: Keys to user acceptance?. USDLA Journal 16 12 (2002). http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/DEC02_Issue/article04.html (Retrieved May 20, 2007, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/DEC02_Issue/article04.html)
18. Mansour B.E., and Mupinga D.M. Students' positive and negative experiences in hybrid and online classes. College Student Journal 41 (2007) 242-248
19. Neuhauser C. Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. American Journal of Distance Education 16 (2002) 99-113
20. O'Toole J.M., and Absalom D. The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two?. Journal of Educational Media 28 (2003) 179-190
21. Olapiriyakul K., and Scher J. A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study. Internet & Higher Education 9 (2006) 287-301
22. Overbaugh R., and Lin S. Student characteristics, sense of community, and cognitive achievement in web-based and lab-based learning environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39 (2006) 205-223
23. Parkinson D., Greene W., Kim Y., and Marioni J. Emerging themes of student satisfaction in a traditional course and a blended distance course. Tech Trends 47 (2003) 22-28
24. Peterson C.L., and Bond N. Online compared to face-to-face teacher preparation for learning standards-based planning skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 (2004) 345-361
25. Riffell S., and Sibley D. Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: An evaluation of hybrid course format. Computers & Education 44 (2005) 217-235
26. Skylar A., Higgings K., Boone R., Jones P., Pierce T., and Gelfer J. Distance education: An exploration of alternative methods and types of instructional media in teacher education. Journal of Special Education Technology 30 (2005) 25-33
27. Smith S. The positive and challenging aspects of learning online and in traditional face-to-face classrooms: A student perspective. Journal of Special Education Technology 20 (2005) 52-59
28. Stoyanova N., and Kommers P. Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. J. of Interactive Learning Research 13 (2002) 111-133
29. Summers J., Waigandt R., and Whittaker T. A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education 29 (2005) 233-250
30. Swenson P., and Evans M. Hybrid courses as learning communities. In: Reisman S. (Ed). Electronic learning communities issues and practices (2003), Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT 27-72
31. Thirunarayanan M.O., and Pérez-Prado A. Comparing web-based and classroom-based learning: A quantitative study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34 2 (2001-2002). http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/JRTE/Issues/Volume_341/Number_2_Winter_2001_20021/Comparing_Web-Based_and_Classroom-Based_Learning_A_Quantitative_Study.htm (Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/JRTE/Issues/Volume_341/Number_2_Winter_2001_20021/Comparing_Web-Based_and_Classroom-Based_Learning_A_Quantitative_Study.htm)
32. Twigg C.A. Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review 38 (2003) 28-38
33. Vaughan N. Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning 6 (2007) 81-94
34. Woods R., Baker J., and Hopper D. Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. Internet & Higher Education 7 (2004) 281-297
35. Young S. Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education 20 (2006) 65-77