Online compared to face-to-face teacher preparation for learning standards-based planning skills

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 345-360

  Peterson, Cynthia L ^a   Bond, Nathan ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asynchronous online learning; Distance learning; Instructional planning; Postgraduate teacher certification; Standards for teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008812612     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782419     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andrews, L. (2002). Preparing general education preservice teachers for inclusion: Web—enhanced case—based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27-35.
2. Bannan-Ritland, B., Harvey, D. M., & Milheim, W. D. (1998). A general framework for the development of Web-based instruction. Educational Media International, 35(2), 77-81.
3. Boud, D., & Feletti, G. I. (Eds.). (1997). The challenge of problem—based learning. London: Kogan Page.
4. Brandon, D., & Hollingshead, A. (1999). Collaborative learning and support groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 109-26.
5. Cooper, L. W. (2001). A comparison of online and traditional computer application classes. T.H.E. (Technological Horizons in Education) Journal, 28(8), 52-58.
6. Council of Chief State School Officers, Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialog. Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://www.ccsso.org/intasc.html
7. Dabbagh, N. H. (2000). The challenges of interfacing between face—to—face and online instruction. TechTrends, 44(G), 37-42.
8. DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2003, October). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. Computer and internet use by children and adolescents in 2001. NCES 2004-014. Retrieved October 28, 2003 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=20040l4
9. Diaz, D. P, & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on—campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130-135.
10. Egbert, J., & Thomas, M. (2001). The new frontier: A case study in applying instructional design for distance teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 391-405.
11. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Fisher, M. (2002). Collaborative online learning in virtual discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 3-17.
13. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2002). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
14. Gerber, M. M., English, J., & Singer, G. S. (1999). Bridging between craft and academic knowledge: A computer supported problem—based learning model for professional preparation in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22(2) 100-113.
15. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining the social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
16. Hacker, R., & Sova, B.(1998). Initial teacher education: A study of the efficacy of computer—mediated courseware delivery in a partnership context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 333-341.
17. Hendrix, K. H., Gilbert, G. E., Kozlowski, L., Bradley, E., Austin, L., & Valois, R. F. (2002). The impact of teacher training on utilization of problem- based learning in classroom health education. American Journal of Health Edu-cation, 33(5), 258-264.
18. Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. Hung, D. (2001). Theories of learning and computer—mediated instructional technologies. Educational Media International, 38(A), 281-287.
20. Hung, D. W. L. & Chen, D. T. (2001). Situated cognition, Vygotskian thought and learning from the communities of practice perspective: Implications for the design of Web—based e—learning. Educational Media International, 35(1), 3-12.
21. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000-2002). National educational technology standards for teachers. Retrieved March 30, 2003 from http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/t_stands.html
22. Kealy, W. A. (2001). Knowledge maps and their use in computer-based collaborative learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 325-349.
23. Kearsley, G. (1996). Teaching excellence: The foundation for technology effectiveness. Educational Technology Review, 6, 24-27.
24. Levin, B., Hibbard, K., & Rock, T. (2002). Using problem—based learning as a tool for learning to teach students with special needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3), 278-290.
25. McCollum, K. (1997). A professor divides his class in two to test value of online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, 43(24), A23.
26. McConnell, D. (1994). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Page Limited.
27. Meyen, E. L., Tangen, P., & Lian, C. H. T. (1999). Developing online instruction: Partnership between educators and technical developers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(1), 18-31.
28. Moore, M. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. Hohn, & D. Keegans (Eds.), Distance education: New perspectives (pp. 19-24). London: Routledge.
29. Murphy, K. L., & Gazi, Y. (2001). Role plays, panel discussions and simulations: Project—based learning in a Web—based course. Education Media International, 38(4), 261-269.
30. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2003). Standards. Retrieved March 30, 2003 from http://www.nbpts.org/standards/stds.cfm#framework
31. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003). NCES Fast Facts. Retrieved October 29, 2003 from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
32. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2002). Unit standards and rubrics. Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://www.ncate.org/standard/unit_stnds_ch2.htm
33. Oliver, K. (2000). Methods for developing constructivist learning on the web. Educational Technology (November—December), 5-16.
34. Peterson, C. L., & Bond, N. (2003). Cooperative learning online. Available: http://www.ci.txstate.edu/Peterson/cooponline.htm
35. Peterson, C. L., & Koeck, D. (2001). When students create their own Webquests. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(1), 1-4.
36. Ridley, D. R., & Sammour, H. Y. (1996). Viable alternative means of instructional delivery: Online courses as an alternative teaching method. College Student Journal, 30, 337-339.
37. Roblyer, M. D. (1999). Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student motives for taking Internet-based courses at the high school and community college levels. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 157-171.
38. Sage, S. (2000). A natural fit: Problem-based learning and technology standards. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(1), 6-12.
39. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem—based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
40. Schulman, A. H., & Sims, R. L. (1999). Learning in the online format versus in—class format: An experimental study. T.H.E. (Technological Horizons in Education) Journal, 26(11), 54-56.
41. Smith, D. (2001). Online instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(2), 55-59.
42. Smith, S. B., Smith, S. J., & Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37-46.
43. Thirunarayanan, M. O., & Perez-Prado, A. (2001-2002). Comparing Web- based and classroom—based learning: A quantitative study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 131-137.
44. Wiens, G., & Gunter, G. A. (1998). Delivering effective instruction via the Web. Educational Media International, 35(2), 95-99.
45. Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning. Elementary School Journal, 80(3): 107-27.
46. Young, J. R. (2002, March 22). “Hybrid” teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(2), A33-34