Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings

School Psychology Review

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 109-125

  Ardoin, Scott P ^a   Christ, Theodore J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42549123593     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ardoin, S. P., Suldo, S. M., Witt, J. C., Aldrich, S., & McDonald, E. (2005). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(1), 1-22.
2. Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C., Suido, S. M., Connel, J. E., Koenig, J. L., Resetar, J. L., et al. (2004). Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probe when conducting universal screening. School Psychology Review, 33, 218-233.
3. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Christ, T. J. (2006). Short term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimates of standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review, 35(1), 128-133.
5. Christ, T. J. & Ardoin, S. P. (in press). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology.
6. Christ, T. J., & Hintze, J. M. (2007). Psychometric considerations when evaluating response to intervention. In S. R. Jimmerson & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 93-105). New York: Springer.
7. Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2006). Curriculum based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R): Weekly grown and seasonal effects. Manuscript submitted for publication (copy on file with author).
8. Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: The standard error of measurement. School Psychology Review, 36, 130-146.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Compton, D. L., Appleton, A. C., & Hosp, M. K. (2004). Exploring the relationship between text-levehng systems and reading accuracy and fluency in second grade students who are average and poor decoders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(3), 176-184.
11. Deno, S. L. (2002). Problem-solving as "best practices." In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, pp. 37-56). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
12. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
13. Francis, D. J., Fuchs, L. S., Good, R. H., III, O'Connor, R. E., Simmons, D. C., Tindal, G., et al. (2002). Analysis of reading assessments instruments for K- 3, Results by grade. Retrieved August 24, 2003, from http://idea.uoregon. edu/assessment/analysis_results/se_lists/ assess_grade.pdf
14. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., McMaster, K. N., & Al Otaiba, S. (2003). Identifying children at risk for reading failure: Curriculum-based measurement and the dual-discrepancy approach. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 431-449). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13(4), 204-219.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 7.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
18. Good, R. H., III, & Kaminski, R. A. (2002a). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon.
19. Good, R. H., III, & Kaminski, R. A. (2002b). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available from http://dibels.uoregon.edu
20. Good, R. H., III, & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2003). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills: Administration and scoring guide (6th ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
21. Good, R. H., III, & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 179-193.
22. Good, R. H., III, Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision making utility of continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(2), 257-288.
23. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.
24. Hintze, J. M., & Christ, T. J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 204-217.
25. Hintze, J. M., & Silberglitt, B. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive vahdity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review, 34(3), 372-386.
26. Jenkins, J. R., & O'Connor, R. E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 99-149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Kelly, T. L. (1927). Interpretations of educational measures. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
28. Poney, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Axtell, P. K. (2005). An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per minute using curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 326-338.
29. Powell-Smith, K. A., Shinn, M. R., Stoner, G., & Good, R. H., III. (2000). Parent tutoring in reading using Uterature and curriculum materials: Impact on student reading achievement. School Psychology Review, 29(1), 5-27.
30. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Jessup, MD: ED Pubs.
31. Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., III, & Grimes, J. P. (1999). Reform trends and system design alternative. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly III, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition (pp 19-48). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
32. Sattler, J. M. (2002). Assessment of children: Behavioral and clinical applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Author.
33. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, pp. 671-697). Bethesda, MD: NASP Publications.
34. Speece, D. L. (2005). Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 487-493.
35. Stage, S. A. (2001). Program evaluation using hierarchical linear modeling with curriculum-based measurement reading probes. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 91-112.
36. Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7-26.