Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective;Die von Erwachsenen in gemixten Online Lernumgebungen am meisten geschätzten Kursgestaltungselemente: Eine amerikanische Perspektive;Eléments dans la conception des cours que les apprenants adultes apprécient le plus lorsqu’ils travaillent dans des environnements d’étude mixtes, en ligne et hors ligne: Une perspective américaine

Educational Media International

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 327-337

  Ausburn, Lynna J ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938722953     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952398042000314820     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ausburn LJ, (2001) Big bang for small bucks: making distance learning work for adult educators Proceedings of the Syllabus Conference on Technology in Higher Education Available online at: http://www.syllabus.com/summer2001.asp, accessed 21 September 2001
2. Ausburn, LJ. (2002). Fast, flexible, and digital: forecasts for occupational and workplace education. Workforce Education Forum, 29 (2): 29–49.
3. Ausburn, LJ. (2003). Beyond the inflection point: the softer side of learning’s new digital landscape. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 2 (1): 79–97.
4. Ausburn, LJ. (2004). Customized learning through learning objects: a union of instructional design and digital technology. OATE Journal, 8: 1–12.
5. Ausburn, LJ, and Ausburn, F. (1978). Cognitive styles: some information and implications for instructional design. Educational Communication and Technology, 26 (4): 337–354.
6. Barrett, E, and Lally, V. (1999). Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15 (1): 48–60.
7. Barron AE, Rickelmann C, (1999) Creating an online corporate university: Lessons learned Paper presented at International Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Training and Development Atlanta, Georgia, April
8. Blake, RR, and Mouton, JS. (1972). What is instrumented learning? Part I—Learning instruments. Industrial Training International, 7 (4): 113–116.
9. Bleed R, (2001) A hybrid campus for the new millennium Educause January–February, 16–24. Available online at: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0110.pdf, accessed 15 October 2003
10. Brookfield S, (1986) Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
11. Cappelli G, (2003) E-learning in the post secondary education market: a view from Wall Street In Pittinsky, MS (ed.) The Wired Tower: Perspectives on the Impact of the Internet on Higher Education Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ pp. 41–63
12. Conti GJ, (2003) ATLAS online (Academic Activities section) Available online at: www.conti-creations.com, accessed 12 May 2003
13. th Annual Adult Education Research Conference Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 77 82
14. Conti GJ, Kolody RC, (1999) Guide for using ATLAS OK, Stillwater
15. Degnan C, (1999) Taking the e-train PC Week Online Available online at: http://www.pcweek.com, accessed 18 August 2002
16. Fellenz RA, Conti GJ, (1989) Learning and reality: Reflections on trends in adult learning ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Training, Information Series No 336
17. Fellenz RA, Conti GJ, (1993) Self-knowledge inventory of lifelong learning strategies (SKILLS) manual Center for Adult Learning Research, Bozeman, MT
18. Galusha JJ, (2001) Barriers to learning in distance education University of Southern Mississippi. Available online at: http://www3.ncsu.edu/dox/NBE/galusha.html, accessed 30 October 2002
19. Granitz, N, and Greene, C. (2003). Applying e-marketing strategies to online distance learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 25 (1): 16–30.
20. Hara N, Kling R, (2000) Students’ frustrations with a web-based distance education course First Monday article 4_12. Available online at: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_12/hara/index.html, accessed 8 October 2003
21. Horton W, (2000) Designing Web-Based Training: How to Teach Anyone Anything Anywhere Anytime John Wiley and Sons, New York
22. Horton W, Horton K, (2003) E-learning Tools and Technologies John Wiley and Sons, New York
23. Irvine M, (2003) The emerging global e-education industry In Pittinsky, MS (ed.) The Wired Tower: Perspectives on the Impact of the Internet on Higher Education Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ pp. 65–109
24. Kascus, M. (1997). Converging visions of library services for off-campus distance education. Journal of Library Services for Distance Education, 1 (1): 32–41.
25. Kestenbaum T, (1999) Educational benefits of online learning Microsoft Work Document. Available online at: http://support.blackboard.net/components/Benefits_of_Online-Learning.doc, accessed 10 March 2003
26. Kimbrough, DR. (1999). On-line ‘chatroom’ tutorials—an unusual gender bias in computer use. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8 (3): 227–234.
27. nd edn, Prentice Hall, Cambridge, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
28. Knowles M, (1984) Androgogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
29. th edn, Gulf, Houston, TX
30. Kramer C, (2002) Success in On-line Learning Delmar, New York
31. Levine A, (2003) Higher education: a revolution externally, evolution internally In Pittinsky, MS (ed.) The Wired Tower: Perspectives on the Impact of the Internet on Higher Education Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ pp. 13–39
32. Merriam SB, Cafarella RS, (1999) Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
33. Mouton JS, Blake RR, (1974) Instrumented Team Learning: A Behavioral Approach to Student-centered Learning Scientific Methods, Austin, TX
34. Mouton, JS, and Blake, RR. (1984). Principles and designs for enhanced learning. Training and Development Journal, 38 (12): 60–63.
35. Phillips JJ, (1997) Return on Investment in Training and Performance Improvement Gulf, Houston, TX
36. Phillips, JJ, and Phillips, PP. (2002). Technology’s return on investment. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (4): 512–532.
37. Phillips PP, (2002) The Bottomline on ROI: Basics, Benefits, and Barriers to Measuring Training and Performance Improvement CEP, Atlanta
38. Pine II BJ, (1993) Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition Harvard Business School, Boston
39. Proost, K, and Elen, J. (1997). Effects of gender on perceptions of and preference for telematic learning environments. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29 (4): 370–385.
40. Rekkedal, T. (1983). Enhancing student progress in Norway. Teaching at a Distance, 23: 19–24.
41. Roberson TJ, Klotz J, (2002) How can instructors and administrators fill the missing link in online instruction? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration Available online at: http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/winter54/roberson54.htm, accessed 10 March 2003
42. Roblyer, MD, and Wiencke, WR. (2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 17 (2): 77–98.
43. Shea RH, (2002) E-learning today U.S. News & World Report 28 October 54 56
44. Sloan Consortium (2003) Sizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003 Available online at: http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/onlinesurvey.asp, accessed 20 November 2003
45. Smith RM, (1982) Learning How to Learn: Applied Theory for Adults Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
46. Stuart A, (1994) All for one CIO Magazine 15 October. Available online at: http://www.cio.com/archive/101594/mass_content.html?printversion=yes, accessed 28 November 2000
47. Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25 (10): 805–818.
48. Syllabus Magazine (2003) Transforming the academic enterprise: a conversation with Graham Spanier Syllabus Magazine 17 1 11 14
49. Symonds WC, (2003) Cash-cow universities Business Week 17 November 71 74
50. Tough A, (1977) Recent Learning Efforts: Recent Research and Future Direction Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto
51. Wenger E, (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity Cambridge University, Cambridge
52. Wolcott, LL. (1996). Distant, but not disconnected: a learner-centered approach to distance education. Techtrends, 41 (4): 23–27.
53. Woods, R, and Ebersole, S. (2003). Using non-subject-matter-specific discussion boards to build connectedness in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 17 (2): 99–118.